JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of olfactory self- and cross-adaptation on perceiving odor in a moth
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of olfactory self- and cross-adaptation on perceiving odor in a moth
Qian, Kai; Chen, Haibin; Wan, Xinlong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Pheromone orientation in moths is an exemplar of olfactory sensitivity. To avoid cross mating, the responses of males to pheromone blends must be high specificity and temporal resolution. We tested the effects of olfactory self- and cross-adaptation of pheromone compounds and mixtures in Spodoptera litura moths by electroantennogram (EAG) recordings. The challenge of S. litura antennae to a pulse train of its own pheromone blends of Z9,E11-14:OAc and Z9,E12-14:OAc with 200 ms on/off and 1 s on/off indicated that the repetitive stimulation by 200 ms on/off with high dosages resulted in greater adaptation than that by 1 s on/off with low dosages and the adaptation index of Z9,E11-14:OAc in all treatments is significantly larger than that of Z9,E12-14:OAc, suggesting that high dosages with more frequent stimulation prefer to induce sensory adaptations and a different odor coding exist between the two components in the antennal periphery in this moth. The cross-adaptation EAG test among the two pheromone compounds and Z7-12:OAc and Z9-14:OH from congeneric species of S. litura showed that each of these compounds adapted the antenna more to that specific compound. The significantly higher adaptation to Z7-12:OAc and Z9-14:OH than to the pheromone components of S. litura induced by themselves suggested that both of them are coded by specific odor receptor neurons which are different from those tuned to the pheromone components of S. litura . Thus, we proposed that Z7-12:OAc and Z9-14:OH may play an important role in avoidance of heterospecific mating between S. litura and its sympatric moth species.
 Keywords
self-adaptation;cross adaptation;pheromone compounds;EAG;Spodoptera litura;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Albajesa R, Konstantopouloub M, Etcheparec O, Eizaguirrea M, Frérotd B, Sansa A, Krokosb F, Amélined A, Mazomenosb B (2002) Mating disruption of the corn borer Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using sprayable formulations of pheromone. Crop Prot 21, 217-225. crossref(new window)

2.
Baker TC, Hansson BS, Lofstedt C, Lofqvist J (1988) Adaptation of antennal neurons in moths is associated with cessation of pheromone-mediated upwind flight. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA85, 9826-9830. crossref(new window)

3.
Boyle J (2005) Olfactory coding in Drosophila larvae investigated by cross-adaptation. J Exp Biol 208, 3483-3491. crossref(new window)

4.
Claudianos C, Lim J, Young M, Yan S, Cristino AS, Newcomb RD, Gunasekaran N, Reinhard J (2014) Odor memories regulate olfactory receptor expression in the sensory periphery. Eur J Neurosci 39, 1642-1654. crossref(new window)

5.
Colbert HA, Bargmann CI (1995) Odorant-specific adaptation pathways generate olfactory plasticity in C. elegans. Neuron 14, 803-812. crossref(new window)

6.
D’Errico G, Faraone N, Rotundo G, De Cristofaro A, Trimble RM (2013) Sensory adaptation of antennae and sex pheromone-mediated flight behavior in male oriental fruit moths (Leptidoptera: Tortricidae) after prolonged exposure to single and tertiary blends of synthetic sex pheromone. Environ Entomol 42, 548-557. crossref(new window)

7.
Ekman G, Berglund B, Berglund U, Lindvall T (1967) Perceived intensity of odor as a function of time of adaptation. Scandinavian J Psychol 8. crossref(new window)

8.
Feng B, Lin X, Zheng K, Qian K, Chang Y, Du Y (2015) Transcriptome and expression profiling analysis link patterns of gene expression to antennal responses in Spodoptera litura. BMC Genomics 16, 269. crossref(new window)

9.
Firestein S, Picco C, Menini A (1993) The relation between stimulus and response in olfactory receptor cells of the tiger salamander. J Physiol 468, 1-10. crossref(new window)

10.
Gemeno C, Sans A, Lopez C, Albajes R, Eizaguirre M (2006) Pheromone antagonism in the European corn borer moth Ostrinia nubilalis. J Chem Ecol 32, 1071-1084. crossref(new window)

11.
Getchell TV, Shepherd GM (1978) Adaptive properties of olfactory receptors analysed with odour pulses of varying durations. J Physiol 282, 541-560. crossref(new window)

12.
Glendinning JI, Brown H, Capoor M, Davis A, Gbedemah A, Long E (2001) A peripheral mechanism for behavioral adaptation to specific “Bitter” taste stimuli in an insect. J Neurosci 21, 3688-3696.

13.
Kaissling KE, Strausfeld CZ, Rumbo ER (1987) Adaptation processes in Insect olfactory receptors, mechanisms and behavioral significance. Ann NY Acad Sci 510, 104-112. crossref(new window)

14.
Karpati Z, Tasin M, Carde RT, Dekker T (2013) Early quality assessment lessens pheromone specificity in a moth. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 110, 7377-7382. crossref(new window)

15.
Kelling FJ, Ialenti F, Den Otter CJ(2002)Background odours induces adaptation and sensitization of olfactory receptors in antennae of houseflies. Med Vet Entomol 16, 161-169. crossref(new window)

16.
Leal WS(1996)Chemical communication in scarab beetles: Reciprocal behavioral agonist-antagonist activities of chiral pheromones. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 93, 12112-12115. crossref(new window)

17.
Miller JR, Gut LJ, de Lame FM, Stelinski LL(2006a)Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 2): Case studies. J Chem Ecol 32, 2115-2143. crossref(new window)

18.
Miller JR, Gut LJ, de Lame FM, Stelinski LL(2006b)Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (Part I): Theory1. J Chem Ecol 32, 2089-2114. crossref(new window)

19.
Murmu MS, Stinnakre J, Réal E, Martin J-R(2011)Calcium-stores mediate adaptation in axon terminals of olfactory receptor neurons in Drosophila. BMC Neurosci 12, 105. crossref(new window)

20.
Mustaparta H(1997)Olfactory coding mechanisms for pheromone and interspecific signal information in related species of moths. In R.T. Carde, J.G. Millar (eds) Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 141-164.

21.
Stortkuh KF, Hovemann BT, Carlson JR(1999)Olfactory adaptation depends on the Trp Ca2+ channel in Drosophila. J Neurosci 19, 4839-4846.

22.
Sun F, Du JW, Chen TH(2003)The behavioral responses of Spodoptera litura (F .) males to the female sex pheromone in wind tunnel and field trapping tests. Acta Entomologica Sinica 46, 126-130.

23.
Tamaki Y, Noguchi H, Yushima T(1973)Sex pheromone of Spodoptera litura (F) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): isolation, identification and synthesis. Appl Entomol Zool 8, 200-203.

24.
Wada-Katsumata A, Silverman J, Schal C(2013)Changes in taste neurons support the emergence of an adaptive behavior in cockroaches. Science 340, 972-975. crossref(new window)

25.
Wang HW, Wysocki CJ, Gold GH(1993)Induction of olfactory receptor sensitivity in mice. Science (New York, N.Y.) 260.