JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Principles for Helpful Sequence and Deduction of Knowledge Organization Systems - An Exploratory Study
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Principles for Helpful Sequence and Deduction of Knowledge Organization Systems - An Exploratory Study
Asundi, A.Y.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Dr. Ranganathan`s "Principles for Helpful Sequence" among the set of normative principles play an exclusive role in the arrangement of subject isolates. Each subject in the universe of subjects is regulated by a guiding principle of its own which analogously determines the sequence of Arrays in ordering the subject surrogates or isolates. For example, the "Principle of Later-in-Evolution" is applied for sequencing isolates of Animal and Plant Species; this concept can be applied to one of the tools of KOS viz. Taxonomies. The application of Principles for Helpful Sequence is summarily presented and in the process the paper highlights the inherent elements of knowledge organization in each one of these principles in a manner that might map the future course of research in this area with the potentiality to bring about a relation between principles for helpful sequence and KOS.
 Keywords
Library Classification;Principles for Helpful Sequence;Knowledge Organization Systems;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Buchel, O., & Hill, L. L. (2010). Treatment of Georeferencing in knowledge organization systems: North American contributions to integrated Georeferencing. Knowledge Organization-International Journal, 37(1), 72-78.

2.
Dahlberg, I. (1978). Ontical structures and universal classification (Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science Series, No. 11). Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.

3.
Gopinath, M.A. & Seetharama, S. (1975). Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification. In A. Neelameghan (Ed.), Ordering systems for global information networks: Proceedings of the Third International Study Conference on Classification Research (pp. 121-135). Bangalore: DRTC, SRELS and FID/CR.

4.
Hjorland, B. B. (2008). What is knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization - International Journal, 35(2-3), 86-101.

5.
La Barre, K. (2006). The use of faceted analytico-synthetic theory as revealed in the practice of website construction and design (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

6.
Lei Zeng, M. (2008). Knowledge organization systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization - International Journal, 35(2-3), 160-182.

7.
Ohly, H. P. (2007). Past and future of knowledge organization. In K.S. Raghavan (Ed.), International Conference on Future of Knowledge Organization in the Networked Environment (pp. 1-6). Bangalore: DRTC, Indian Statistical Institute.

8.
Parkhi, R. S. (1972). Library classification: Evolution of a dynamic theory. Delhi: Vikas Pub. House.

9.
Raghavan, L. (2012). Why do we light a lamp before the deity. Visvaayudha - A Monthly Magazine of All India. Vishnusahasranama Cultural Federation, 15 (180), 8.

10.
Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to library classification (3rd ed.). Assisted by M.A. Gopinath. Reprinted 1989. New Delhi: Ess Ess Publishers for Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.

11.
Ranganathan, S. R. (1987). Colon Classification (7th ed.). Revised and Edited by M.A. Gopinath. Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.