JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Effects of Industry Classification on a Successful ERP Implementation Model
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Effects of Industry Classification on a Successful ERP Implementation Model
Lee, Sangmin; Kim, Dongho;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Organizations in some industries are still hesitant to adopt the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system due to its high risk of failures. This study examined how industry classification affects the successful implementation of the ERP system. To achieve this goal, we reinvestigated the existing ERP Success Model that was developed by Chung with the data from various industry sectors, since Chung validated the model only in the engineering and construction industries. In order to test to see if the Chung model can be applicable outside the engineering and construction industries, the relationships between the ERP success indicators and the critical success factors in the Chung model and those in the sample data collected from ten different industry sectors were compared and investigated. The ten industry sectors were selected based on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). We found that the impact of success factors on the success of implementing an ERP system varied across industry sectors. This means that the success of ERP system implementation can be industry-specific. Thus, industry classification should be considered as another factor to help IT decision makers or top-management avoid ERP system failures when they plan to implement a new ERP system.
 Keywords
Enterprise Applications;Enterprise Resource Planning;ERP Industry;ERP Success;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
D. Pasaoglu, "Analysis of ERP usage with technology acceptance model," Global Business and Management Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 157-165, 2011.

2.
C. Koch, "Enterprise resource planning: information technology as a steamroller for management politics?" Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 64-78, 2001. crossref(new window)

3.
B. McNurlin and R. Sprague, Information Systems Management in Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 1989.

4.
L. Jessup and J. Valacich, Information Systems Today (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall, 2006.

5.
S. Batra, "Impact of information technology on organizational effectiveness: a conceptual framework incorporating organizational flexibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 15- 25, 2006.

6.
P. Ifinedo, "An investigation of the impacts of some external contextual factors on ERP system success assesment: a case of firms in Baltic-Nordic region," International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 355-378, 2006. crossref(new window)

7.
E. T. Wang, and J. H. Chen, "The influence of governance equilibrium on ERP project success," Decision Support Systems, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 708-727, 2006. crossref(new window)

8.
Research and Markets, Global Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software Industry 2012-2017: Trends, Profits and Forecast Analysis. Dallas, TX: Lucintel, 2012.

9.
C. Rettig, "The trouble with enterprise software," MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 20-27, 2007.

10.
M. H. Martin, "An ERP strategy," Fortune Magazine, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 149-151, 1998.

11.
M. Al-Mashari, "Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: a research agenda," Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 165-170, 2002. crossref(new window)

12.
C. Koch and H. Buhl, "ERP-supported teamworking in Danish manufacturing?," New Technology, Work & Employment, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 164-177, 2001. crossref(new window)

13.
P. Garengo, S. Biazzo, and U. Bititci, "Performance measurement systems in SMEs: a review for a research agenda," International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25-47, 2005. crossref(new window)

14.
V. Peansupap and D. Walker, "Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organizations: a micro analysis," Construction Innovation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 135-157, 2005. crossref(new window)

15.
B. Y. Chung, "An analysis of success and failure factors for ERP systems in engineering & construction firms," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2007.

16.
S. Lee, "A preliminary modeling for an ERP system implementation in a multi-industry context," Journal of Korean Institute of Next Generation Computing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 77-88, 2014.

17.
J. Brazel and L. Dang, "The effect of ERP system implementations on the management of earnings and earnings release dates," Journal of Information Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1-21, 2008.

18.
J. E. Scott, "Technology acceptance and ERP documentation usability," Communications of the ACM, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 121-124, 2008.

19.
R. Alvarez, "Examining technology, structure and identity during an enterprise system implementation," Information Systems Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 203-224, 2008. crossref(new window)

20.
R. S. Chen, C. M. Sun, M. M. Helms, and W. J. Jih, "Role negotiation and interaction: an exploratory case study of the impact of management consultants on ERP system implementation in SMEs in Taiwan," Information Systems Management, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 159-173, 2008. crossref(new window)

21.
E. Kimberling, "2013 ERP report: What our new research reveals about ERP systems," 2013; http://panoramaconsulting.com/2013-erp-report-what-our-new-research-reveals-about-erp-systems/.

22.
V. R. Prybutok, L. A. Kappelman, and B. L. Myers, "A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: toward a theory for information systems assessment," Information Resources Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6-26, 1997. crossref(new window)

23.
G. Gable, D. Sedera, and T. Chan, "Enterprise systems success: a measurement model," in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information System (ICI 2003), Seattle, WA, 2003, pp. 576-591.

24.
T. W. Ferratt, S. Ahire, and P. De, "Achieving success in large projects: implications from a study of ERP implementations," Interfaces, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 458-469, 2006. crossref(new window)

25.
Wikipedia, "Technology Acceptance Model," https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_acceptance_model.

26.
P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette, "Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model," Information & Management, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 191-204, 2003. crossref(new window)

27.
F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-340, 1989. crossref(new window)

28.
J. W. Moon and Y. G. Kim, "Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context," Information & Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 217-230, 2001. crossref(new window)

29.
V. Venkatesh and F. Davis, "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies," Management Science, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186-204, 2000. crossref(new window)

30.
W. DeLone and E. McLean, "Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable," Information Systems Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60-95, 1992. crossref(new window)

31.
W. DeLone and E. McLean, "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update," Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9-30, 2003.

32.
J. K. Pinto and D. P. Slevin, "Critical factors in successful project implementation," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 22-27, 1987.

33.
A. J. Shenhar, A. Tishler, D. Dvir, S. Lipovetsky, and T. Lechler, "Refining the search for project success factors: a multivariate, typological approach," R&D Management, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 111-126, 2002. crossref(new window)