JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Online Searching Behavior of Social Science Researchers` in IR Interfaces of E-journal Database Systems: A Study on JMI, JNU, and DU
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Online Searching Behavior of Social Science Researchers` in IR Interfaces of E-journal Database Systems: A Study on JMI, JNU, and DU
Kumar, Shailendra; Rai, Namrata;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the user`s online searching behavior in IR interfaces of e-journal database systems. The study is purely based on survey methods and tries to analyse the online searching behavior of respondents of social science disciplines who were doing research in three target central universities of Delhi (i.e. DU, JMI, and JNU). For measuring the responses of the respondents in IR interfaces of e-journal database systems, a total of 396 questionnaires were distributed among the students and out of all, 305 responses were used for the study. The findings of the study reveal that most of the students were not using all the facilities offered in IR interfaces of e-journal database systems for their retrieval process and also encourages menu based searches rather than command based searching.
 Keywords
e-journal database systems;IR interface;retrieval features;user study;online searching behavior;browsing;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Bates, M. J. (1986). Subject access in online catalogs: A design model, Journal of American Society for Information Science, 37(6), 357-76. crossref(new window)

2.
Bates, M. J. (1998). Indexing and access for digital libraries and the internet: Human, database and domain factors, Journal of American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1185-205. crossref(new window)

3.
Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface , Online Review, 13(5), 407-24. crossref(new window)

4.
Beall, J. (2008). The weaknesses of Full- Text Searching, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34 (5), 438-444. crossref(new window)

5.
Cove, J. F. & Walsh, B. C. (1988). Online Text Retrieval via Browsing, Information Processing and Management, 24(1), 31-37. crossref(new window)

6.
Diercks, T. (2003). Database evaluation report: Expanded Academic ASAP vs Academic Search Premier, Retrieved May 5, 2011 from http://liweb/hawaii.edu/uhmlib/news/surveys/eai_asap.htm

7.
Eastman, C. M. & Jansen, B. J. (2003). Coverage, relevance, and ranking: The impact of query operators on Web search engine results, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21(4), 383-411. crossref(new window)

8.
Espelt, Constanca (1998). Improving subject retrieval: User-friendly interfaces and effectiveness, Retrieved November 5, 2012 from www.ub.edu/bid/01espel1.htm

9.
Feuer, A., Savev, S. & Aslam, J. A. (2009). Implementing and evaluating Phrasal Query suggestion for Proximity Search, Information Systems, 34, 711-723. crossref(new window)

10.
Frants, V. I., Shapiro, J., Taksa, I. & Voiskunskii, V. G. (1999). Boolean Search: Current state and perspectives, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(1), 86-95. crossref(new window)

11.
Hildreth, Charles R. (1997). The use and understanding of Keyword Searching in a university online catalog, Information Technology Libraries, 16(6).

12.
Kostoff, R. N. (2010). Expanded information retrieval using full-text searching, Journal of Information Science, 36(1), 104-13. crossref(new window)

13.
Kristensen, J. (1993). Expanding End- Users' query statements for Free Text Searching with a searchaid Thesaurus, Information Processing and Management, 29(1), 733-44. crossref(new window)

14.
Larson, R., (1991). The Decline of Subject Searching: Long-Term Trends and Patterns of Index use in an Online Catalog, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(3), 197-215. crossref(new window)

15.
Lin, J. (2009). Is Searching Full text more effective than searching abstracts? BMC Bioinformatics, 1-15. Retrieved on September 11, 2010 from http://www .biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/46

16.
Martzoukou, K., (2008). Students' Attitudes towards web search engines- increasing appreciation of sophisticated search strategies. Libri, 58, 182-201.

17.
Okada, E. (n.d.). Basic database searching techniques (Information Commons), Libraries, Retrieved October 14, 2010 from. http://www.libraries.iub.edu/index.php?pageId=1480

18.
Pane, J. F. & Myers, B. A. (2000). Tabular and textual methods from selecting objects from groups, Proceedings of VL 2000: IEEE International Symposium on Visual Languages, Seattle, WA: IEEE Computer Society.10.1109.(157-164).

19.
Pollard, R. (1993). A Hyper-Text based thesaurus as a subject browsing aid for Bibliographic database, Information Processing and Management, 29(3), 345-57. crossref(new window)

20.
Sife, A. S., (2013). Web Search Behaviour of Postgraduate Students at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania, Lincoln: University of Nebraska,

21.
Sinh, N. H. & Nhung, H. T. H., (2012). Users' searching behaviour in using online databases at Vietnam National University - Ho Chi Minh City. Library Management, 33(8/9), 458-468. crossref(new window)

22.
Spink, A. e., (1999). Users' Interactions with the Excite Web Search Engine: A Query Reformulation and Relevance Feedback Analysis. Toronto, CAIS.

23.
Shiri, A. A., Revie, C. & Chowdhury, G. (2002). Thesaurus enhanced Search Interfaces, Journal of Information Science, 28(2), 111-22. crossref(new window)

24.
Shneiderman, B., Byrd, D. & Croft, W. B. (1998). Sorting out Searching: A User-Interface Framework for Text-searches, Communication of the ACM, 41(4), 95-98.

25.
Tenopir, C. & Hover, K. (1993). When is the same database not the same? Database differences among systems, Online, 17(2), 20-28.

26.
Thompson, R. H. & Croft, W. B. (1989). Support for browsing in an Intelligent Text Retrieval System, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 30, 639-68. crossref(new window)

27.
Weare, W. H. (1998). Find It on the Web using the Search concepts you already know, Library Media Connection, 56-58. Retrieved on September 12, 2010. From http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=14a109c6-9e36-4266-a1c1-a77a47480ea8%40sessionmgr104&vid=1&hid=125

28.
Wolfram, D., (2000). A Query-Level Examination of End-User Searching Behaviour on the Excite Search Engine,Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin.

29.
Xie, H. (2003). Supporting ease-of-use and user control: desired features and structure of Web-based online IR systems, Information Processing and Management, 39(6), 899-922. crossref(new window)

30.
Xie, H. & Cool, C. (2000). Ease of use versus user control: An evaluation of Web and non-Web interfaces of online databases, Online Information Review, 24(2), 102-15. crossref(new window)