JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Sentiment Analysis of User-Generated Content on Drug Review Websites
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Sentiment Analysis of User-Generated Content on Drug Review Websites
Na, Jin-Cheon; Kyaing, Wai Yan Min;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study develops an effective method for sentiment analysis of user-generated content on drug review websites, which has not been investigated extensively compared to other general domains, such as product reviews. A clause-level sentiment analysis algorithm is developed since each sentence can contain multiple clauses discussing multiple aspects of a drug. The method adopts a pure linguistic approach of computing the sentiment orientation (positive, negative, or neutral) of a clause from the prior sentiment scores assigned to words, taking into consideration the grammatical relations and semantic annotation (such as disorder terms) of words in the clause. Experiment results with 2,700 clauses show the effectiveness of the proposed approach, and it performed significantly better than the baseline approaches using a machine learning approach. Various challenging issues were identified and discussed through error analysis. The application of the proposed sentiment analysis approach will be useful not only for patients, but also for drug makers and clinicians to obtain valuable summaries of public opinion. Since sentiment analysis is domain specific, domain knowledge in drug reviews is incorporated into the sentiment analysis algorithm to provide more accurate analysis. In particular, MetaMap is used to map various health and medical terms (such as disease and drug names) to semantic types in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Semantic Network.
 Keywords
Sentiment classification;drug reviews;linguistic approach;health and medical domains;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Aronson, A. R., & Lang, F. M. (2010). An overview of MetaMap: Historical perspective and recent advances. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA), 17, 229-236. crossref(new window)

2.
Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010). SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010) (pp. 2200–2204).

3.
Bodenreider, O., & McCray, A. T. (2003). Exploring semantic groups through visual approaches. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36, 414-432. crossref(new window)

4.
de Marneffe, M.-C., MacCartney, B., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 449-454).

5.
Denecke, K. (2008). Accessing medical experiences and information. Proceedings of the Workshop on Mining Social Data, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

6.
Ding, X., Liu, B., & Yu, P. S. (2008). A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining (pp. 231-240). New York: ACM.

7.
Huang, S., Niu, Z., & Shi, C. (2014). Automatic construction of domain-specific sentiment lexicon based on constrained label propagation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 56, 191-200. crossref(new window)

8.
Jaloba, A. (2009). The club no one wants to join: Online behaviour on a breast cancer discussion forum. First Monday, 14(7).

9.
Jo, Y., & Oh, A. H. (2011). Aspect and sentiment unification model for online review analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (pp. 815-824). Hong Kong.

10.
Kim, S., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Oh, A., & Liu S. (2013). A hierarchical aspect-sentiment model for online reviews. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 526-533).

11.
Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.

12.
Lu, Y., Castellanos, M., Dayal, U., & Zhai, C. X. (2011). Automatic construction of a context-aware sentiment lexicon: An optimization approach. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2011) (pp. 347-356). Hyderabad, India.

13.
Na, J.-C., Kyaing, W. Y. M., Khoo, C., Foo, S., Chang, Y.-K., and Theng, Y.-L. (2012). Sentiment classification of drug reviews using a rule-based linguistic approach. Proceedings of ICADL (International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries) ‘2012 (pp. 189-198). Taipei, Taiwan.

14.
Nikfarjam, A., & Gonzalez, G. H. (2011). Pattern mining for extraction of mentions of adverse drug reactions from user comments. Proceedings of AMIA Annual Symposium (pp. 1019-1026).

15.
Niu, Y., Zhu, X., Li, J., & Hirst, G. (2005). Analysis of polarity information in medical text. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium (AMIA) (pp. 570-574).

16.
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood modality. 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

17.
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2), 1-135. crossref(new window)

18.
Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine-learning techniques. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 79-86).

19.
Polanyi, L., & Zaenen, A. (2006). Contextual valence shifters. In J. G. Shanahan, Y. Qu, & J. Wiebe (Eds.), Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications (pp. 1-10), Information Retrieval Series Volume 20. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

20.
Qiu, G., Liu, B., Bu, J., & Chen, C. (2009). Expanding domain sentiment lexicon through double propagation. Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1199-1204). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

21.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

22.
Sarasohn-Kahn, J. (2008). The wisdom of patients: Health care meets online social media. California Healthcare Foundation, Oakland. Retrieved from http://www.chcf.org/publications/2008/04/the-wisdom-of-patients-health-care-meets-online-social-media.

23.
Schraefel, M. C., White, R. W., André, P., & Tan, D. (2009). Investigating Web search strategies and forum use to support diet and weight loss. Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘09) (pp. 3829-3834).

24.
Shaikh, M. A. M., Prendinger, H., & Ishizuka, M. (2008). Sentiment assessment of text by analyzing linguistic features and contextual valence assignment. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 22(6), 558-601. crossref(new window)

25.
Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S., & Ogilvie, D. M. (1966). General Inquirer: a computer approach to content analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

26.
Tsytsarau, M., Palpanas, T., & Denecke, K. (2011). Scalable detection of sentiment-based contradictions. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Knowledge Diversity on the Web.

27.
Wiebe, J., & Riloff, E. (2005). Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing) (pp. 486-497).

28.
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 347-354).

29.
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2009). Recognizing contextual polarity: An exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 35(3), 399-433. crossref(new window)

30.
Xia, L., Gentile, A. L., Munro, J., & Iria, J. (2009). Improving patient opinion mining through multistep classification. Lectures Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 5729, 70-76.