Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Influence of Surfactants on Bacterial Adhesion to Metal Oxide-Coated Surfaces
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Environmental Engineering Research
  • Volume 16, Issue 4,  2011, pp.219-225
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Environmental Engineering
  • DOI : 10.4491/eer.2011.16.4.219
 Title & Authors
Influence of Surfactants on Bacterial Adhesion to Metal Oxide-Coated Surfaces
Choi, Nag-Choul; Park, Seong-Jik; Lee, Chang-Gu; Park, Jeong-Ann; Kim, Song-Bae;
  PDF(new window)
The objective of this study was to investigate the bacterial adhesion to iron (hydr)oxide-coated sand (IHCS) and aluminum oxidecoated sand (AOCS) in the presence of Tween 20 (nonionic surfactant) and lipopeptide biosurfactant (anionic surfactant) through column experiments. Results show that in the presence of Tween 20, bacterial adhesion to the coated sands was slightly decreased compared to the condition of deionized water; the mass recovery (Mr) increased from 0.491 to 0.550 in IHCS and from 0.279 to 0.380 in AOCS. The bacterial adhesion to the coated sands was greatly reduced in lipopeptide biosurfactant; Mr increased to 0.980 in IHCS and to 0.797 in AOCS. Results indicate that the impact of lipopeptide biosurfactant on bacterial adhesion to metal oxide-coated sands was significantly greater than that of Tween 20. Our results differed from those of the previous report, showing that Tween 20 was the most effective while the biosurfactant was the least effective in the reduction of bacterial adhesion to porous media. This discrepancy could be ascribed to the different surface charges of porous media used in the experiments. This study indicates that lipopeptide biosurfactant can play an important role in enhancing the bacterial transport in geochemically heterogeneous porous media.
Bacterial adhesion;Column experiment;Lipopeptide biosurfactant;Metal-oxide coated sands;Surfactants;Tween 20;
 Cited by
Effect of surface modification of anode with surfactant on the performance of microbial fuel cell, International Journal of Energy Research, 2015, 39, 6, 860  crossref(new windwow)
Experimental and modeling analyses for interactions between graphene oxide and quartz sand, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2017, 52, 4, 368  crossref(new windwow)
transport in natural porous media, Water Resources Research, 2017, 53, 1, 361  crossref(new windwow)
Gross MJ, Logan BE. Influence of different chemical treatments on transport of Alcaligenes paradoxus in porous media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995;61:1750-1756.

Gannon JT, Manilal VB, Alexander M. Relationship between cell surface properties and transport of bacteria through soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991;57:190-193.

Fontes DE, Mills AL, Hornberger GM, Herman JS. Physical and chemical factors influencing transport of microorganisms through porous media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991;57:2473-2481.

Brown DG, Jaffe PR. Effects of nonionic surfactants on the cell surface hydrophobicity and apparent Hamaker constant of a Sphingomonas sp. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:195-201. crossref(new window)

Brown DG, Jaffe PR. Effects of nonionic surfactants on bacterial transport through porous media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001;35:3877-3883. crossref(new window)

Streger SH, Vainberg S, Dong H, Hatzinger PB. Enhancing transport of Hydrogenophaga flava ENV735 for bioaugmentation of aquifers contaminated with methyl tert-butyl ether. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:5571-5579. crossref(new window)

Chen G, Zhu H. Bacterial deposition in porous medium as impacted by solution chemistry. Res. Microbiol. 2004;155:467-474. crossref(new window)

Harvey RW, Metge DW, Barber LB, Aiken GR. Effects of altered groundwater chemistry upon the pH-dependency and magnitude of bacterial attachment during transport within an organically contaminated sandy aquifer. Water Res. 2010;44:1062-1071. crossref(new window)

Jackson A, Roy D, Breitenbeck G. Transport of a bacterial suspension through a soil matrix using water and an anionic surfactant. Water Res. 1994;28:943-949. crossref(new window)

Bai G, Brusseau ML, Miller RM. Influence of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant on the transport of bacteria through a sandy soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997;63:1866-1873.

Powelson DK, Mills AL. Water saturation and surfactant effects on bacterial transport in sand columns. Soil Science 1998;163:694-704. crossref(new window)

Chen G, Qiao M, Zhang H, Zhu H. Bacterial desorption in water-saturated porous media in the presence of rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Res. Microbiol. 2004;155:655-661. crossref(new window)

Hall JA, Mailloux BJ, Onstott TC, et al. Physical versus chemical effects on bacterial and bromide transport as determined from on site sediment column pulse experiments. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2005;76:295-314. crossref(new window)

Kim SB, Park SJ, Lee CG, Kim HC. Transport and retention of Escherichia coli in a mixture of quartz, Al-coated and Fe-coated sands. Hydrolog. Process. 2008;22:3856-3863. crossref(new window)

Kim C, Hsieh YL. Wetting and absorbency of nonionic surfactant solutions on cotton fabrics. Colloids Surf. A. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2001;187-188:385-397. crossref(new window)

Cameotra SS, Makkar RS, Kaur J, Mehta SK. Synthesis of biosurfactants and their advantages to microorganisms and mankind. In: Sen R, ed. Biosurfactants. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Vol. 672. Austin: Landes Bioscience; 2010. p. 261-280 .

Toride N, Leij FJ, Genuchten MT. The CXTFIT code for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or filed tracer experiments, version 2.0. Riverside: US Salinity Laboratory; 1995.

Pang L, Close M, Goltz M, Noonan M, Sinton L. Filtration and transport of Bacillus subtilis spores and the F-RNA phage MS2 in a coarse alluvial gravel aquifer: implications in the estimation of setback distances. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2005;77:165-194. crossref(new window)

Tufenkji N, Elimelech M. Correlation equation for predicting single-collector efficiency in physicochemical filtration in saturated porous media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:529-536. crossref(new window)

Martinez-Salas E, Martin JA, Vicente M. Relationship of Escherichia coli density to growth rate and cell age. J. Bacteriol. 1981;147:97-100.

Park SJ, Lee CG, Kim SB. Quantification of bacterial attachment-related parameters in porous media. Environ. Eng. Res. 2008;13:141-146. crossref(new window)

Kim SB, Park SJ, Lee CG, Choi NC, Kim DJ. Bacteria transport through goethite-coated sand: effects of solution pH and coated sand content. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2008;63:236-242. crossref(new window)

Lee CG, Park SJ, Han YU, Park JA, Kim SB. Bacterial attachment and detachment in aluminum-coated quartz sand in response to ionic strength change. Water Environ. Res. 2010;82:499-505. crossref(new window)

Foppen JW, Liem Y, Schijven J. Effect of humic acid on the attachment of Escherichia coli in columns of goethite-coated sand. Water Res. 2008;42:211-219. crossref(new window)

Park SJ, Kim SB. Adhesion of Escherichia coli to iron-coated sand in the presence of humic acid: a column experiment. Water Environ. Res. 2009;81:125-130. crossref(new window)

Johnson WP, Logan BE. Enhanced transport of bacteria in porous media by sediment-phase and aqueous-phase natural organic matter. Water Res. 1996;30:923-931. crossref(new window)

Li Q, Logan BE. Enhancing bacterial transport for bioaugmentation of aquifers using low ionic strength solutions and surfactants. Water Res. 1999;33:1090-1100. crossref(new window)