Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Global Tribology Research Output (1998 - 2012): A Macro Level Scientometric Study
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Global Tribology Research Output (1998 - 2012): A Macro Level Scientometric Study
Elango, B.; Rajendran, P.;
  PDF(new window)
The aim of this study is to compare country output and citation impact as well as to assess the level of interdisciplinarity in the field of tribology research during the period 1998-2012, based on the SCOPUS database. Macro-level scientometric indicators such as growth rate, share of international collaborative papers, citation per paper, share of un-cited papers, and publication efficiency index were employed. Further, the Simpson Index of Diversity was used to measure the level of interdisciplinarity. The performance of top countries contributing more than 1000 papers during the study period was discussed. Contributions and share of continents and countries by income groups were examined. Further research contributions and citation impact of selected country groups were analyzed. This study reveals that high levels of interdisciplinarity exist in tribology research. Asia outperforms the other world regions and China contributes most of the papers (25%), while the United States receives most of the citations (22%).
Bibliometrics;Tribology;Macro Level Study;Interdisciplinarity;
 Cited by
Adams, J., & Pendlebury, D. (2011). Global research report: Materials science & technology. Retrieved from

Al, U., & Taskin, Z. (2015). Relationship between economic development and intellectual production. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(1), 25-35. crossref(new window)

Asplund, K., Eriksson, M., & Persson, O. (2012). Country comparisons of human stroke research since 2001: A bibliometric study. Stroke, 43, 830-837. crossref(new window)

Bojović, S. et al. (2014). An overview of forestry journals in the period 2006–2010 as basis for ascertaining research trends. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1331-1346. crossref(new window)

Borsi, B., & Schubert, A. (2011). Agrifood research in Europe: A global perspective. Scientometrics, 86(1), 133-154. crossref(new window)

Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z. et al. (2012). International collaboration in medical research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003-2007). Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2223-2238. crossref(new window)

Choi, D. G., Lee, H., & Sung, T. K. (2011). Research profiling for ‘standardization and innovation.’ Scientometrics, 88(1), 259-278. crossref(new window)

Clarke, A. et al. (2007). A bibliometric overview of public health research in Europe. European Journal of Public Health, 17(Sup.1), 43-49. crossref(new window)

Elango, B., Rajendran, P., & Bornmann, L. (2013). Global nanotribology research output (1996-2010): A scientometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e81094. crossref(new window)

Elango, B., Rajendran, P., & Bornmann, L. (2015). A scientometric analysis of international collaboration and literature growth at the macro level. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 20(2), 41-50.

Elango, B., Rajendran, P., & Manickaraj, J. (2013). Tribology research output in BRIC countries: A scientometric dimension. Library Philosophy and Practice, Paper 935.

Farris, T.N. (1997). Tribology. In J.E. Pope (Ed.), Rules of thumb for mechanical engineers (pp. 226-237). Texas: Gulf Professional Publishing.

Fiala, D. (2013). Suborganizations of institutions in library and information science journals. Information, 4, 351-366. crossref(new window)

Garg, K. C. et al. (2010). Scientometric profile of genetics and heredity research in India. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57(3), 196-206.

Glänzel, W. (2000). A bibliometric analysis of co-authorship patterns of Eleven East Central European Countries in the 90s. Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Berlin.

Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115. crossref(new window)

Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field: A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Retrieved from

Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193. crossref(new window)

Guan, J., & Ma, M. (2007). A bibliometric study of China’s semiconductor literature compared with other major Asian countries. Scientometrics, 70(1), 107-124. crossref(new window)

Gupta, B. M., & Bala, A. (2011). A scientometric analysis of Indian research output in medicine during 1999-2008. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, 2(1), 87-100. crossref(new window)

Huffman, M. D. et al. (2013). Global cardiovascular research output, citations, and collaborations: A time-trend, bibliometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e83440. crossref(new window)

Igami, M., & Saka, A. (2007). Capturing the evolving nature of science, the development of new scientific indicators and the mapping of science. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2007/1. Retrieved from

Ivancheva, L. (2008). Scientometrics today: A methodological overview. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 47-56. crossref(new window)

Jost, P. (1966). Lubrication (tribology) – A report on the present position and industry’s needs. Dept. of Education and Science (H.M. Stationary Office).

Kademani, B. S. et al. (2013). Publication trends in materials science: A global perspective. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1275-1295. crossref(new window)

Kalz, M., & Specht, M. (2013). Assessing the crossdisciplinarity of technology-enhanced learning with science overlay maps and diversity measures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 415-427.

Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ramesh Babu, B. (2011). Publication trend on nanotechnology among G15 countries: A bibliometric study. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 5(1), 61-80. crossref(new window)

Leta, J., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2013). A macro-level study of science in Brazil: Seven years later. EncontrosBibli, 18(36), 51-66.

Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2013). Citation analysis with medical subject headings (MeSH) using the Web of Knowledge: A new routine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1076-1080. crossref(new window)

Luo, J., & Matthews, K. R. W. (2013). Globalization of stem cell science: An examination of current and past collaborative research networks. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e73598. crossref(new window)

Mang, T., Bobzin, K., & Bartel, T. (2011). Industrial tribology: Tribosystems, friction, wear and surface engineering, lubrication. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (Eds.) (2004). Editors’ introduction. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (pp. 1-15). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Patra, S. K., & Chand, P. (2009). Library and information science research in SAARC and ASEAN countries as reflected through LISA. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 56(1), 41-51.

Plotnikova, T., & Rake, B. (2014). Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: exploration of country-level determinants. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1173-1202. crossref(new window)

Rajendran, P., Elango, B., & Manicakraj, J. (2014). Publication trends and citation impact of tribology research in India: A scientometric study. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 2(1), 22-34. crossref(new window)

Sombatsompop, N., et al. (2011). Research productivity and impact of ASEAN countries and universities in the field of energy and fuel. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 16(1), 35-46.

Sorenko A, Bontis N., & Grant, J. (2009). A scientometric analysis of the proceedings of the McMaster of world congress on the management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996-2008 period. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 8-21. crossref(new window)

Soteriades, E. S., et al. (2005). Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995-2002). FASEB Journal, 20, 29-34.

Tan, K. C., Goudarzlou, A., & Chakrabarty, A. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of service research from ASIA. Managing Service Quality, 20(1), 89-101. crossref(new window)

Tocha, E. A. (2006). Bridging length and time scales by AFM-based nanotribology: Applications to nanostructured ceramics and polymer surfaces (Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente).

UNESCO (2001). The state of science and technology in the world, 1996-1997. Retrieved from

van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung, 1, 20-29.

van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis measurement. Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3, 50-62. crossref(new window)

Vinkler, P. (1988). An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics, 13(5-6), 239-259. crossref(new window)

Wang, H. et al. (2013). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of GPS research from 1991-2010. Scientometrics, 95(1), 35-44. crossref(new window)

Wiysonge, C. S. et al. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of childhood immunization research productivity in Africa since the onset of the Expanded Program on Immunization in 1974. BMC Medicine, 11:66. Retrieved from