Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Forward osmosis membrane filtration for microalgae harvesting cultivated in sewage effluent
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Environmental Engineering Research
  • Volume 20, Issue 1,  2015, pp.99-104
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Environmental Engineering
  • DOI : 10.4491/eer.2015.005
 Title & Authors
Forward osmosis membrane filtration for microalgae harvesting cultivated in sewage effluent
Kim, Su-Bin; Paudel, Sachin; Seo, Gyu Tae;
  PDF(new window)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of forward osmosis (FO) system for harvesting microalgae cultivated in secondary sewage effluent. Microalgae species used in this study were chlorella sp. ADE4. The drawing agents used for forward osmosis system were seawater and concentrate of sea water reverse osmosis (SWRO) system. Chlorella sp. ADE4 cultured in secondary sewage effluent illustrated moderate efficiency in removal of total nitrogen (TN) (68%) and superior performance in total phosphorus (TP) removal (99%). Comparison of seawater and SWRO concentrate as drawing agent were made in FO membrane separation of the microalgae. The result from this study depicts that SWRO concentrate is strong drawing agent in FO membrane system providing an average dewatering rate of compared to seawater with average dewatering of . Results obtained from this study indicated that FO system could be viable option for harvesting the microalgae for further biodiesel production. SWRO concentrate as a drawing agent could be very important finding in field of membrane technology for disposal of SWRO concentrate.
Draw solution;Forward osmosis membrane;Microalgae;Seawater concentrate;Sewage effluent;
 Cited by
Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2010;14:217-232. crossref(new window)

Milledge JJ. Commercial application of microalgae other than as biofuels: a brief review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2011;10:31-41. crossref(new window)

Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A. Commercial applications of microalgae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2006;101:87-96. crossref(new window)

Zamani N, Noshadi M, Amin S, Niazi A, Ghasemi Y. Effect of alginate structure and microalgae immobilization method on orthophosphate removal from wastewater. J. Appl. Phycol. 2012;24: 649-656. crossref(new window)

Kessler JO, Moody CD. Drinking Water from sea water by forward osmosis. Desalination 1976;18:297-306. crossref(new window)

Achilli A, Cath TY, Marchand EA, Childress AE. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009;239:10-21 crossref(new window)

Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments: Review. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;281:70-87. crossref(new window)

Zou S, Gu Y, Xiao D, Tang CY. The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011;366:356-362. crossref(new window)

Zhao S, Zou L, Tang CY, Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012;396:1-21. crossref(new window)

Salter RJ. Forward osmosis. Water Cond. Prifi. 2006;36.

Achilli A, Cath TY, Childress AE. selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2010;364:233-241. crossref(new window)

Ge Q, Ling M, Chung TS. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: Developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J. Membr. Sci. 2013;442:225-237. crossref(new window)

Achilli A, Cath TY, Marchand EA, Childress AE. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009;239:10-21. crossref(new window)

Squire D, Murrer J, Holden P, Fitzpatrick C. Disposal of reverse osmosis membrane concentrate. Desalination 1997;108:143-147. crossref(new window)

McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;278:114-123. crossref(new window)

Tang CY, She Q, Lay WCL, Wang R, Fane AG. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010;354:123-133. crossref(new window)

Cornelissen ER, Harmsen D, de Korte KF, et al. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;319:158-168. crossref(new window)

Bougaran G, Bernard O, Sciandra A. Modeling continuous cultures of microalgae colimited by nitrogen and phosphorus. J. Theor. Biol. 2010;265:443-454. crossref(new window)

Tullock, John H. Water chemistry for the marine aquarium. 1st ed. Barron's Educational Series. 2002.

Holloway RW, Childress AE, Dennett KE, Cath TY. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Res. 2007;41:4005-4014. crossref(new window)

Buckwalter P, Embyae T, Gromly S, Trent JD. Dewatering microalgae by forward osmosis. Desalination 2013;312:19-22. crossref(new window)

Jarvela E. Forward osmosis as a part of water concepts in the mining industry [Internet]. Poster: VTT Technologies for Business; c2014. Available from:

Zhang X, Ning Z, Wang DK, da Costa JCD. Processing municipal wastewaters by forward osmosis using CTA membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2014;468:269-275. crossref(new window)

Coday BD, Xu P, Beaudry EG, et al. The sweet spot of forward osmosis: Treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination 2014;333:23-35. crossref(new window)