JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effectiveness of gold nanoparticle-coated silica in the removal of inorganic mercury in aqueous systems: Equilibrium and kinetic studies
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Environmental Engineering Research
  • Volume 21, Issue 1,  2016, pp.99-107
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Environmental Engineering
  • DOI : 10.4491/eer.2015.126
 Title & Authors
Effectiveness of gold nanoparticle-coated silica in the removal of inorganic mercury in aqueous systems: Equilibrium and kinetic studies
Solis, Kurt Louis; Nam, Go-Un; Hong, Yongseok;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The adsorption of inorganic mercury, Hg (II), in aqueous solution has been investigated to evaluate the effectiveness of synthesized gold (Au) nanoparticle-coated silica as sorbent in comparison with activated carbon and Au-coated sand. The synthesis of the Au-coated silica was confirmed by x-ray diffraction (Bragg reflections at , , , and ) and the Au loading on silica surface was . The synthesized Au-coated silica performed an average Hg adsorption efficiency of ~96 () % with KD value of 9.96 () L/g. The adsorption kinetics of Hg(II) on to Au-coated silica closely follows a pseudo-second order reaction where it is found out to have an initial adsorption rate of and overall rate constant of . Au-coated silica particles are effective in removing Hg (II) in aqueous solutions due to their relatively high KD values, rapid adsorption rate, and high overall efficiency that can even decrease mercury levels below the recommended concentrations in drinking water.
 Keywords
Adsorption;Gold-nanoparticles;Mercury;Silica;Sorbents;Synthesis;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Wang Zheng LL, Baohua Gu. Mercury reduction and oxidation by reduced natural organic matter in anoxic environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:292-299. crossref(new window)

2.
John H, Pavlish, Everett A, et al. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Process Technol. 2003;82:89-165 crossref(new window)

3.
UNEP. Global mercury assessment 2013: Sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport. Geneva: United Nations Environment Program; 2013.

4.
Ding F, Zhao Y, Mi L, Li H, Li Y, Zhang J. Removal of gas-phase elemental mercury in flue gas by inorganic chemically promoted natural mineral sorbents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012;51:3039-3048. crossref(new window)

5.
Aposhian HV, Aposhian MM. Elemental, mercuric, and methylmercury: Biological interactions and dilemmas. In: Proceedings of the Air Quality II: Mercury, Trace Elements, and Particulate Matter Conference; 2000 Sept 19-21; McLean. p. A1-3.

6.
Francois MM. Morel AMLK, Marc Amyot. The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 1998;29:543-566. crossref(new window)

7.
U.S. EPA. Mercury update: Impact on fish advisories (EPA Fact Sheet EPA-823-F-01-001). Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water; 2001.

8.
Huang CP, Blankenship DW. The removal of mercury(II) from dilute aqueous solution by activated carbon. Water Res. 1984;18:37-46. crossref(new window)

9.
Walcarius A, Mercier L. Mesoporous organosilica adsorbents: nanoengineered materials for remocal of organic and inorganic pollutants. J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:4478-4511. crossref(new window)

10.
Fong TS, Johan MR, Ahmad RB. Synthesis and characterization of gold-titanium-mesoporous silica nanomaterials. Int. J. Electro. Sci. 2012;7:4716-4727.

11.
Leopold K, Foulkes M, Worsfold PJ. Gold-coated silica as a preconcentration phase for the determination of total dissolved mercury in natural waters using atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:3421-3428 crossref(new window)

12.
Bello OS, Bello IA, Adegoke KA. Adsorption of dyes using different types of sand: A review. S. Afr. J. Chem. 2013;66.

13.
U.S. EPA. Method 1631, Revision E: Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (EPA-821-R-02-019). Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water; 2001.

14.
Yazid H, Adnan R, Hamid SA, Farrukh MA. Synthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles supported on zinc oxide via the deposition-precipitation method. Turk J. Chem. 2009;34:639-650.

15.
Li Y, Yue Q, Gao B. Adsorption kinetics and desorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution onto humic acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;178:455-461. crossref(new window)

16.
Ho YS, McKay G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption process. Process Biochem. 1998;34:451-465.

17.
Ramadan H, Ghanem A, El-Rassy H. Mercury removal from aqueous solutions using silica, polyacrylamide and hybrid silica- polyacrylamide aerogels. Chem. Eng. J. 2010;159:107-116. crossref(new window)

18.
Amirbahman A, et al. Kinetics of homogeneous and surface- catalyzed mercury (II) reduction by iron (II). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47:7204-7213. crossref(new window)

19.
Bowman BT. Conversion of freundlich adsorption K values to the mole fraction format and the use of Sy values to express relative adsorption of pesticides. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1982;46740-743.

20.
Pierce RH, Olney CE, Felbeck GT. pp'-DDT adsorption to suspended particulate matter in sea water. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1974;28:1061-1073.

21.
King PH, McCARTY PL. A chromatographic model for predicting pesticide migration in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1968:248-261.

22.
Liu Y, Wang Q, Mei R, Wang H, Weng X, Wu Z. Mercury re-emission in flue gas multipollutants simultaneous absorption system. Environ Sci. Technol. 2014:14025-14030.

23.
Fitzgerald WF, Lamborg CH, Hammerschmidt CR. Marine biogeochemical cycling of mercury. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:641-662. crossref(new window)

24.
Ong CN. Minerals from drinking water: Bioavailability for various world populations and health implications. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. p. 61-74.

25.
Lim J, Kang HM, Kim LH, Ko SO. Removal of heavy metals by sawdust adsorption: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. Environ. Eng. Res. 2008;13:79-85. crossref(new window)

26.
Randtke SJ, Jepsen CP. Effects of salts on activated carbon adsorption of fulvic acids. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1982;74:84-94.