JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Electronic Information Resources (EIR) Adoption in Private University Libraries: The Moderating Effect of Productivity and Relative Advantage on Perceived Usefulness
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Electronic Information Resources (EIR) Adoption in Private University Libraries: The Moderating Effect of Productivity and Relative Advantage on Perceived Usefulness
Izuagbe, Roland; Hamzat, Saheed Abiola; Joseph, Edith Idowu;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The study tested a hybrid model with constructs drawn from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory in order to examine the moderating effect of productivity and relative advantage (RA) on perceived usefulness (PU) vis-à-vis electronic information resources (EIR) adoption in private university libraries in Ogun and Osun States of Nigeria. The descriptive research design was adopted in the study. The population consisted of 61 (55.0%) librarians and 50 (45.0%) library officers (totaling 116—100%) in Babcock University, Bells University, Covenant University, Bowen University, Oduduwa University, and Redeemer`s University. Purposive sampling procedure was adopted after which total enumeration was used since the total population is small. The questionnaire was used for data collection. Of the 116 copies of the questionnaire administered, 111 (95.7%) were found usable. The instrument was structured based on a 4-point Likert agreement scale of Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics like tables of frequency counts and percentage. The findings revealed that productivity and relative advantage are significant moderators of perceived usefulness of EIR adoption in private university libraries in Ogun and Osun States, Nigeria.
 Keywords
Adoption;electronic information resources (EIR);perceived usefulness;productivity;relative advantage;private university libraries;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Abadi, H. R. D., Ranjbarian, B., & Zade, F. K. (2012). Investigate the customers’ behavioural intention to use mobile banking based on TPB, TAM and perceived risk (A case study in Meli Bank). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(10), 245-58.

2.
Adeniran, P. (2013). Usage of electronic resources by undergraduates at the Redeemer’s University, Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Library and Information Science, 5(10), 319-24.

3.
Agarwal, R. J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-301. crossref(new window)

4.
Ahmad, M., & Panda, K.C. (2013). Awareness and use of electronic information resources by the faculty members of Indian institutes in Dubai international academic city (DIAC): A survey. International Research Journal of Computer Science and Information Systems (IRJCSIS), 2(1), 8-17. Retrieved from http://www.interesjournals.org/IRJCSIS.

5.
Aina, L. O. (2002). Research in information sciences: An African perspective. Ibadan: Stirling-Horden Publishers.

6.
Aina, R. F. (2014). Awareness, accessibility and use of electronic databases among academic staff of Babcock University Business School. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(6), 255-67. crossref(new window)

7.
Al Fadhli, M .S., & Jonhson, I. M. (2006). Electronic document delivery in academic and research organisations in the Gulf States: A case study of Kuwait. Information Development, 22(1), 32-37. crossref(new window)

8.
Al-Shafi, S., & Weerakkody, V. (2009). Understanding citizens’ behavioural intention in the adoption of e-government services in the state of Qatar. 17th European Conference on Information Systems. Verona: ECIS.

9.
Ani, O. E., & Ahiauzu, B. (2008). Towards effective development of electronic information resources in Nigerian University Libraries. Library Management, 29(6/7), 504-14. crossref(new window)

10.
Ayele, A. A., & Sreenivasarao, V. (2013). A case study of acceptance and use of electronic library services in universities based on SO-UTAUT Model. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 1(4), 903-11.

11.
Bugembe, J. (2010). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude and actual usage of a new financial management system: A case study of Uganda national examinations board. (Ph.D. Dissertation, Makerere University). Retrieved from http://www.makir.mak.ac.ug.

12.
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. H. (2002) Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 191-229.

13.
Chen, L. D., Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), 705-19. crossref(new window)

14.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. crossref(new window)

15.
Damilola, O. A. (2013). Use of electronic resources by distance students in Nigeria: the case of the National Open University, Lagos and Ibadan Study Centres. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 915 (1-12). Retrieved from www.digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2274andcontent=libphilprac.

16.
Das, P., & Maharana, R. K. (2013). Access, awareness and use of electronic information resources by research scholars of Berhampur University: A study. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(2), 254-59.

17.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-40. Retrieved from http://iris.nyit.edu/-kkhoo/Spring2008/Topics/TAM/PercieveUsefulness_MIS.pdf. crossref(new window)

18.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Social Psych., 22(14), 1111–32. crossref(new window)

19.
Dongardive, P. (2011). International journals of information retrieval and research. Biometrics: Electronic resources management in Jaykar library, University of Pune, India. IGI Global, 1(4), 1-22.

20.
Dongardive, P. (2015). Use of electronic information resources at College of Dry Land Agriculture and Natural Resources, Mekelle University, Ethiopia. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 7(3), 55-68. crossref(new window)

21.
Dulle, F. W., Minish-Majanja, M. K., & Cloete, L. M. (2010). Factors influencing the adoption of open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities. In World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenberg, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/hg/papers/ifla76/138-dulle-en.pdf.

22.
Dwirantwi, E. A. (2012). Organizational culture and its effect on productivity; The case study of La Community Bank. (CE Master's thesis, Institute of Distance Learning, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology).

23.
Etim, F. E. (2004). Resource sharing in the Digital Age: Prospects and problems in African universities. Library Philosophy & Practice, 9(1), 24-31.

24.
Eze, J. U., & Uzoigwe, C. U. (2013). The place of academic libraries in Nigerian University education: Contributing to the ‘Education for All’ initiative. International Journal of Academic Library and Information Science, 5(10), 432-38.

25.
Featherman, C., & Fuller, M. 2003. Applying TAM to e-services adoption: The moderating role of perceived risk. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE. 1-11.

26.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen. I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

27.
Gathoni, N., Gikandi, J., Ratanya, F., Njoroge, E. M., Wasike, E., Kiilu, D., & Kabugu, A. (2011). Monitoring and evaluation of electronic resources in academic and research institutions in Kenya: Summary report. INASP/KLISC.

28.
Hartmann, L., Kerssenfischer, F., Fritsch, T., & Nguyen, T. (2013) User acceptance of customer self-service portals. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 1(2), 111-121.

29.
Ifidon, S. E., & Ahiauzu, B. (2006). Information and communication as instruments of conflict resolution. Communicate: Journal of Library & Information Science, 8(1), 1-10.

30.
Iwehabura, M. F. (2009). Skills and training needs for use of electronic information resources (EIRS) among students in four Tanzanian Universities. Heartland J. Libr. Info. Sci., 2(1&2), 1-21.

31.
Janelle, R., & Fogarty, G. (2006). Determinants of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the technology acceptance model: Senior consumers' adoption of self-service banking technologies. Conference Proceedings. Academy of World Business Market and Management Development, 2(10). Retrieved from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/1649/1/10_Janelle_Rose_Service_Technology_Adopt.pdf.

32.
Kanyengo, K. W. (2006). Managing digital information resources in Africa: Preserving the integrant of scholarship. Paper presented at Bridging the NorthSouth divide in scholarly communication on Africa. Threats and opportunities in the digital era, Leiden, The Netherlands, 6-8 September. Retrieved from www.ascleiden.nl/pdf/elecpublconfkanyengo.pdf.

33.
Khayati, S., & Zouaoui, S. K. (2013). Perceived usefulness and use of information technology: The moderating influences of the dependence of a subcontractor towards his contractor. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 3(6), 68-77.

34.
Kulviwat, S., Brunner II, G. C., Kumar, A., Naso, S. A., & Clark, T. (2007). Toward a unified consumer acceptance technology. Psychology and Marketing, 24(12), 1059-84. crossref(new window)

35.
Kumar, G. T., & Kumar, B. T. (2008). Use of electronic information sources by the academic community: A comparative study. 6th International CALIBER-2008 (University of Allahabad, Allahabad, February 28-29 & March 1, 2008). Retrieved from http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/dxml/bitstream/handle/1944/1322/73.pdf?sequence=1.

36.
Kumar, S., & Singh, M. (2011). Access and use of electronic information resources by scientists on National Physical Laboratory in India: A case study. Singapore Journal of Library and Information Management, 40, 33-49.

37.
Lee, Y. H. (2007). Exploring key factors that affect consumers to adopt e-reading services. (Unpublished Master's thesis, Huafan University).

38.
Lee, Y.-H., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Hsu, C.-N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees’ intentions to use e-Learning systems. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124–37.

39.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40, 191-204. crossref(new window)

40.
Matusiak, K. K. (2011). User participation: Perceptions of usability and usefulness of digital libraries. Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 6(1-2), 133-47.

41.
Medlin, B. D. (2001). The factors that may influence a faculty member's decision to adopt electronic technologies in instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2001). ProQuest DigitalDissertations (UMI No. AAT 3095210).

42.
Miller, J., & Khera, O. (2010). Digital library adoption and the technology acceptance model: A cross-country analysis. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC) 40(6), 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/view/626/307.

43.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222. crossref(new window)

44.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1996) Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users. In K. Kautz & J. Pries-Heje (Eds.), Diffusion and adoption of information technology. London: Chapman & Hall.

45.
Negahban, M. B., & Talawar, V. G. (2009). Dependency on electronic resources among social science faculty in Iranian universities. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 28, 1-7. Retrieved from http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl28NT.pdf.

46.
Obasi, I. N. (2007). Analysis of the emergence and development of private universities in Nigeria (1999- 2006). Journal of Higher Education in Africa, 5(2&3), 39-66.

47.
Odero-Musakali, D., & Mutula, S. (2007). Internet adoption and assimilation in Kenyan university libraries. Library Review, 56(6), 464-75. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/0024-2535.htm. crossref(new window)

48.
Oduwole, A. A., & Sowole, A. O. (2006). Utilisation and impact of the essential electronic agricultural database (TEEAL) on library services in a Nigerian university of agriculture. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 40(2), 157-67. crossref(new window)

49.
Okiki, O. C., & Asiru, S. M. (2011). Use of electronic sources by postgraduate students in Nigeria: Influencing factors. Library Philosophy & Practice. Retrieved from www.digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/500.

50.
Okite-Amughoro, F. A., Makgahlela, L., & Bopape, S. (2014). The use of electronic information resources for academic research by postgraduate students at Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria. South African Journal of Libraries & Information Science, 80(2), 1-7.

51.
Omeluzor, S. U., Madukoma, E., Bamidele, I., & Ogbuiyi, S. U. (2012). Use of electronic information resources and research output by academic staff in private universities in Ogun State, Nigeria. Canadian Social Sciences, 8(3), 8-15.

52.
Omuta, G. E. D. (2010). The place of private participation in higher education: A periscope on private Universities in Nigeria. CPED Monograph Series No. 2. Benin City: Centre for Population and Environmental Development (CPED).

53.
Osubor, V. O., & Chiemeke, S. C. (2015). The impacts of information culture on e-learning innovation adoption in learning institutions in Nigeria. African Journal of Computing and ICT, 8(1), 17-26.

54.
Oye, N. D., Iahad, A. N., & Ab.Rahim, N. (2012). Acceptance and usage of ICT by university academicians using UTAUT Model: A case study of University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Science, 3(1), 81-89.

55.
Parisot, A. H. (1995). Technology and teaching: The adoption and diffusion of technological innovations by a community college faculty. (Doctoral dissertation, Montana State University). ProQuest Digital Dissertations (UMI No. AAT 9542260).

56.
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 150–62.

57.
Plouffe, C., Julland, J., & Vandenbosch, M. (2001) Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions - Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 208-22. crossref(new window)

58.
Ricardo, R., & Wade, D. (2001). Corporate performance management: How to build a better organization through measurement driven strategies alignment. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.

59.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovation. (1st ed.). Glencoe: Free Press.

60.
Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovation. New York: The Free Press.

61.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation. 5th EDOI ion. New York: Free Press.

62.
Rogers, M. (1998). The definition and measurement of productivity. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research Institute. University of Melbourne. Melbourne Working Paper No. 9/98.

63.
Salaam, M. O., & Aderibigbe, N. A. (2010). Awareness and utilization of the essential electronic agricultural library by academic staff: A case study of University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, 30. Retrieved from http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl30SA.pdf.

64.
Sentosa, I., & Mat, N. K. (2012). Examining a theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and technology acceptance model (TAM) in Internet purchasing using structural equation modeling. Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce 3(2), 62–77.

65.
Shamsul, M. (2009). Electronic information resources: Access and use. Digital information system. Online Information Review, 36(1), 21-39.

66.
Shih, C. H. (2007). Integrating Innovation Diffusion Theory and UTAUT to explore the influencing factors on teacher adoption of e-learning system - With MOODLE as an example. (Unpublished Master's thesis, Dayeh University).

67.
Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326–65. crossref(new window)

68.
Teo, T., & Schaik, P. V. (2009). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers: A structural equation modelling approach. The Asia Pacific Education Research, 18(1), 47-66.

69.
Tyagi, S. (2011). Use and awareness of electronic information sources at IIT Roorkee, India: A case study. JLIS. Int'l., 2(1), 233-41.

70.
Ugwu, C. I., & Onyegiri, D. C. (2013). Management problems of electronic information resources: A case study of UNN Library. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 5(5), 126-33. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1379697532_Ugwu%20and%20Onyegiri.pdf.

71.
Vasishta, S., & Navjyoti, (2004) Harnessing electronic information resources through prospective consortia approach: A national necessity. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/13464/1/Harnessing_Electronic_Information_Resources_through_Prospective_Consortia_Approach.pdf.

72.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. crossref(new window)

73.
Venkatesh, V. Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. B. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 23(3), 425-78.

74.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. Retrieved from http://vvenkatesh.com/Downloads/Papers/fulltext/pdf/Venkatesh_Bala_DS_2008.pdf. crossref(new window)

75.
Wang, H. Y., & Wang, S. H. (2010). User acceptance of mobile internet based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: Investigating the determinants and gender differences. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal, 38(3), 415-26. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.3.415. crossref(new window)

76.
Wu, M., Chuo, H., Weng, Y., & Huang, Y. (2011). TAM2-based study of website user behaviour—Using Web 2.0 websites as an example. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 4(8), 133-51.

77.
Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information Management, 42, 719–29. crossref(new window)

78.
Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Samah, B. A., Muhammad, M., Omar, M. Z., Bolong, J., Hassan, M. S., & Shaffril, H. A. M. (2015). A test of the technology acceptance model for understanding the ICT adoption behaviour of rural young entrepreneurs. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(2), 158-69.