JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Silkworm-food plant-interaction: search for an alternate food plant for tasar silkworm (Antheraea mylitta Drury) rearing
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Silkworm-food plant-interaction: search for an alternate food plant for tasar silkworm (Antheraea mylitta Drury) rearing
Deka, Manabendra; Gargi, Gargi; Kumar, Rajendra; Yadav, Harendra; Sahay, Alok;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
An experimental rearing of tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury was conducted to study silkworm-food plant-interaction and thereby to search for an alternate silkworm food plant. The silkworm-food-plant-interaction was studied with six different food plant species viz. Terminalia tomentosa, Terminalia arjuna, Terminalia belerica, Terminalia chebula of Combretaceae family and Lagerstroemia speciosa, Lagerstroemia parviflora of Lythraceae family. The rearing performance of silkworm on Lagerstroemia speciosa in terms of cocoons per DFL and silk ratio was found comparable with Terminalia tomentosa and Termonalia arjuna, the primary tasar silkworm food plant species. These three plant species also possessed better results in terms of physiological (leaf moisture content and net photosynthesis rate) and biochemical (Chlorophyll, protein, carbohydrate and crude fibre contents) characteristics to support silkworm rearing than Terminalia belerica, Terminalia chebula and Lagerstroemia parviflora. The correlation study between silkworm rearing performance and food plant`s constituents indicates commercial perspective of Lagerstroemia speciosa as an alternate food plant for tasar silkworm rearing.
 Keywords
Tasar silkworm;silkworm rearing;physio-biochemical characteristics;Disease free layings (DFLs);silk ratio;photosynthesis;transpiration;stomatal conductance etc;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Anderson, J.N., and Boardman, N.K. (1964). Studies on greening of dark brown bean plants. VI. Development of phytochemical activity. Aust. J. Bio. Sci. 17, 93-101.

2.
Cochran, W.G., and Cox, G.M. (1963). Experimental design. John Willey and Sons, Inc. New York, USA.

3.
Dash, A.K., Nayak B.K, and Dash, M.C. (1992). The effect of different food plants on cocoon crop performance in the Indian tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). J. Res. Lepidopt. 31, 127-131.

4.
Gupta, V.P., Mishra R.K., and Suryanarayana, N. (2008). Illustrated manual of tropical tasar culture technology. I. Host plant maintenance and silkworm rearing. Central Tasar Research and Training Institute, Central Silk Board, Government of India, Ranchi, India.

5.
Hansda, G., Reddy, R.M., Sinha, M.K., Ojha N.G., and Prakash, N.B.V. (2008). Ex-situ stabilization and utility prospects of Jata ecorace of tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury. Int. J. Indust. Entomol. 17(2), 169-172.

6.
Hedge, J.E., and Hofreiter, B.T. (1962). Carbohydrate chemistry. Whistler R. L. and J.N. Be Miller. 17 (eds.), Academic Press, New York.

7.
Jolly, M.S., Sen, S.K., and Ahsan, M.N. (1974). Tasar culture. (1st Ed.), pp. 266. Central Silk Board, Bombay, India.

8.
Krishnaswami, S. (1978). New technology of silkworm rearing. Indian silk. 16(12), 7-15.

9.
Krishnaswami, S., Noamani, K.R., and Ahsan, M.N. (1970). Studies on quality of mulberry leaves and silkworm cocoon crop production. Part I. Quality difference to varieties. Indian J. Seric. 44(1), 127-130.

10.
Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, J.H., Farr, A.L., and Randall, R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with Folin-Phenol reagent. J. Bio. Chem. 193, 265-275.

11.
Maynard, A.J. (1970). Methods in food analysis. Academic Press, New York.

12.
Ojha, N.G., Reddy, R.M., Hansda, G., Sinha, M.K., Suryanarayana, N., and Prakash, N.B.K. (2009). Status and potential of Jata, a new race of Indian tropical tasar silkworm (Antheraea mylitta Drury). Academic J. Entomol. 2(2), 80-84.

13.
Rahman, M.S., Bari, M.A., and Joarder, O.I. (2004). Studies on genetic variability and correlation of leaf yield and its contributing characters in Mulberry varieties, Morus sp. Indian J. Seric. 42(2), 151-154.

14.
Rai, S., Aggarwal, K.K., and Babu, C.R. (2006). Influence of host plant (Terminalia arjuna) defences on the evolution of feeding behaviour in the tasar silkworm. Current Sci. 91(1), 68-72.

15.
Rao, K.V.S., Mahobia, G.P., Roy, G.C., and Sinha, B.R.R.P. (2004). Relevance of in-situ conservation of wild tasar (Antheraea mylitta Drury) in India. Indian J. Ecol. 31, 127-131.

16.
Ray, N., Bhattacharya, A., Senapati, S.K., and Deb, D.C. (1998). Selection of mulberry varieties (Morus sp.) based on yield, nutrition elements and its rearing upon biovoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori L) for larval traits. Environ. Ecol. 16(1), 91-94.

17.
Reddy, R.M., Sinha, A.K., Kumar, R., and Prasad, B.C. (2010). Parental combination and rearing season compatibility for silk yield in tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury. World Applied Sci. J. 9(8), 855-859.

18.
Saikia, S., Handique, R., Pathak, A., and Das, K. (2004). Rearing performance of muga on the primary and secondary food plants with an attempt for revival of new extinct mejankari silk heritage of Assam. Sericologia. 44, 373-376.

19.
Singhvi, N.R., and Bose, P.C. (1991). Sericin - a deciding factor for the quality of cocoons and raw silk. Indian Silk. 26-28.

20.
Sinha, U.P.S., Bajepeyi, C.M., Sinha, A. K., Chari, B.N.B., and Sinha, B.R.R.P. (2000). Food consumption and utilization in Antheraea mylitta Drury larvae. Int. J. Wild Silkmoth and Silk. 5, 182-186.

21.
Suryanarayana, N., and Srivastava, A.K. (2005). Monograph on tropical tasar silkworm. Central Tasar Research and Training Institute, Central Silk Board, Government of India, Ranchi, India.

22.
Suryanarayana, N., Kumar, R., and Gargi (2005). Monograph on Indian Tropical Tasar silkworm food plants. Central Tasar Research and Training Institute, Central Silk Board, Government of India, Ranchi, India.

23.
Thangamani, R., and Vivekanandan, M. (1984). Physiological studies and leaf analysis in the evaluation of best mulberry varieties. Sericologia. 24(3), 317-324.