JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
No Response to Bidirectional Size-Based Selection in the Rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Fisheries and aquatic sciences
  • Volume 18, Issue 3,  2015, pp.287-296
  • Publisher : The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science
  • DOI : 10.5657/FAS.2015.0287
 Title & Authors
No Response to Bidirectional Size-Based Selection in the Rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis
Malekzadeh-Viayeh, Reza; Song, Choon Bok;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Although rotifers have been considered the best feeding option for several species of fishes in aquaculture, they are sometimes larger than appropriate for the early larval stage of some marine fishes. Thus, we aimed to determine whether size-based selection of the parents could affect the average body size of their progeny in two clonal populations of the rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis. From each of the clones, 20 individuals were bi-directionally selected toward both smaller and larger sizes and each individual-based selection was conducted for 10 consecutive generations. The results showed that although there were sometimes differences in mean body size between parents and their progeny, no directional trend was observed in all selected lines of both clones. We demonstrated that artificial selection in a rotifer stock cannot lead to an expected size range although they appear to exhibit a large degree of body size polymorphism.
 Keywords
Brachionus rotundiformis;Clones;Generations;Size-based selection;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Deudero S and Morales-Nin B. 2001. Prey selectivity in planktivorous juvenile fishes associated with floating objects in the western Mediterranean. Aquacul Res 32, 481-490. crossref(new window)

2.
Fu Y, Hada A, Yamashita T, Yoshida Y and Hino A. 1997. Development of a continuous culture system for stable mass production of the marine rotifer Brachionus. Hydrobiologia 358, 145-151. crossref(new window)

3.
Fukusho K and Iwamoto H. 1981. Polymorphosis in size of rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis, cultured with various feeds. Bull. Nat. Res. Inst. Aquaculture 2, 1-10.

4.
Geng H, Xi Y and Hu H. 2003. Effects of food component and concentration on population growth, body size, and egg size of freshwater rotifer Brachionus rubens. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 14, 753-756le in Chinese).

5.
Ghan D and Sprules WG. 1993. Diet, prey selection, and growth of larval and juvenile burbot Lota lota (L.). J Fish Biol 42, 47-64. crossref(new window)

6.
Glavic N, Kozul V, Skaramuca B, Glamuzina B, Lucic D and Tutman P. 2000. The synergetic effect of temperature and salinity on rotifer Brachionus plicatilis (O. F. Muller) population growth and lorica size in mass rearing. Acta Adriatica 41, 1.

7.
Hagiwara A, Gallardo WG, Assavaaree M, Kotani T and de Araujo AB. 2001. Live food production in Japan: recent progress and future aspects. Aquaculture 200, 111-127. crossref(new window)

8.
Harvey EA and Epifanio CE. 1997. Prey selection by larvae of the common mud crab Panopeus herbstii Milne-Edwards. J Exp Mar Bio Eco 217, 79-91. crossref(new window)

9.
Kohno H, Ordonio-Aguilar RS, Ohno A and Taki Y. 1997. Why is grouper larval rearing difficult?: an approach from the development of the feeding apparatus in early stage larvae of the grouper, Epinephelus coioides. Ichthyol Res 44, 267-274. crossref(new window)

10.
Kotani T and Hagiwara A. 2003. Fertilization between rotifer Brachionus plicatilis strains at different temperature. Fish Sci 69, 1078-1080. crossref(new window)

11.
Malekzadeh-Vaiyeh R and Song CB. 2004. Effect of salinity on demographic traits of the rotifer (Brachionus rotundiformis). J Fisheries Sci Tech 7, 39-45.

12.
McLaren JA. 1976. Inheritance of demographic and production parameters in the marine copepod Eurytemora herdmani. Biol Bull 151, 200-213. crossref(new window)

13.
Rodriguez EM and Hirayama K. 1997. Semi-mass culture of the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium splendens as a live food source for the initial feeding of marine finfish larvae. Hydrobiol 358, 231-235. crossref(new window)

14.
Rumengan IFM, Warouw V and Hagiwara A. 1998. Morphology and resting egg production potential of the tropical ultra-minute rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis (Mando strain) fed different algae. Bull Fac Fish Nagasaki Univ 79, 31-36.

15.
Shaw GW, Pankhurst PM and Purser GJ. 2003. Prey selection by greenback flounder Rhombosolea tapirina (Gunther) larvae. Aquaculture 228, 249-265. crossref(new window)

16.
Shirdhankar MM and Thomas PC. 2003. Response to bidirectional selection for naupliar length in Artemia franciscana. Aquacul Res 34, 535-541. crossref(new window)

17.
Snell TW and Carrillo K. 1984. Body size variation among strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Aquaculture 37, 359-367. crossref(new window)

18.
Song, CB, Kim YH, Lee J and Rho S. 1999. Size variation and cyclomorphosis of the rotifer, Brachionus rotundiformis, isolated from Cheju Island, Korea. J Aquacul 12, 267-274.

19.
Sue HM, Su MS and Liao IC. 1997. Preliminary results of providing various combinations of live foods to grouper (Epinephelus coioides) larvae. Hydrobiol 358, 301-304. crossref(new window)

20.
Tave D. 1986. Genetics for fish hatchery managers. The AVI publishing company Inc. U.S.A., 297 pp.

21.
Yoshimura K, Usuki K, Yoshimatsu T, Kitajima C and Hagiwara A. 1997. Recent development of a high density mass culture system for the rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis Tschugunoff. Hydrobiol 358, 139-144. crossref(new window)

22.
Yufera M. 1982. Morphometric characterization of a small-sized strain of Brachionus plicatilis in culture. Aquaculture 27, 55-61. crossref(new window)