JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Anaerobic digestion of food waste to methane at various organic loading rates (OLRs) and hydraulic retention times (HRTs): Thermophilic vs. mesophilic regimes
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Environmental Engineering Research
  • Volume 21, Issue 1,  2016, pp.69-73
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Environmental Engineering
  • DOI : 10.4491/eer.2015.068
 Title & Authors
Anaerobic digestion of food waste to methane at various organic loading rates (OLRs) and hydraulic retention times (HRTs): Thermophilic vs. mesophilic regimes
Kumar, Gopalakrishnan; Sivagurunathan, Periyasamy; Park, Jong-Hun; Kim, Sang-Hyoun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Generation of food waste is a serious issue that needs to be addressed worldwide. Developing suitable treatment methods while generating energy (methane) is a common practice for sustainable treatment of waste. In this study, methane generation by food waste was investigated in mesophilic and thermophilic regimes at various hydraulic retention times (HRTs) and organic loading rates (OLR). In temperature regimes, influent concentrations and HRTs ranged from 30 to 110 g COD/L and 18 to 30 days, respectively, which corresponding to an OLR of 1.0 to . Better methane production and organic removal was observed under thermophilic conditions because of the enhanced hydrolysis of complex polymers and microbial activity at higher temperature. The peak methane productivities attained in thermophilic and mesophilic regimes were 1.30 and , respectively. The maximum methane yields were achieved at 50 g COD/L and HRT of 24 d in both cases, and the values were 264 and COD, respectively. The results of this study will facilitate the development of sustainable methane production technologies using food waste as a feedstock.
 Keywords
Food waste;Methane;Mesophilic;OLR;Thermophilic;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Sakai S, Yoshida H, Hirai Y, et al. International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments. J. Mater. Cycles. Waste. Manag. 2011;13:86-102. crossref(new window)

2.
Lin CY, Sen B. Conference report: kitchen waste-based bioenergy: a report of the international workshop on kitchen waste-based bioenergy. Biofuels 2013;4:155-157. crossref(new window)

3.
Bao Dung TN, Sen B, Chen CC, Kumar G, Lin CY. Food waste to bioenergy via anaerobic process. Energ. Proc. 2014;61:307-312. crossref(new window)

4.
Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:5478-5484. crossref(new window)

5.
Abbasi T, Tauseef SM, Abbasi SA. Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation-An overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2014;16:3228-3242.

6.
Bayr S, Rantenen M, Kaparaju P, Rintala J. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of rendering plant and slaughter house wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;104:28-36. crossref(new window)

7.
Kim SH, Han SK, Shin HS. Kinetics of LCFA inhibition on acetoclastic methanogenesis, propionate degradation and ${\beta}$-oxidation. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part A. 2004;39:1025-37. crossref(new window)

8.
Palatsi J, Vinas M, Guivernau M, Fernandez B, Flotats X. Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste:main process limitations and microbial community interactions. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102:2219-2227. crossref(new window)

9.
Kondusamy D, Kalamdhad AS. Pre-treatment and anaerobic digestion of food waste for high rate methane production - A review. J. Env. Chem. Eng. 2014;2:1821-1830. crossref(new window)

10.
Escudero A, Lacalle A, Blanco F, Pinto M, Diaz I, Dominguez A. Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste. J. Env. Chem. Eng. 2014;2:819-825. crossref(new window)

11.
Takashimaa M, Tanaka Y. Acidic thermal post-treatment for enhancing anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. J. Env. Chem. Eng. 2014;2:773-779. crossref(new window)

12.
Kim SH, Choi SM, Ju HJ, Jung JY. Mesophilic co-digestion of palm oil mill effluent and empty fruit bunches. Environ. Technol. 2013;34:2163-70. crossref(new window)

13.
Shin JD, Han SS, Eom KC, Sung S, Park SW, Kim H. Predicting methane production potential of anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and food waste. Environ. Eng. Res. 2008;13:93-97. crossref(new window)

14.
APHA/AWWA/WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington, D.C: American Public Health Association; 2005. p.1368.

15.
Kim SH, Cheon HC, Lee CY. Enhancement of hydrogen production by recycling of methanogenic effluent in two-phase fermentation of food waste. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2012;37:13777-13782. crossref(new window)

16.
Kim SH, Shin HS. Effects of base treatment on continuous enriched culture for hydrogen production from food waste. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:5266-74. crossref(new window)

17.
Park JH, Yoon JJ, Park HD, Kim YJ, Lim DJ, Kim SH. Feasibility of biohydrogen production from Gelidium amansii. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2011;36:13997-14003. crossref(new window)

18.
Cho HS, Moon HS, Lim JY, Kim JY. Effect of long chain fatty acids removal as a pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of food waste. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2013;15:82-89. crossref(new window)

19.
Kim IS, Kim DH, Hyun SH. Effect of particle size and sodium ion concentration on anaerobic thermophilic food waste digestion. Wat. Sci. Technol. 2000;41:67-73.

20.
Angelidaki I, Ahring BK. Effects of free long chain fatty acids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 1992;37:808-812.

21.
Forster-Carneiro T, Perez M, Romero LI. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:6763-6770. crossref(new window)

22.
Cooney C, Ackerman RA. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cellulose waste. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 1975;2:65-72.

23.
Kim HW, Nam JY, Shin HS. A comparision study on the high rate co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste using a temperature phased anaerobic sequencing batch reactor system. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102:7272-7279. crossref(new window)

24.
Chen GY, Zheng Z, Yang SG, Fang CX, Zou XX, Zhang JB. Improving conversion of Spartina alterniflora into biogas by co-digestion with cow feces. Fuel. Proc. Technol. 2010;91:1416-1421. crossref(new window)

25.
Cho Sk, Ju HJ, Lee JG, Kim SH. Alkaline mechanical pretreatment process for enhanced anaerobic digestion of thickened waste activated sludge with a novel crushing device: performance evaluation and economic analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2014;165:183-190. crossref(new window)