JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on Behavioral Traits of Library and Information Science Students in South India
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on Behavioral Traits of Library and Information Science Students in South India
Baskaran, S.; Babu, B. Ramesha; Gopalakrishnan, S.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Human behaviour normally depends on the environment of the incident and the time of its occurrence. The behaviour of people depends on many factors and these behaviour traits are an important aspect in the Library and Information Science (LIS) field. Hence in this paper an attempt has been made to examine the behaviour traits of LIS students in South India. Out of 400 questionnaires distributed 367 have responded and the response rate is 91.75%. In this survey three aspects comprising student behaviour have been analysed such as Work Environment, Natural Environment, and Social Environment. In the case of Work Environment the respondents were grouped as Workaholic, Impatience, Achievement oriented, Rash nature, and Punctuality. Further, in respect to Natural environment, the respondents are grouped as Complacent, Patience, Easygoing, and Relaxed. Last, the respondents were grouped in the Social Environment as Balancing nature, Magnanimity, Naturalistic, Assertive nature, Dependency, Lucrative, Lonely nature, and Time Based personality. Finally the authors conclude that LIS students need to possess these qualities and behaviours to work in different environments.
 Keywords
LIS students;behaviour traits;work environment;natural environment;social environment;India;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 391-418. crossref(new window)

2.
Feng, X., & Zhang, M. l. (2009). Impact of personality traits on perception of relational benefits: an empirical study in service context. In First international conference on Infor-mation Science and engineering. (pp. 4326-4329) Beijing, China: IEEE Conference Publications. Retrieved from http://ieeeexplore.ieee.org/ielx5/5454173/0545 5189.pdf.

3.
Friedman, M., & Rosenman R. H. (1959). Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings blood cholesterol level, blood clotting time, incidence of arcus senilis, and clinical coromary artery disease. Journal of American Medical Association, 169(12), 1286- 1296. crossref(new window)

4.
Mann, R. D. (1959). A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 56(4), 241-270. crossref(new window)

5.
McAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7(4), 295-321. crossref(new window)

6.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

7.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

8.
Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35-71. crossref(new window)

9.
Vazquez-Carrasco, R., & Foxall, G. R. (2006). Influence of personality traits on satisfaction, perception of relational benefits, and loyalty in a personal service context. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(3), 205-219. crossref(new window)

10.
Wright, P. L. (1996). Managerial leadership. London: Thomson Learning.

11.
Zeller, R. A., & Carmines, E. G. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences: The link between theory and data. Cambridge University Press.

12.
Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach's ${\alpha}$, Revelle's ${\beta}$, and Mcdonald's ${\omega}$ H: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123-133. crossref(new window)