JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
h-index, h-type Indices, and the Role of Corrected Quality Ratio
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
h-index, h-type Indices, and the Role of Corrected Quality Ratio
Tahira, Muzammil; Alias, Rose Alinda; Bakri, Arayti; Shabri, Ani;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study examines the foremost concerns related to most noted research performance index. The most popular and widely acceptable h-index underestimates the highly visible scientist, the middle order group, due to citation distribution issues. The study addresses this issue and uses 'Corrected Quality Ratio' (CQ) to check the implicit underpinnings as evident in h-index. CQ helps to incorporate the aspects of a good research performance indicator. This simple revision performs more intimately and logically to gauge the broader research impact for all groups and highly visible scientists with less statistical error.
 Keywords
Scientometric;Research Performance Evaluation;Corrected Quality Ratio;h-index;H';h-cpp;g-index;R-index;A-index;m-index;-index;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2010). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g- indices. Scientometrics, 82(2), 391-400. crossref(new window)

2.
Anderson, T. R., Hankin, R. K. S., & Killworth, P. D. (2008). Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics, 76, 577-588. crossref(new window)

3.
Bihui, J., LiMing, L., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855-963. crossref(new window)

4.
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H.D. (2011) A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 346-359. crossref(new window)

5.
Bornmann, L., Wallon, G., & Ledin, A. (2008). Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 149-156. crossref(new window)

6.
Bouabid, H., & Martin, B. (2009). Evaluation of Moroccan research using a bibliometric-based approach: Investigation of the validity of the h-index. Scientometrics, 78(2), 203-217. crossref(new window)

7.
Burrell, Q. L. (2007). On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin's A-index. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 170-177. crossref(new window)

8.
Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch Core. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 23-28.

9.
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 193-203. crossref(new window)

10.
Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275-1278. crossref(new window)

11.
Egghe, L. (2006a). An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8-9.

12.
Egghe, L. (2006b). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. crossref(new window)

13.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2008). An h-index weighted by citation impact. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 770-780. crossref(new window)

14.
Egghe, L. (2012). Remarks on the paper of A. De Visscher, "What does the g-index really measure?" Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 2118-2121. crossref(new window)

15.
Glanzel, W. (2006). On the opportunities and limitations of the h-index. Science Focus, 1(1), 10-11.

16.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-72. crossref(new window)

17.
Imperial, J., & Navarro, A. (2007). Usefulness of Hirsch's h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics, 71(2), 271-282. crossref(new window)

18.
Jin, B. H., Liang, L. M., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855-863. crossref(new window)

19.
Jin, B. H. (2006). h-Index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus, 1(1), 8-9.

20.
Lazaridis, L. (2010). Ranking university departments using the mean h-index. Scientometrics, 82(2), 11-16.

21.
Lehmann, S. A. D., Jackson, & Lautrup, B. (2008). A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance. Scientometrics 76(2), 369-390. crossref(new window)

22.
Lindsey, D. (1978). The corrected quality ratio: A composite index of scientific contribution to knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 349-354. crossref(new window)

23.
Luz, M. P. et. al. (2008). Institutional H-Index: The performance of a new metric in the evaluation of Brazilian Psychiatric Post-graduation Programs. Scientometrics, 77(2), 361-368. crossref(new window)

24.
Mehta, C. R., & Pate, N. R. (2011). IBM SPSS Exact Tests. IBM.P.236. Retrieved on September, 30, 2013, from http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/jcr/jcr?pointofentry= home&sid= 4bowr-74js6miuqyl3av.

25.
Moed, H. F. (2008). UK research assessment exercise: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity? Scientometrics, 74(1), 153-161. crossref(new window)

26.
Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2010). The h-index: A broad review of a new bibliometric indicator. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 681-705. crossref(new window)

27.
Oppenheim, C. (2007). Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 297-301. crossref(new window)

28.
Parthap, G. (2010). The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics, 84(1), 167-172. crossref(new window)

29.
Riikonen, P., & Vihinen, M. (2008) National research contributions: A case study on Finnish biomedical research. Scientometrics, 77(2), 207-222. crossref(new window)

30.
Rousseau, R. (2006). New developments related to the Hirsch index. Industrial Sciences and Technology, Belgium. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/6376/.

31.
Cole, S., & Cole, J.R. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University Press.

32.
Schreiber, M. (2010). Revisiting the g-index: The average number of citations in the g-core. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 169-174. crossref(new window)

33.
Schreiber, M. (2010). Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to highly cited papers. Retrieved on October 31, 2013, from arxiv.org/pdf/1005.5227 crossref(new window)

34.
Schreiber, M. (2013). Do we need the g-index? Retrieved on October 27, 2013, from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1301/1301.4028.pdf

35.
Schubert, A., & Glanzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 179-184. crossref(new window)

36.
Spizman, L., & Weinstein. M. A. (2008). A note on utilizing the geometric mean: When, why and how the forensic economist should employ the geometric mean. Journal of Legal Economics, 15(1), 43-55.

37.
Tahira, M., Alias, R. A., & Bakri, A. (2013). Scientometric assessment of engineering in Malaysian universities. Scientometrics, 96(3), 865-879. crossref(new window)

38.
Tol, R. S. J. (2009). The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics, 80(2), 319-326.

39.
Willmott, C. J., & Matsuura, K. (2005). Advantages of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) over the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30, 79-82. crossref(new window)

40.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143. crossref(new window)

41.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491-502. crossref(new window)

42.
Vinkler, P. (2007). Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science, 33, 481-491. crossref(new window)

43.
Zhang, C. T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for Excess Citations. PLOS ONE 4(5), e5429. crossref(new window)

44.
Zhang, C.T. (2013). The h' Index, effectively improving the h-index based on the citation distribution. PLOS ONE, 8(4), e59912. crossref(new window)