JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Use of biochar to enhance constructed wetland performance in wastewater reclamation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Environmental Engineering Research
  • Volume 21, Issue 1,  2016, pp.36-44
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Environmental Engineering
  • DOI : 10.4491/eer.2015.067
 Title & Authors
Use of biochar to enhance constructed wetland performance in wastewater reclamation
Gupta, Prabuddha; Ann, Tae-woong; Lee, Seung-Mok;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Constructed wetlands are established efficient technologies and provide sustainable solution for wastewater treatment. Similarly, biochar, which is an organic material, produced by means of pyrolysis, offers simple and low cost techniques to treat water and reduce carbon footprint. Combining both of these technologies can greatly augment the efficiency of the system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of constructed wetlands by using biochar as media. Horizontal wetland beds with dimension () were prepared using gravels and biochar, and cultivated with the Canna species. Synthetic wastewater was passed through these beds with average flow rate of achieving a retention time of three days. Pollutant removal performance was compared between the controlled and experimental wetland beds. This study reveals that the wetland with biochar were more efficient as compared to the wetland with gravels alone with average removal rate of 91.3% COD, 58.3% TN, 58.3% , 92% , 79.5% TP, and 67.7% .
 Keywords
Biochar;Constructed wetlands;Total nitrogen;Total phosphate;Wastewater treatment;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Phosphorus removal from secondary sewage and septage using sand media amended with biochar in constructed wetland mesocosms, Science of The Total Environment, 2016, 569-570, 123  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Kivaisi AK. The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review. Ecol. Eng. 2001;16:545-560. crossref(new window)

2.
He Q, Mankin KR. Performance variations of cod and nitrogen removal by vegetated submerged bed wetlands. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 2002;38:1679-1689. crossref(new window)

3.
Kadlec RH, Wallace S. Treatment Wetlands. 2th ed. CRC Press; 2008.

4.
Dordio AV, Candeias AJE, Pinto AP, da Costa CT, Carvalho AJP. Preliminary media screening for application in the removal of clofibric acid, carbamazepine and ibuprofen by SSF-constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2009;35:290-302. crossref(new window)

5.
Stottmeister U, Wiessner A, Kuschk P, et al. Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol. Adv. 2003;22:93-117. crossref(new window)

6.
Arias CA, Brix H. Phosphorus removal in constructed wetlands: can suitable alternative media be identified? Water Sci. Technol. 2005;51:267-273.

7.
Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, et al. Black Carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2006;70:1719-1730. crossref(new window)

8.
Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil - concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil. 2007;300:9-20. crossref(new window)

9.
Yu XY, Ying GG, Kookana RS. Reduced plant uptake of pesticides with biochar additions to soil. Chemosphere 2009;76:665-671. crossref(new window)

10.
Liu ZG, Zhang FS. Removal of lead from water using biochars prepared from hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;167:933-939. crossref(new window)

11.
Lehmann J. A handful of carbon. Nature 2007;447:143-144. crossref(new window)

12.
Spokas KA, Novak JM, Venterea RT. Biochar's role as an alternative N-fertilizer: ammonia capture. Plant Soil. 2012;350:35-42. crossref(new window)

13.
Yanai Y, Toyota K, Okazaki M. Effects of charcoal addition on $N_2O$ emissions from soil resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term laboratory experiments. Soil Sci. Plant. Nutr. 2007;53:181-188. crossref(new window)

14.
Hale SE, Lehmann J, Rutherford D, et al. Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:2830-2838. crossref(new window)

15.
Mohan D, Sharma R, Singh VK, Steele P, Pittman CU. Fluoride removal from water using bio-char, a green waste, low-cost adsorbent: Equilibrium uptake and sorption dynamics modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012;51:900-914. crossref(new window)

16.
Marschner B, Werner S, Alfes K, Lubken M. Potential dual use of biochar for wastewater treatment and soil amelioration. In: EGU General Assembly; 2013 April 7-12; Vienna.

17.
Chen BL, Zhou DD, Zhu LZ. Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:5137-5143. crossref(new window)

18.
Qiu YP, Zheng ZZ, Zhou ZL, Sheng GD. Effectiveness and mechanisms of dye adsorption on a straw-based biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:5348-5351. crossref(new window)

19.
de Rozari P, Greenway M, El Hanandeh A. An investigation into the effectiveness of sand media amended with biochar to remove $BOD_5$, suspended solids and coliforms using wetland mesocosms. Water Sci. Technol. 2015;71:1536-1544. crossref(new window)

20.
Zhang ZH, Solaiman ZM, Meney K, Murphy DV, Rengel Z. Biochars immobilize soil cadmium, but do not improve growth of emergent wetland species Juncus subsecundus in cadmium- contaminated soil. J. Soil Sediment. 2013;13:140-151. crossref(new window)

21.
Cao XD, Ma LN, Gao B, Harris W. Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43:3285-3291. crossref(new window)

22.
OCED. Guideline for testing of chemicals simulation test-Aerobic sewage treatment: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). France: 1996.

23.
APHA. APHA standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, D.C: 1998.

24.
Lee SM, Tiwari D, Choi KM, Yang JK, Chang YY, Lee HD. Removal of Mn(II) from aqueous solutions using manganese-coated sand samples. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2009;54:1823-1828. crossref(new window)

25.
Gersberg R, Elkins B, Lyon S, Goldman C. Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wetlands. Water Res. 1986;20:363-368. crossref(new window)

26.
Wolverton B, Mc Donald R, Duffer W. Microorganisms and higher plants for waste water treatment. Journal of environmental quality 1983;12:236-242.

27.
El-Ashtoukhy ESZ, Amin NK, Abdelwahab O. Removal of lead (II) and copper (II) from aqueous solution using pomegranate peel as a new adsorbent. Desalination 2008;223:162-173. crossref(new window)

28.
Vymazal J. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2007;380:48-65. crossref(new window)

29.
Ding Y, Liu YX, Wu WX, Shi DZ, Yang M, Zhong ZK. Evaluation of Biochar Effects on Nitrogen Retention and Leaching in Multi-Layered Soil Columns. Water Air Soil Poll. 2010;213:47-55. crossref(new window)

30.
USEPA. Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands For WasteWater Treatment: A Technology Assessment [Internet]. USEPA; c1993 [cited 2015]. Available from: http://water.epa.gov/type/wetlands/restore/upload/2003_07_01_wetlands_pdf_sub.pdf.

31.
Cayuela ML, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Hanley K, Enders A, Lehmann J. Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce $N_2O$ emissions? Sci. Rep. 2013;3.

32.
Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Clough TJ, Sherlock RR, Condron LM. Biochar adsorbed ammonia is bioavailable. Plant Soil. 2012;350:57-69. crossref(new window)

33.
Verhamme DT, Prosser JI, Nicol GW. Ammonia concentration determines differential growth of ammonia-oxidising archaea and bacteria in soil microcosms. Isme. J. 2011;5:1067-1071. crossref(new window)

34.
Kumar P, Sudha S, Chand S, Srivastava VC. Phosphate Removal from Aqueous Solution Using Coir-Pith Activated Carbon. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010;45:1463-1470. crossref(new window)

35.
Huett DO, Morris SG, Smith G, Hunt N. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from plant nursery runoff in vegetated and unvegetated subsurface flow wetlands. Water Res. 2005;39:3259-3272. crossref(new window)

36.
Ann Y, Reddy KR, Delfino JJ. Influence of chemical amendments on phosphorus immobilization in soils from a constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2000;14:157-167.

37.
Gray S, Kinross J, Read P, Marland A. The nutrient assimilative capacity of maerl as a substrate in constructed wetland systems for waste treatment. Water Res. 2000;34:2183-2190. crossref(new window)

38.
Wu Y, Chung A, Tam NFY, Pi N, Wong MH. Constructed mangrove wetland as secondary treatment system for municipal wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 2008;34:137-146. crossref(new window)

39.
Calheiros CSC, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML. Constructed wetland systems vegetated with different plants applied to the treatment of tannery wastewater. Water Res. 2007;41:1790-1798. crossref(new window)