JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Preference and Use of Electronic Information and Resources by Blind/Visually Impaired in NCR Libraries in India
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Preference and Use of Electronic Information and Resources by Blind/Visually Impaired in NCR Libraries in India
Kumar, Shailendra; Sanaman, Gareema;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This paper aims to determine the preference and use of electronic information and resources by blind/visually impaired users in the leading National Capital Region (NCR) libraries of India. Survey methodology has been used as the basic research tool for data collection with the help of questionnaires. The 125 in total users surveyed in all the five libraries were selected randomly on the basis of willingness of the users with experience of working in digital environments to participate in the survey. The survey results were tabulated and analyzed with descriptive statistics methods using Excel software and `Stata version 11`. The findings reveal that ICT have a positive impact in the lives of people with disabilities as it helps them to work independently and increases the level of confidence among them. The Internet is the most preferred medium of access to information among the majority of blind/visually impaired users. The `Complexity of content available on the net` is found as the major challenge faced during Internet use by blind users of NCR libraries. `Audio books on CDs/DVDs and DAISY books` are the most preferred electronic resources among the majority of blind/visually impaired users. This study will help the library professionals and organizations/institutions serving people with disabilities to develop effective library services for blind/visually impaired users in the digital environment on the basis of findings on information usage behavior in the study.
 Keywords
Blind/vision impaired;Electronic Resources;Internet;Information Resources;NCR Libraries;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Baker, P. M. A., Hanson, J. & Myhill, W. N. (2009). The promise of municipal WiFi and failed policies of inclusion: The disability divide. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 14(1/2), 47-59.

2.
Balini, B. (2000). A Needs Assessment of CNIB Library Services. University of Alberta, (April,12): 25.

3.
Beverley, C. A., Bath, P. A. & Barber, R. (2007). Can two established information models explain the information behavior of visually impaired people seeking health and social care information? Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 9-32. crossref(new window)

4.
Byerley, S. L. & Chambers, M. B. (2002). Accessibility and usability of Web-based library databases for non-visual users. Library Hi Tech, 20(2), 169-178. crossref(new window)

5.
Cahill, K. & Cornish, S. (2003). Assistive technology for users in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea public libraries in the UK. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 37(3), 190-193. crossref(new window)

6.
Chalfen, D. H. & Farb, S. E. (1996). Universal access and the ADA: A disability access design specifications for the new UCLA library online information system. Library Hi Tech, 14(1), 51-56. crossref(new window)

7.
Cohen, S. (2006). Enabling libraries: How to serve people with disabilities. Tennessee Libraries, 56(2), 62- 73.

8.
Craven, J. & Booth, H. (2006). Putting awareness into practice: Practical steps for conducting usability tests. Library Review, 55(3), 179-194. crossref(new window)

9.
Cullen, R. (2001). Addressing the digital divide. 67th IFLA Council and General Conference, August 16-25 (pp.1-14). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED459714.pdf

10.
Cullen, R. (2003). The digital divide: A global and national call to action. The Electronic Library, 21(3), 247-257. crossref(new window)

11.
Dermody, K. & Majekodunmi, N. (2011). Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities. Library Hi Tech, 29(1), 149-160. crossref(new window)

12.
Dobransky, K. & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in Internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 313-334. crossref(new window)

13.
Epp, M. A. (2006). Closing the 95 percent gap: Library resource sharing for people with print disabilities. Library Trends, 54(3), Winter, 411-429. crossref(new window)

14.
Grimaldi, C. & Goette, T. (1999). The Internet and the independence of individuals with disabilities. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 9(4), 272-280. crossref(new window)

15.
Horwath, J. (2002). Evaluating opportunities for expanded information access: A study of the accessibility of four online databases. Library Hi Tech, 20(2), 199-206. crossref(new window)

16.
Huang, J. & Russell, S. (2006). The digital divide and academic achievement. The Electronic Library, 24(2), 160-173. crossref(new window)

17.
Kishore, R. (1999). Voice of India' s disabled: Demanding equality in library services. 65th IFLA Council and General Conference, Bangkok, August 20-28 (pp.1-7). Retrieved from http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla65/papers/044-132e.htm.

18.
Koulikourdi, A. (2008). Library services for people with disabilities in Greece. Library Review, 57(2), 138-148. crossref(new window)

19.
Kumar, S. and Singh, M. (2011). Access and use of electronic information resources by scientists of National Physical Laboratory in India: A case study. Singapore Journal of Library and Information Management, 40, 33-49.

20.
Kwak, S. J. & Bae, K. J. (2009). Ubiquitous library usability test for the improvement of information access for the blind. The Electronic Library, 27(4), 623-639. crossref(new window)

21.
Madhusudhan, M. (2010). Use of electronic resources by research scholars of Kurukshetra University. The Electronic Library, 28(4), 492-506. crossref(new window)

22.
Myhill, C. E. (2002). ICT for access to information services for disabled people: An overview of projects and services at Gateshead libraries services. Program, 36(3), 176-181. crossref(new window)

23.
National Capital Region Planning Board (2010). Rationale. NCRPB. Retrieved from http://ncrpb.nic.in/rationale.php.

24.
Oppenheim, C. & Selby, K. (1999). Access to information on the World Wide Web for blind and visually impaired people. Aslib Proceedings, 51(10), 335-345. crossref(new window)

25.
Power, R. & LeBeau, C. (2009). How well do academic library web sites address the needs of database users with visual disabilities? The Reference Librarian, 50, 55-72. crossref(new window)

26.
Riley, C. A. (2002). Libraries, aggregator databases, screen readers and clients with disabilities. Library Hi Tech, 20(2), 179-187. crossref(new window)

27.
Roy, P. C. & Bandyopadhyay, R. (2009). Designing barrier free services for visually challenged persons in the academic libraries in India. Proceedings of the International Conference on Academic Libraries, Delhi, October 5-8 (pp. 626-629). Retrieved from http://crl.du.ac.in/ical09/papers/index_files/ical-105_241_602_1_RV.pdf.

28.
Russell, S. E. & Huang, J. (2009). Libraries' role in equalizing access to information. Library Management, 30(1/2), 69-76. crossref(new window)

29.
Salinas, R. (2003). Addressing the digital divide through collection development. Collection Development, 22(3), 131-136.

30.
Schmetzke, A. (2001). Web accessibility at University libraries and library schools. Library Hi Tech, 19(1), 35-49. crossref(new window)

31.
Schmetzke, A. (2002). Accessibility of web- based information resources for people with disabilities. Library Hi Tech, 20(2), 135-136. crossref(new window)

32.
Sugano, A. et al. (2010). eBraille: a web-based translation program for Japanese text to Braille. Internet Research, 20(5), 582-592. crossref(new window)

33.
Tahir, M., Mahmood, K., and Shafique, F. (2010). Use of electronic information resources and facilities by humanities scholars. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 122-136. crossref(new window)

34.
Vandenbark, R.T. (2010). Tending a wild garden: Library web design for persons with disabilities. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(1), 23-29.

35.
Vincente, M. R. & Lopez, A. J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: some evidence for internet use. The Information Society, 26, 48-64. crossref(new window)

36.
Williamson, K. (1998). Discovered by chance: the role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library and Information Science Research, 20(1), 23-40. crossref(new window)

37.
Yu, H. (2002). Web accessibility and the law: Recommendations for implementation. Library Hi Tech, 20(4), 406-419. crossref(new window)