JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Impact of Self-Citations on Impact Factor: A Study Across Disciplines, Countries and Continents
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Impact of Self-Citations on Impact Factor: A Study Across Disciplines, Countries and Continents
Pandita, Ramesh; Singh, Shivendra;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Purpose. : The present study is an attempt to find out the impact of self-citations on Impact Factor (IF) across disciplines. The study examines the number of research articles published across 27 major subject fields covered by SCImago, encompassing as many as 310 sub-disciplines. The study evaluates aspects like percentage of self-citations across each discipline, leading self-citing countries and continents, and the impact of self-citation on their IF. Scope. : The study is global in nature, as it evaluates the trend of self-citation and its impact on IF of all the major subject disciplines of the world, along with countries and continents. IF has been calculated for the year 2012 by analyzing the articles published during the years 2010 and 2011. Methodology/Approach. : The study is empirical in nature; as such, statistical and mathematical tools and techniques have been employed to work out the distribution across disciplines. The evaluation has been purely under-taken on the secondary data, retrieved from SCImago Journal and Country Ranking. Findings. : Self-citations play a very significant part in inflating IF. All the subject fields under study are influenced by the practice of self-citation, ranging from 33.14% to 52.38%. Compared to the social sciences and the humanities, subject fields falling under the purview of pure and applied sciences have a higher number of self-citations, but a far lesser percentage than the social sciences and humanities. Upon excluding self-citations, a substantial amount of change was observed in the IF of subject fields under study, as 18 (66.66%) out of 27 subjects fields faced shuffle in their rankings. Variation in rankings based on IF with and without self-citation was observed at subject level, country level, and continental level.
 Keywords
Citation Analysis;Self-citations;Author self-citations;Journal self-citations;Impact Factor;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Adair, J. G., & Vohra, N. (2003). The explosion of knowledge, references, and citations: Psychology’s unique response to a crisis. American Psychologist, 58 (1), 15-23. crossref(new window)

2.
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56 (2), 235-246. crossref(new window)

3.
Anseel, F., Duyck, W., De Baene, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Journal Impact Factors and self-citations: implications for psychology journals. American Psychologist, 59 (1), 49-51. crossref(new window)

4.
Bonzi, S., & Snyder, H. W. (1990, January). Patterns of self-citation across fields of inquiry. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting 27, 204-207.

5.
Campanario, J. M. (2011). Large increases and decreases in journal Impact Factors in only one year: The effect of journal self-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 230-235. crossref(new window)

6.
Ferrara, E., & Romero, A. E. (2013). Scientific impact evaluation and the effect of self-citations: Mitigating the bias by discounting the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(11), 2332-2339. crossref(new window)

7.
Frandsen, T. F. (2007). Journal self-citations analyzing the JIF mechanism. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 47-58. crossref(new window)

8.
Gami, A. S., Montori, V. M., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2004). Author self-citation in the diabetes literature. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170 (13), 1925-1927. crossref(new window)

9.
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108-11. Retrieved from http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v6p468y1983.pdf crossref(new window)

10.
Garfield, E., & Welljams-Dorof, A. (1992). Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making. Science and Public Policy, 19 (5), 321-327.

11.
Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-9. crossref(new window)

12.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (46), 16569-16572. crossref(new window)

13.
Hyland, K. (2003). Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 251-9. crossref(new window)

14.
Journal citation reports: Impact factor (2015). Web of Knowledge. Retrieved from http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/help/h_impfact.htm

15.
Kaltenborn, K. F., & Kuhn, K. (2004). The journal Impact Factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas, 96 (7), 460-476.

16.
King, M. M., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J., Bergstrom, C. T., & West, J. D. (2015). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Working paper. Retrieved from http://www.eigenfactor.org/gender/self-citation/SelfCitation.pdf

17.
Moed, H. F., & Van der Velde, J. G. M. (1993). Bibliometric profiles of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands. Report submitted to Netherlands Foundation for Chemical Research, Netherlands.

18.
Nederhof, A. J., Meijer, R. F., Moed, H. F., & Van Raan, A. F. (1993). Research performance indicators for university departments: A study of an agricultural university. Scientometrics, 27 (2), 157-178. crossref(new window)

19.
Neuberger, J., & Counsell, C. (2002). Impact Factors: Uses and abuses. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14 (3), 209-211. crossref(new window)

20.
SCImago (2007). SJR - SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved from http://www.scimagojr.com

21.
Sevinc, A. (2004). Manipulating Impact Factor. An unethical issue or an editor’s choice. Swiss Medical Weekly, 134, 410.

22.
Tagliacozzo, R. (1977). Self-citations in scientific literature. Journal of Documentation, 33 (4), 251-265. crossref(new window)

23.
Van Leeuwen, T. N., Rinia, E. J., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1996). Bibliometric profiles of academic physics research in the Netherlands. Research Report to the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), Physics Division (FOM), Utrecht. Report CWTS, 96-09.

24.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The impact of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Scientometrics, 42 (3), 423-428. crossref(new window)

25.
White, H. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2), 87-108. crossref(new window)