JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Global Scenario of Open Access Publishing: A Decadal Analysis of Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) 2003-2012
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Global Scenario of Open Access Publishing: A Decadal Analysis of Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) 2003-2012
Pandita, Ramesh; Ramesha, B.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The present study aims to assess the growth of open access journals at a global level. The concept of Open Access (OA) publishing is being well received among academic circles and as a result we can see more and more scholarly content is being made these days available in open access format. The present study is simply an attempt to assess the trend and growth of open access journals during the last decade, viz. for the period 2003-2012, for which data has been retrieved from the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), which as of date hosts more than 9700 journals from 120 countries across the world covering major languages of the world. But keeping in view the period of our study the data has been retrieved as per our applicability, which as a result confines our study to 8453 journals only. The directory covers 18 main subject areas having 76 sub-disciplines, each having on average 118.53 journals. During the entire decade the number of countries which entered into OA publishing rose from 49 to 120 with a growth of 144%, and if this growth rate continues to be the same for the next five years, viz. by 2018, the world will turn into 100% open access. At the continental level Europe leads the tally by publishing a maximum of 3140 OA journals contributed by 43 countries across Europe, which again is the highest number from any continent.
 Keywords
DOAJ;Open Access (OA);Open Access Movement;Open Access Publishing;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Archives of American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum@ Listserver.Sigmaxi.Org. Amsci-forum.amsci.org. Retrieved from article=1048&context=fac_pubs

2.
Arunachalam, S. (2008). Open access in India: Hopes and frustrations. Proceedings of the ELPUB 2008 Conference on Electronic Publishing, Toronto, Canada, June 2008 (pp. 271-279).

3.
Bjork, B. C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guonason, G. N. (2010). In E. Scalas (Ed.), Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE 5(6), e11273. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011273. crossref(new window)

4.
Bluh, P. (2006). Open access, legal publishing, and online repositories. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(1), 126-130. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? crossref(new window)

5.
Chan,L., & Kirsop, B. (2001). Open archiving opportunities for developing countries: Towards equitable distribution of global knowledge. Ariadne, 20. Retrieved from http:// www.ariadne.ac.un/issue30/oai-chan

6.
Crawford, W. (2002). Free electronic refereed journals: Getting past the arc of enthusiasm. Learned Publish-ing, 15. doi:10.1087/09531510252848881 crossref(new window)

7.
Deschamps, C. (2003). Round table: open access issues for developing countries. Information Services & Use, 23 (2/3), 149-59.

8.
Directory of Open Access Journals. Retrieved from http://bibliotecnica.upc.es/rebiun/workshop5/presentacions/17_doaj_jorgensen.pdf

9.
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantages of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5): e157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459247 crossref(new window)

10.
Ghosh, S. B., & Das, A. K. (2006). Open access and institutional repositories - A developing country perspective: A case study of India. Papers of 72nd IFLA General Conference and Council. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/papers/157-Ghosh_Das-en.pdf.

11.
Gilbert, N. (2009). Editor will quit over hoax paper. Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2009.571. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090615/full/news.2009.571.html crossref(new window)

12.
Gul, S., Wani, Z. A., & Majeed, I. (2008). Open access journals: A global perspective. Trends in Information Management, 4(1), 1-2.

13.
Harnad, S. (2007). Re: when did the Open Access movement 'officially' begin. American Scientist Open Access Forum. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access

14.
Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. Non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june

15.
Howard, F. (2003). Journal publishing is ripe for change. Electronic Library, The, 21(2), 165-168. crossref(new window)

16.
Kaiser, J. (2010). Free journals grow amid ongoing debate. Science, 329. doi:10.1126/science.329.5994.896 crossref(new window)

17.
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Bjork, B. C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). In M. Hermes-Lima (Ed.), The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6): e20961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961. crossref(new window)

18.
Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411(6837), 521. Retrieved from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/online-nature01/

19.
Libbenga, J. (2005). Dutch academics declare research free-for-all. The Register. Retrieved from http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/11/open_access_research/

20.
Loan, F., Rather, R., & Shah, J. (2008). Indian contribution to open access literature: A case study of DOAJ & OpenDOAR. Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal. Retrieved from http://www.white-clouds.com/iclc/cliej/cl26fayaz.pdf

21.
Mark, T., & Shearer, K. (2006). Institutional repositories: a review of content recruitment strategies. Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 72nd IFLA General Conference and Council, Seoul, Korea. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/papers/155-Mark_Sheareren.pdf

22.
McCulloch, E. (2006). Taking stock of open access: Progress and Issues. Library Review, 55(6). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530610674749 crossref(new window)

23.
Metcalfe, T. S. (2005). The rise and citation impact of astro-ph in major journals. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 37, 555-7. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0503519.pdf

24.
Morris, S. (2006). Personal view: When is a journal not a journal - A closer look at the DOAJ. Learned Publishing, 19. doi:10.1087/095315106775122565 crossref(new window)

25.
Mukherjee, B., & Mal, B.K. (2011). India's efforts in open access publishing. Library Philosophy and Practice.

26.
Pearce, J. M. (2012). The case for open source appropriate technology. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(3), 425-431. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9337-9 crossref(new window)

27.
Poynder, R. (2004). Poynder on point: Ten years after. Information Today, 21(9). Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/it/oct04/poynder.shtml

28.
PubMed Central: An NIH-Operated site for electronic distribution of Life Sciences research reports. NIH (1999). Retrieved from http://www.nih.gov/about/ director/pubmedcentral/pubmedcentral.htm

29.
Ramachandran, P.V., & Scaria, V. (2004). Open access publishing in the developing world: making a difference. Journal of Orthopaedics, 1(1). Retrieved from http:// www.jortho.org/2004/1/1/e1/index.htm

30.
Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behavior and attitudes. Aslib Proceedings, 57 (6). Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00012530510634226

31.
Sahu, D. K., & Parmar, R. C. (2006). Open access in India. Open Access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Retrieved from http://openmed.nic.in/1599/01/Open_Access_in_India.pdf.

32.
Sahu, D.K., & Parmar, R. (2006). The position around the world: Open access in India. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open access: Key strategic, technical, and economic aspects (pp. 26-32). Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

33.
Solomon, D.J., & Bo-Christer, B. Publishing fee in open access journals: Source of Funding and Factors Influencing Choice of Journal. Retrieved from http://www.openaccesspublishing.org/apc/preprint.pdf

34.
Suber, P. (2003). How should we define open access? SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 64. Retrieved from http://www.earlham.edu/peters/fos/newsletter/08-04-03.htm

35.
Vierkant, P. (2012). Visualizing open access; Global distribution of open access items. Retrieved from http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/libreas/21/vierkant-paul-54/PDF/vierkant.pdf

36.
Wells, A. (1999). Exploring the development of the independent, electronic, scholarly journal. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Sheffield. Retrieved from http://panizzi.shef.ac.uk/elecdiss/edl0001/index.html.

37.
Worlock, K. (2004). The Pros and Cons of Open Access. Nature Focus. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/34.html