JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Antagonistic and growth promotion potential of endophytic bacteria of mulberry (Morus spp.)
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Antagonistic and growth promotion potential of endophytic bacteria of mulberry (Morus spp.)
Pratheesh Kumar, Punathil Meethal; Ramesh, Sushma; Thipeswamy, Thipperudraiah; Sivaprasad, Venkadara;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Endophytes provide multifarious benefits such as promotion of plant growth and yield, suppression of phyto-pathogens, phosphate solubilising and fixation nitrogen. A study has been carried out to explore growth promotion and antifungal activities of endophytes of mulberry (Morus spp.). Endophytic bacteria were isolated from mulberry plants and studied their cultural, morphological characters, growth promotion as well as their antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia bataticola and Fusarium oxysporum , two mulberry root rot associated pathogens. Except two isolates, all bacteria were colourless and the colony size of eight isolates was small. The margin of five isolates was irregular and the consistency of three isolates was creamy, six isolates was slimy and one was mucoid. Texture of seven isolates was convex and others were flat. Eight isolates were gram positive and the rest Gram negative, five were cocci and others were bacilli (rod shaped). Four isolates were motile and all were catalase positive and only three isolates were oxidase positive. Spore staining was positive only for two isolates. The growth promotion study showed that there was significant difference in root length and seedling length. The antagonistic effect of the bacterial isolates was tested against R. bataticola showed significant (p <0.05) influence of the bacteria, days after inoculation and their interaction on the inhibition of fungal growth. The isolate En-7 completely inhibited the fungus followed by En-5 (66.67%). The bacterial isolates significantly (p <0.05) inhibited growth of F. oxysporum in PDA. The mean inhibition was higher (70.45%) in case of En-7 followed by En-8 (68.65%) and En-10 (66.44%). The study reveals that some endophytic bacteria associated with mulberry have growth promotion and antifungal activity and could be explored for promotion of mulberry growth and managing root rot disease.
 Keywords
endophytic bacteria;antagonistic activity;growth promotion;mulberry;root rot;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Bacon CW, White JF (2000) Microbial Endophytes. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2000. pp. 85-117.

2.
Bakker PAHM, Berendsen RL, Doornbos R F, Wintermans PCA, Pieterse CMJ (2013) The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics. Front. Plant Sci. 4,165 10.3389/fpls.2013.00165. crossref(new window)

3.
Barretti PB, Souza RM, Pozza EA (2008) Bactérias endofíticas como agents promotores do crescimento de plantas de tomateiro e de inibição in vitro de Ralstonia solanacearum. Ciênc Agrotec 32, 731-739 crossref(new window)

4.
Berg G, Hallmann J (2006) Control of plant pathogenic fungi with bacterial endophytes. Microbial Root Endophytes (Schulz BJE, Boyle CJC, Sieber TN, Eds.), pp. 53-69. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

5.
Berg G, Krechel A, Ditz M, Sikora RA, Ulrich A, Hallmann J (2005) Endophytic and ectophytic potato-associated bacterial communities differ in structure and antagonistic function against plant pathogenic fungi. FEMS (Fed. Eur. Microbiol. Soc.) Microbiol. Ecol. 51, 215-229. crossref(new window)

6.
Boyle C, Gotz M, Dammann-Tugend U, Schultz B (2001) Endo- phyte–host interaction III. Local vs. systemic colonization. Symbiosis 31, 259-281.

7.
Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4951-4959. crossref(new window)

8.
Conn VM, Walker AR, Franco CMM (2008) Endophytic actinobacteria induce defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microb. Interact. 21, 208-218. crossref(new window)

9.
Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 395-412. crossref(new window)

10.
Hallman J, Sikora R (1995) Influence of Fusarium oxysporum a mutualistic fungal endophyte, on Meloidogyne incognita infection of tomato. Journal of Plant Disease and Protection 101, 475-481.

11.
He R, Wang G, Liu X, et al (2009) Antagonistic bioactivity of an endophytic bacterium isolated from Epimedium brevicornu Maxim. African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 191-195.

12.
Hurek T, Handley LL, Reinhold-Hurek B, Piche Y (2002) Azoarcus grass endophytes contribute fixed nitrogen to the plant in an unculturable state. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 15, 233-242. crossref(new window)

13.
Iniguez AL, Dong Y, Triplett EW (2004) Nitrogen fixation in wheat provided by Klebsiella pneumonia 342. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 17,1078-1085. crossref(new window)

14.
Kerry BR (2000) Rhizosphere interactions and the exploitation of microbial agents for the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Ann. Rev. Phytopath 38, 423-441. crossref(new window)

15.
Kloepper JW, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Zehnder GW, Murphy J, Sikora E, Fernandez C (1999) Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soilborne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Australasian Plant Pathology, 28, 27-33 crossref(new window)

16.
McInroy JA, Kloepper JW (1995) Survey of indigenous bacterial endophytes from cotton and sweet corn. Plant Soil. 173, 337-342. crossref(new window)

17.
Oliveira ALM, Urquiaga S, Baldani JI (2003) Processos e mecanismos envolvidos na influência de microrganismos sobre o crescimento vegetal. Embrapa Agrobiologia Documentos 161, 1-5.

18.
Ping L, Boland W (2004) Signals from the underground: bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant. Sci. 9, 263-269. crossref(new window)

19.
Pirttilä AM, Joensuu P, Pospiech H, Jalonen J, Hohtola A (2004) Bud endophytes of Scots pine produce adenine derivatives and other compounds that affect morphology and mitigate browning of callus cultures. Physiol. Plantarum 121, 305-312. crossref(new window)

20.
Pocasangre L, Sikora RA, Vilich V, Schuster RP (2001) Survey of banana endophytic fungi from Central America and screening for biological control of burrowing nematode ( Rhadopholus similis). Acta Horticulturae, 531, 283-290.

21.
Podolich O, Ardanov P, Zaets I, Pirttilä AM, Kozyrovska N (2015) Reviving of the endophytic bacterial community as a putative mechanism of plant resistance. Plant Soil, 388, 367-377. crossref(new window)

22.
Rosenblueth M, Martinez Romero E (2006) Bacterial Endophytes and Their Interactions with hosts, The American Phytopathological Society, 19, 827-837.

23.
Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Wei HX, Pare PW, Kloepper JW (2003) Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 4927-4932. crossref(new window)

24.
Sessitsch A, Howieson JG, Perret X, Antoun H, Martínez- Romero E (2002). Advances in Rhizobium research, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 21, 323-378. crossref(new window)

25.
Sessitsch A, Reiter B, Berg G (2004) Endophytic bacterial communities of field-grown potato plants and their plant- growth-promoting and antagonistic abilities. Can. J. Microbiol. 50, 239-249. crossref(new window)

26.
Sevilla M, Burris RH, Gunapala N, Kennedy C (2001) Comparison of benefit to sugarcane plant growth and 15N2 incorporation following inoculation of sterile plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus wild-type and Nif mutant strains. Mol. Plant- Microbe Interact. 14, 358-366. crossref(new window)

27.
Sikora RA, Pocasangre L, Feldezum A, Niere B, Vu TT, Dababat AA (2008) Mutualistic endophytic fungi and in-planta suppressiveness to plant parasitic nematodes. Biological Control, 46, 15-23. crossref(new window)

28.
Sturz AV (1995) The role of endophytic bacteria during seed decay and potato tuberization. Plant Soil, 75, 257-263. crossref(new window)

29.
Sturz AV, Christie BR, Nowak J (2000) Bacterial endophytes: Potential role in developing sustainable systems of crop production. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 19, 1-30. crossref(new window)

30.
Thomas P, Upreti R (2014). Testing of bacterial endophytes from non-host sources as potential antagonistic agents against tomato wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Adv. Microbiol. 4, 656-666. crossref(new window)

31.
Tiwari RP, Hoondal GS, Tewari R (2009) Laboratory techniques in Microbiology & Biotechnology, Abhishek publications, Chandigarh, India. pp. 190.

32.
Upreti R, Thomas P (2015) Root-associated bacterial endophytes from Ralstonia solanacearum resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars and their pathogen antagonistic effects, Front Microbiol. 6, 255. crossref(new window)

33.
Vale M, Seldin L, Araújo FF, Lima R (2010) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: fundamentals and applications. In: Maheshwari DK (ed). Plant growth and health promoting bacteria, Springer, Berlin, pp 21-43.

34.
Yoshida S, Hiradate S, Tsukamoto T, Hatakeda K, Shirata A (2001) Antimicrobial activity of culture filtrate of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RC-2 isolated form mulberry leaves. Phytopathology, 91, 181-187. crossref(new window)