JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice
Dankasa, Jacob;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Despite the number of developed theories, it still remains a difficult task for some established and emerging scholars in various academic fields to clearly articulate new theories from research studies. This paper reviews and collates the views of scholars on what a theory is and how a good theory can be developed. It explains the concept of a theory, and the different components that make up a theory. The paper discusses the different processes of theory development by emphasizing what theory is and what theory is not. This review found that scholars differ in their definition of a theory, which leads to using terms such as model, paradigm, framework, and theory interchangeably. It found the lack of theoretical constructs in a study to be one of the factors which explains why articles are rejected for publication. This paper may be of benefit to established researchers who may be struggling with theory development, and especially younger academics who are the future of scholarship in various academic fields, particularly in information science.
 Keywords
Theory Development;Information Science;Review;Developing a Theory;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Aspray, W. (2011). The history of information science and other traditional information domains: Models for future research. Libraries & the Cultural Record, 46(2), 230-248. doi: 10.5555/lcr.2011.46.2.230 crossref(new window)

2.
Babbie, E. (1992). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

3.
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515.

4.
Bates, M. J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050. crossref(new window)

5.
Borko, H. (1968). Information science: What is it? American Documentation, 19(1), 3-5. doi: 10.1002/asi.5090190103 crossref(new window)

6.
Buckland, M. (1991). Information and information systems. Westport, CN: Greenwood.

7.
Buckland, M. (2012). What kind of science can information science be? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 1-7. doi: 10.1002/asi.21656 crossref(new window)

8.
Chatman, E. A. (1992). The information world of retired women. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

9.
Chatman, E. A. (1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 50(3), 207-217. crossref(new window)

10.
Chatman, E. A. (2000). Framing social life in theory and research. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, 3-17.

11.
Cole, C. (2011). A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1216-1231. doi: 10.1002/asi.21541 crossref(new window)

12.
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12-32. crossref(new window)

13.
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 480-499. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.24351453 crossref(new window)

14.
Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46. crossref(new window)

15.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on “what theory is not.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 391-397. crossref(new window)

16.
Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building (revised ed.). New York: Free Press.

17.
Durante, C. (2011). Active citizenship in Italian cohousing: A preliminary reflection. Everyday Life in the Segmented City, 11, 307-333. crossref(new window)

18.
Garver, N. (2008). What theory is. Journal of Folklore Research, 45(1), 63-70. crossref(new window)

19.
Gibbs, J. P. (1972). Sociological theory construction. IL: Dryden Press.

20.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative inquiry. Chicago: Aldine.

21.
Goodall, K., Newman, L., & Ward, P. (2014). Improving access to health information for older migrants by using grounded theory and social network analysis to understand their information behaviour and digital technology use. European Journal of Cancer Care, 23(6), 728-738. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12241 crossref(new window)

22.
Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

23.
Higgins, E. T. (2004). Making a theory useful: Lessons handed down. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 138-145. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_7 crossref(new window)

24.
Hjørland, B. (1998). Theory and metatheory of information science: A new interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 606–621. crossref(new window)

25.
Huy, Q. N. (2012). Improving the odds of publishing inductive qualitative research in premier academic journals. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(2), 282-287. doi: 10.1177/0021886312438864 crossref(new window)

26.
Jaeger, P. T., & Burnett, G. (2010). Information worlds: Social context, technology, and information behavior in the age of the Internet. New York: Routledge.

27.
Kalnins, A. (2007). Sample selection and theory development: Implications of firms’ varying abilities to appropriately select new ventures. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246-1264. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586802 crossref(new window)

28.
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195-229.

29.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42(5), 361-371. crossref(new window)

30.
Kuhn, T. (1959). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), The third University of Utah research conference on the identification of scientific talent. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

31.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (revised ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

32.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

33.
Michie, S., & Prestwich, A. (2010). Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychology, 29(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016939 crossref(new window)

34.
Mills, C. W. (1959). On intellectual craftsmanship [Appendix]. In The sociological imagination (pp. 195-226). London: Oxford University Press.

35.
Odi, A. (1982). Creative research and theory building in library and information sciences. College and Research Libraries, 43(4), 312-19. crossref(new window)

36.
Olsen, M. E., Lodwick, D. G., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). Viewing the world ecologically. CO: Westview Press Boulder.

37.
Osareh, F., & Wilson, C. S. (1997). Third World Countries (TWC) research publications by disciplines: A country-by-country citation analysis. Scientometrics, 39(3), 253-266. crossref(new window)

38.
Patterson, T. L, Shaw W. S, & Masys, D. R. (1997) Improving health through computer self-help programs: Theory and practice. In P. F. Brennan, S. F. Schneider, & E. Tornquist (Eds.), Information networks for community health (pp. 219-246). New York: Springer.

39.
Pettigrew, K. E., & McKechnie, L. E. (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 62-73. crossref(new window)

40.
Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35(43-78).

41.
Rindova, V. (2011). Moving from ideas to a theoretical contribution: Comments on the process of developing theory in organizational research. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(2), 19-21. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03221.x crossref(new window)

42.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation theory. New York: Free Press.

43.
Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051-1063. crossref(new window)

44.
Schroeder, R. G. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on theory development in operations management. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 354-356. crossref(new window)

45.
Schwandt, T.A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

46.
Sharma, R. (2011). Research methods and the relevance of the IS discipline: a critical analysis of the role of methodological pluralism. Journal of Information Technology, 26(4), 306-312. doi: 10.1057/jit.2011.27 crossref(new window)

47.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication.

48.
Sin, S. J. (2011). Towards Agency–Structure integration: A person-in-environment (PIE) framework for modelling individual-level information behaviours and outcomes. In A. Spink and J. Heinström (Eds.), New directions in information behaviour (pp. 181-209). UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

49.
Spink, A., & Heinström, J. (Eds.). (2011). New directions in information behaviour. UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

50.
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371-384. crossref(new window)

51.
Urquhart, C., & Fernández, W. (2013). Using grounded theory method in information systems: The researcher as blank slate and other myths. Journal of Information Technology, 28(3), 224-236. doi:10.1057/jit.2012.34 crossref(new window)

52.
Vogt, W. P. (1993). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A non-technical guide for the social sciences. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications

53.
Wacker, J. G. (2004). A theory of formal conceptual definitions: Developing theory-building measurement instruments. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 629-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.002 crossref(new window)

54.
Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385-390. doi: 10.2307/2393789 crossref(new window)

55.
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4308371 crossref(new window)

56.
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45-55. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2011.51 crossref(new window)