Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Estimation in Group Testing when a Dilution Effect exists
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Estimation in Group Testing when a Dilution Effect exists
Kwon, Se-Hyug;
  PDF(new window)
In group testing, the test unit consists of a group of individuals and each group is tested to classify units from a population as infected or non-infected or estimate the infection rate. If the test group is infected, one or more individuals in the group are presumed to be infected. It is assumed in group testing that classification of group as positive or negative is without error. But, the possibility of false negatives as a result of dilution effects happens often in practice, specially in many clinical researches. In this paper, dilution effect models in group testing are discussed and estimation methods of infection rate are proposed when a dilution effect exists.
Group testing;dilution effect model;estimation;
 Cited by
Chen, C.L. and Swallow, W.H (1995). Sensitivity Analysis of variable-size group testing and its related models. Biometrical Journal, Vol. 37, 173 -181 crossref(new window)

Cahoon-Young, B., Chandler, A., Livermore, T., Caudino, J., and Benjamin, R. (1989). Sensitivity and specificity of pooled versus individual sera In a HIV-antibody prevalence study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 27, 1893-1895

Dorfman, R (1943). The detection of defective members of large population. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 14, 436-440 crossref(new window)

Gastwirth, J.L. and Harnmick, P.A. (1989). Estimation of the prevalence of a rare disease, preserving the anonymity of the subjects by group testing: application to estimating the prevalence of AIDS antibodies in blood donors. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 22, 15-27 crossref(new window)

Emmanuel, J.C. and Bassett, M.T. (1988). Pooling of sera for HIV testing: An economical method for use in developing countries. Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 41, 582-585 crossref(new window)

Hung, M. and Sallow, W.H. (1999). Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions. Biometrics, Vol. 55, 231-237 crossref(new window)

Kline, R.L., Brithers, T.A, Brookmeyer, R., Zegar, S., and Quinn, T.C. (1989). Evaluation of HIV seroprevalence in population surveys using pooled sera. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 27, 1449-1452

Litvak, E., Tu, X.M., and Pagano, M. (1994). Screening for the presence of a disease by pooling sera samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 89, 424--434 crossref(new window)

Monzon, O.T, Paladin, F.J.E., Dimaandal, E., Balis, A.M., Samson, C., and Mitxhell, S. (1992). Relevance of antibody content and test format in HIV testing of pooled sera. AIDS, Vol. 6, 43-48 crossref(new window)

Swallow, W.H. (1985). Group testing for estimation infection rates and probabilities of diseases transmission. Phytopathology, Vol. 75, 1376 -1381

Thompson, K.H. (1962). Estimation of the proportion of vectors in a natural population of insects. Biometrics, Vol. 18, 568-578 crossref(new window)

Tu, X.M., Litvak, E., and Pagano, M. (1995). On the informativeness and accuracy of pooled testing in estimating prevalence of a rare disease: Application to HIV screening. Biometrika, Vol. 82, 287-297 crossref(new window)