JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Organizational Justice and the Intent to Share: Knowledge Sharing Practices among Forensic Experts in Turkey
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Organizational Justice and the Intent to Share: Knowledge Sharing Practices among Forensic Experts in Turkey
Can, Ahmet; Hawamdeh, Suliman;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Organizational climate and organization culture can be some of the leading factors in hindering knowledge sharing within the organization. It is generally accepted that successful knowledge management practice, including knowledge sharing, comes as a result of a conducive and knowledge sharing friendly environment. Organizations that promote and reward collective work generate a trustful and a more collaborative learning culture. The perception of fairness in an organization has been considered an important indicator of employee behavior, attitude, and motivation. This study investigates organizational justice perception and its impact on knowledge sharing practices among forensic experts in the Turkish National Police. The study findings revealed that senior officers, who are experts in the field, have the strongest organizational justice perception. Meanwhile, noncommissioned officers or technicians bear positive but comparatively weaker feelings about the existence of justice within the organization. The study argues that those who satisfy their career expectations tend to have a higher organizational justice perception.
 Keywords
Forensic Experts;Knowledge Sharing;Intention to share;Organization Justice;Turkish National Police;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436. crossref(new window)

2.
Aliei, M., Ashrafi, B., & Aghayan, S. (2011). Studying the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and knowledge sharing (case study knowledge-based organizations). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(3), 341-348. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/ 887725461?accountid=7113

3.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhi & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39).Heidelberg: Springer.

4.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. crossref(new window)

5.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975) Factors influencing intentions and the intention-behavior relation. Human Relations, 27, 1-15.

6.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (Vol. 278, p. 278). Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from http://www.getcited.org/pub/103368990

7.
Al-Zu'bi, H. A. (2011). Organizational citizenship behavior and impacts on knowledge sharing: An empirical study. International Business Research, 4(3), 221-227. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/875888565?accountid=7113

8.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G. & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social psychological forces and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.

9.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.

10.
Cakar, B. (2011). Factors affecting police officers' acceptance of GIS technologies: A study of the Turkish national police. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 131. Retrieved from http://search.proquest. com/docview/1012117755?accountid=7113.(1012117755).

11.
Cerrah, I. (2006). Almanac Turkey 2005: Security sector democratic oversight. In U. Cizre (Ed.), Almanak Turkiye 2005; Guvenlik Sektoru ve Demokratik Gozetim. Istanbul: TESEV.

12.
Chegini, M. G. (2009). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 1(2), 173. Retrieved from http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/article/GALE|A283835240/0b20f6d58f1b784e0d6791a0d798197c?u=txshracd2679 crossref(new window)

13.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 86, pp.278-321. crossref(new window)

14.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

15.
Crow, M. S., Lee, C. B., & Joo, J-J. (2012). Organizational justice and organizational commitment among South Korean police officers: An investigation of job satisfaction as a mediator. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(2), 402-423. crossref(new window)

16.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. crossref(new window)

17.
Dillon, A., & Morris, M. (1996). User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 3-32.

18.
George, J., & Jones, G. (2007). Organizational Behavior. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.

19.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-114. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/215879749?accountid=7113 crossref(new window)

20.
Greenberg, J. (1990a). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg and R.L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 389-435). New York: Academic Press, 1982.

21.
Greenberg, J. (1990b). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.

22.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Behavior in Organization: Understanding and managing the human side of work (8th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

23.
Hale, J. L., Greene, K., & Rubin, D. L. (1997). A test of the theory of reasoned action in the context of condom use and AIDS. Communication Reports, 10(1), 21-33. crossref(new window)

24.
Ibragimova, B. (2006). Propensity for knowledge sharing: An organizational justice perspective.? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton, TX.

25.
Jafari, P., & Bidarian, S. (2012). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1815-1820. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.905. crossref(new window)

26.
Jamaludin, Z. (2011). Developing a "Tough to Copy" competitive advantage (Organizational Commitment) through perceived organizational justice. Journal of Global Management, 1(1), 56-69.

27.
Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3-9. crossref(new window)

28.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

29.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855. crossref(new window)

30.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

31.
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85-97. crossref(new window)

32.
Ozcan, Y. Z., & Gultekin, R. (2000). Police and politics in Turkey. Web Journal of British Society of Criminology Proceedings III.

33.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836. crossref(new window)

34.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed). New York: The Free Press.

35.
Sillito-Walker, S. (2009). Delivering justice: Relational self-construal and the production of procedural, interpersonal, and informational fairness. The University of Utah. (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 198). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305006302?accountid=7113. (305006302).

36.
Simons, T., & Roberson, Q. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 432-443. doi:10. 1037/0021-9010.88.3.432 crossref(new window)

37.
Tao, D. (2008). Using theory of reasoned action (TRA) in understanding selection and use of information sources: An information resource selection and use model. (Unpublished dissertation thesis), University of Missouri-Columbia.

38.
Teece, D. J. (2000). Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: The Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 35-54. crossref(new window)

39.
Tombul, F. (2011). The impact of leadership styles and knowledge sharing on police officers' willingness to exert extra effort to provide better security: a study in the riot unit of the Turkish national police. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton, TX).

40.
Weller, L. D. (1995). The equity factor: a vital part of the quality equation. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(4), 44-50. crossref(new window)