Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Optimized Synthesis Conditions of Polyethersulfone Support Layer for Enhanced Water Flux for Thin Film Composite Membrane
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Environmental Engineering Research
  • Volume 19, Issue 4,  2014, pp.339-344
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Environmental Engineering
  • DOI : 10.4491/eer.2014.045
 Title & Authors
Optimized Synthesis Conditions of Polyethersulfone Support Layer for Enhanced Water Flux for Thin Film Composite Membrane
Son, Moon; Choi, Hyeongyu; Liu, Lei; Park, Hosik; Choi, Heechul;
  PDF(new window)
Different types of polyethersulfone (PES) support layer for a thin film composite (TFC) membrane were synthesized under various synthesis conditions using the phase inversion method to study the combined effects of substrate, adhesive, and pore former. The permeability, selectivity, pore structure, and morphology of the prepared membranes were analyzed to evaluate the membrane performance. The combined use of substrate, adhesive, and pore former produced a thinner dense top layer, with more straight finger-like pores. The pure water permeation (PWP) of the optimized PES membrane was (LMH), whereas that of bare PES membrane was 3.24 LMH. Moreover, membrane selectivity, represented as divalent ion () rejection, was not sacrificed under the synthesis conditions, which produced the dramatically enhanced PWP. The high permeability and selectivity of the PES membrane produced under the optimized synthesis conditions suggest that it can be utilized as a potential support layer for TFC membranes.
Membrane;Optimization;Polyethersulfone;Support Layer;Synthesis Conditions;
 Cited by
Gilbert N, Balancing water supply and wildlife. Nature online 2010.

Elimelech M, Phillip WA. The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment. Science 2011;333:712-717. crossref(new window)

Gude VG, Nirmalakhandan N, Deng S, Renewable and sustainable approaches for desalination. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2010;14:2641-2654. crossref(new window)

Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Marinas BJ, Mayes AM, Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008;452:301-310. crossref(new window)

Lee J, Ren X, Yu HW, Kim SJ, Kim IS. Membrane Biofouling of Seawater Reverse Osmosis Initiated by Sporogenic Bacillus Strain. Environ. Eng. Res. 2010;15:141-147. crossref(new window)

Greenlee LF, Lawler DF, Freeman BD, Marrot B, Moulin P. Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 2009;43:2317-2348. crossref(new window)

Karagiannis IC, Soldatos PG. Water desalination cost literature: review and assessment. Desalination 2008;223:448-456. crossref(new window)

Matsuura T, Progress in membrane science and technology for seawater desalination - a review. Desalination 2001;134:47-54. crossref(new window)

Lee KP, Arnot TC, Mattia D. A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination-Development to date and future potential. J. Membrane Sci. 2011;370:1-22. crossref(new window)

Lau WJ, Ismail AF, Misdan N, Kassim MA. A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: A review. Desalination 2012;287:190-199. crossref(new window)

Pendergast MTM, Hoek EMV. A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energ. Environ. Sci. 2011;4:1946-1971. crossref(new window)

Li D, Wang H. Recent developments in reverse osmosis desalination membranes, J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:4551-4566. crossref(new window)

Rozelle LT, Cadotte JE, Corneliussen RD, Erickson EE. Final report on development of new reverse osmosis membrane. 1968.

Barth C, Gonçalves MC, Pires ATN, Roeder J, Wolf BA. Asymmetric polysulfone and polyethersulfone membranes: effects of thermodynamic conditions during formation on their performance. J. Membrane Sci. 2000;169:287-299. crossref(new window)

Al Malek SA, Seman MNA, Johnson D, Hilal N. Formation and characterization of polyethersulfone membranes using different concentrations of polyvinylpyrrolidone. Desalination 2012;288:31-39. crossref(new window)

Amirilargani M, Saljoughi E, Mohammadi T, Moghbeli MR. Effects of coagulation bath temperature and polyvinylpyrrolidone content on flat sheet asymmetric polyethersulfone membranes. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2010;50:885-893. crossref(new window)

Susanto H, Ulbricht M, Characteristics, performance and stability of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes prepared by phase separation method using different macromolecular additives. J. Membrane Sci. 2009;327:125-135. crossref(new window)

Rahimpour A, Madaeni SS. Polyethersulfone (PES)/cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) blend ultrafiltration membranes: Preparation, morphology, performance and antifouling properties. J. Membrane Sci. 2007;305;299-312. crossref(new window)

Qin JJ, Wong FS, Li Y, Liu YT. A high flux ultrafiltration membrane spun from PSU/PVP (K90)/DMF/1,2-propanediol. J. Membrane Sci. 2003;211:139-147. crossref(new window)

Marchese J, Ponce M, Ochoa NA, Pradanos P, Palacio L, Hernandez A. Fouling behaviour of polyethersulfone UF membranes made with different PVP. J. Membrane Sci. 2003;211:1-11. crossref(new window)

Ismail AF, Hassan AR. Effect of additive contents on the performances and structural properties of asymmetric polyethersulfone (PES) nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007;55:98-109. crossref(new window)