JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Contribution of Journals to Academic Disciplines
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Contribution of Journals to Academic Disciplines
Lee, Hye-Young;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This research uses a new approach to analyze the extent of influence journal papers have on the progress of varied research fields by estimation of subject-based influence on research other than impact factor that relies on citation index. It is initiated with the hypothesis that earlier established citation relations between journal and citing paper, which reveals the research field that contains the highest citation index and hence has received the greatest contribution from a particular journal, would have inconsistent contribution to the research field over the year of journal publication. The target research is primarily 128 journal papers and 4,123 citing papers from Information Systems Research published in the years 2001, 2004, 2007, and 2010. The characteristics of citation history and hallmarks of research field of citing papers were studied and analysis on significant distinction between citing fields based on the year of publication was performed. The analysis results show the order of citation rate to be highest from Computer Science (2,221 cases), Business & Economics (2,191 cases), and Information Science & Library Science (1,901 cases). The citation history of the journal, nonetheless, indicates increase in citation during 2-3 years after the earliest publication till it achieves constant citation. The statistical analysis shows significant variation in citing fields in accordance with the publication year; especially in 2010, journal contribution has increased in the fields of Business & Economics, Operations Research & Management Science, and Health Care Sciences & Services but, however, is reduced in Education & Educational Research and Social Sciences - Other Topics.
 Keywords
citation analysis;contribution to progress of research fields;subject-cluster;ANOVA;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Astrom, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957 crossref(new window)

2.
Barnett, G. A., et al. (2011). Citations among communication journals and other disciplines: A network analysis. Scientometrics, 88(2), 449-469. crossref(new window)

3.
Bellis, N. D. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, MD, US: Scarecrow Press.

4.
Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. C&RL News, 68(5).

5.
Centre for Science and Technology Studies, L. U. (2014). VOSviewer. Retrieved from http://www.vosviewer.com/

6.
Education rankings. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/rankings

7.
Elsevier (2014). SCOPUS. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com

8.
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama: Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93. crossref(new window)

9.
Gonzalez-Pereira, B., et al. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379-391. crossref(new window)

10.
Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs. Scientometrics, 86(3), 705-725. crossref(new window)

11.
Heersmink, R., et al. (2011). Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 241-249. crossref(new window)

12.
Hu, C.-P., et al. (2011). A journal co-citation analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 86(3), 657-670. crossref(new window)

13.
Huang, M. H., & Chang, C. P. (2014). Detecting research fronts in OLED field using bibliographic coupling with sliding window. Scientometrics 98(3), 1721-1744. crossref(new window)

14.
Lariviere, V., et al. (2009). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858-862. crossref(new window)

15.
Lee, P.-C., and & Su, H.-N. (2011). Quantitative mapping of scientific research - The case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(1), 132-151. crossref(new window)

16.
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2012). Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data. Journal of Informetrics 6(2), 318-332. crossref(new window)

17.
Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2010). Geographic characteristics of the growth of informetrics literature 1987-2008. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 591-601. crossref(new window)

18.
Persson (2011). Bibexcel: A tool-box developed by Olle Persson. Retrieved from http://www8.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel/

19.
Pluzhenskaia, M. A. (2007). Publication and citation analysis of disciplinary connections of library and information science faculty in accredited schools. Ann Arbor: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 3270003:180.

20.
Shin, E.-J. (2009). The dispersion phenomenon of journal citations in a digital environment. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 26(2), 211-222. crossref(new window)

21.
Su, H.-N., & Lee, P.-C. (2010). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics, 85(1), 65-79. crossref(new window)

22.
Thomson, I. (2014). Journal citation reports: JCR social sciences. Retrieved from http://webofknowledge.com/JCR

23.
Thomson, I. (2014). Web of Science. Retrieved from http://apps.webofknowledge.com/

24.
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Discarding the ‘Basic Science/Applied Science’ dichotomy: A knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1842-1852. crossref(new window)

25.
University rankings. QS Top Universities. Retrieved from http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings

26.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. crossref(new window)

27.
Waaijer, C. J. F., et al. (2011). On the map: Nature and Science editorials. Scientometrics, 86(1), 99-112. crossref(new window)

28.
Waltman, L., et al. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. crossref(new window)