Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Spot the difference: Solving the puzzle of hidden pictures in the lizard genome for identification of regeneration factors
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : BMB Reports
  • Volume 49, Issue 5,  2016, pp.249-254
  • Publisher : Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • DOI : 10.5483/BMBRep.2016.49.5.045
 Title & Authors
Spot the difference: Solving the puzzle of hidden pictures in the lizard genome for identification of regeneration factors
Chung, Jin Woong;
  PDF(new window)
All living things share some common life processes, such as growth and reproduction, and have the ability to respond to their environment. However, each type of organism has its own specialized way of managing biological events. Genetic sequences determine phenotypic and physiological traits. Based on genetic information, comparative genomics has been used to delineate the differences and similarities between various genomes, and significant progress has been made in understanding regenerative biology by comparing the genomes of a variety of lower animal models of regeneration, such as planaria, zebra fish, and newts. However, the genome of lizards has been relatively ignored until recently, even though lizards have been studied as an excellent amniote model of tissue regeneration. Very recently, whole genome sequences of lizards have been uncovered, and several attempts have been made to find regeneration factors based on genetic information. In this article, recent advances in comparative analysis of the lizard genome are introduced, and their biological implications and putative applications for regenerative medicine and stem cell biology are discussed.
Comparative genomics;Dedifferentiation;Lizard;Regeneration;Stem cells;
 Cited by
Franco C, Soares R, Pires E et al (2013) Understanding regeneration through proteomics. Proteomics 13, 686-709 crossref(new window)

Rink JC (2013) Stem cell systems and regeneration in planaria. Dev Genes Evol 223, 67-84 crossref(new window)

Baranowitz SA, Maderson PF, Connelly TG (1979) Lizard and newt tail regeneration: a quantitative study. J Exp Zool 210, 17-37 crossref(new window)

Simkin J, Han M, Yu L, Yan M, Muneoka K (2013) The mouse digit tip: from wound healing to regeneration. Methods Mol Biol 1037, 419-435 crossref(new window)

Laurin M, Reisz RR (1995) A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny. Zool J Linn Soc 113, 165-223 crossref(new window)

Foucart T, Lourdais O, DeNardo DF Heulin B (2014) Influence of reproductive mode on metabolic costs of reproduction: insight from the bimodal lizard Zootoca vivipara. J Exp Biol 217, 4049-4056 crossref(new window)

Kabelik D, Magruder DS (2014) Involvement of different mesotocin (oxytocin homologue) populations in sexual and aggressive behaviours of the brown anole. Biol Lett 10, pii: 20140566 crossref(new window)

Jeong AJ, Chung CN, Kim HJ et al (2012) Gecko Proteins Exert Anti-Tumor Effect against Cervical Cancer Cells Via PI3-Kinase/Akt Pathway. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 16, 361-365 crossref(new window)

Kim GY, Park SY, Jo A et al (2015) Gecko proteins induce the apoptosis of bladder cancer 5637 cells by inhibiting Akt and activating the intrinsic caspase cascade. BMB Rep 48, 531-536 crossref(new window)

Alföldi J, Di Palma F, Grabherr M et al (2011) The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477, 587-591 crossref(new window)

Axelsson E, Webster MT, Smith NG, Burt DW, Ellegren H (2005) Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes. Genome Res 15, 120-125 crossref(new window)

Groenen MA, Cheng HH, Bumstead N et al (2000) A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res 10, 137-147

Fillon V (1998) The chicken as a model to study microchromosomes in birds: a review. Genet Sel Evol 30, 209-219 crossref(new window)

Maan S, Maan NS, Samuel AR, Rao S, Attoui H, Mertens PP (2007) Analysis and phylogenetic comparisons of full-length VP2 genes of the 24 bluetongue virus serotypes. J Gen Virol 88, 621-630 crossref(new window)

Burt DW (2002) Origin and evolution of avian microchromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 96, 97-112 crossref(new window)

Gordon L, Yang S, Tran-Gyamfi M et al (2007) Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions. Genome Res 17, 1603-1613 crossref(new window)

Shetty S, Griffin DK, Graves JA (1999) Comparative painting reveals strong chromosome homology over 80 million years of bird evolution. Chromosome Res 7, 289-295 crossref(new window)

Fujita MK, Edwards SV, Ponting CP (2011) The Anolis lizard genome: an amniote genome without isochores. Genome Biol Evol 3, 974-984 crossref(new window)

Bernardi G (1993) The vertebrate genome: isochores and evolution. Mol Biol Evol 10, 186-204

Schimenti JC, Duncan CH (1984) Ruminant globin gene structures suggest an evolutionary role for Alu-type repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 12, 1641-1655 crossref(new window)

Liu Y, Zhou Q, Wang Y et al (2015) Gekko japonicus genome reveals evolution of adhesive toe pads and tail regeneration. Nat Commun 6, 10033 crossref(new window)

Rudnick DA, Perlmutter, DH, Muglia LJ (2001) Prostaglandins are required for CREB activation and cellular proliferation during liver regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 8885-8890 crossref(new window)

Hsueh YC, Wu JM, Yu CK, Wu KK, Hsieh PC (2014) Prostaglandin E(2) promotes post-infarction cardiomyocyte replenishment by endogenous stem cells. EMBO Mol Med 6, 496-503

Zhang Y, Desai A, Yang SY et al (2015) Tissue regeneration: Inhibition of the prostaglandin-degrading enzyme 15-PGDH potentiates tissue regeneration. Science 348, aaa2340 crossref(new window)

Hutchins ED, Markov GJ, Eckalbar WL et al (2014) Transcriptomic analysis of tail regeneration in the lizard Anolis carolinensis reveals activation of conserved vertebrate developmental and repair mechanisms. PLoS One 9, e105004 crossref(new window)

Geng R, Noda T, Mulvaney JF, Lin VY, Edge AS, Dabdoub A (2016) Comprehensive Expression of Wnt Signaling Pathway Genes during Development and Maturation of the Mouse Cochlea. PLoS One 11, e0148339 crossref(new window)

Hamilton PW, Sun Y, Henry JJ (2016) Lens regeneration from the cornea requires suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Exp Eye Res 145, 206-215 crossref(new window)

Houschyar KS, Momeni A, Pyles MN Maan ZN, Whittam AJ, Siemers F (2015) Wnt signaling induces epithelial differentiation during cutaneous wound healing. Organogenesis 11, 95-104 crossref(new window)

Pastuhov SI, Hisamoto N, Matsumoto K (2015) MAP kinase cascades regulating axon regeneration in C. elegans. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 91, 63-75 crossref(new window)

Ornitz DM, Marie PJ (2015) Fibroblast growth factor signaling in skeletal development and disease. Genes Dev 29, 1463-1486 crossref(new window)

Bae KS, Kim SY, Park SY et al (2014) Identification of lactoferrin as a human dedifferentiation factor through the studies of reptile tissue regeneration mechanisms. J Microbiol Biotechnol 24, 869-878 crossref(new window)

McLean KE, Vickaryous MK (2011) A novel amniote model of epimorphic regeneration: the leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius. BMC Dev Biol 11, 50 crossref(new window)

Brockes JP and Kumar A (2008) Comparative Aspects of Animal Regeneration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24, 525-549 crossref(new window)

Takayama Y, Aoki R (2012) Roles of lactoferrin on skin wound healing. Biochem Cell Biol 90, 497-503 crossref(new window)

Tang L, Wu JJ, Ma Q et al (2010) Human lactoferrin stimulates skin keratinocyte function and wound re-epithelialization. Br J Dermatol 163, 38-47

Tang L, Cui T, Wu JJ Liu-Mares W, Huang N, Li J (2010) A rice-derived recombinant human lactoferrin stimulates fibroblast proliferation, migration, and sustains cell survival. Wound Repair Regen 18, 123-131 crossref(new window)

Gan X, Liu D, Huang P, Gao W, Chen X, Hei Z (2012) Mast cell-releasing tryptase triggers acute lung injury induced by small intestinal ischemia-reperfusion by activating PAR-2 in rats. Inflammation 35, 1144-1153 crossref(new window)

Gourevitch D, Kossenkov AV, Zhang Y et al (2014) Inflammation and its correlates in regenerative wound healing: an alternate perspective. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 3, 592-603 crossref(new window)

McCarty SM, Percival SL (2013) Proteases and Delayed Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2, 438-447 crossref(new window)

Li W, Zhu S, Hu J (2015) Bone Regeneration Is Promoted by Orally Administered Bovine Lactoferrin in a Rabbit Tibial Distraction Osteogenesis Model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473, 2383-2393 crossref(new window)

Yoshimaki T, Sato S, Tsunori K et al (2013) Bone regeneration with systemic administration of lactoferrin in non-critical-sized rat calvarial bone defects. J Oral Sci 55, 343-348 crossref(new window)

Pattamatta U, Willcox M, Stapleton F, Garrett Q (2013) Bovine lactoferrin promotes corneal wound healing and suppresses IL-1 expression in alkali wounded mouse cornea. Curr Eye Res 38, 1110-1117 crossref(new window)

Takayama Y, Aoki R (2012) Roles of lactoferrin on skin wound healing. Biochem Cell Biol 90, 497-503 crossref(new window)

Makanae A, Mitogawa K, Satoh A (2016) Cooperative inputs of Bmp and Fgf signaling induce tail regeneration in urodele amphibians. Dev Biol 410, 45-55 crossref(new window)

Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-876 crossref(new window)

Takahashi K, Okita K, Nakagawa M, Yamanaka S (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from fibroblast cultures. Nat Protoc 2, 3081-3089 crossref(new window)

Bayart E, Cohen-Haguenauer O (2013) Technological overview of iPS induction from human adult somatic cells. Curr Gene Ther 13, 73-92 crossref(new window)

Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K et al (2007) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917-1920 crossref(new window)

Nakagawa M, Kyanagi M, Tanabe K et al (2008) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 26, 101-106 crossref(new window)

Wernig M, Meissner A, Cassady JP, Jaenisch R (2008) c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2, 10-12 crossref(new window)