JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Use of Beta-Polynomial Approximations for Variance Homogeneity Test and a Mixture of Beta Variates
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Use of Beta-Polynomial Approximations for Variance Homogeneity Test and a Mixture of Beta Variates
Ha, Hyung-Tae; Kim, Chung-Ah;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Approximations for the null distribution of a test statistic arising in multivariate analysis to test homogeneity of variances and a mixture of two beta distributions by making use of a product of beta baseline density function and a polynomial adjustment, so called beta-polynomial density approximant, are discussed. Explicit representations of density and distribution approximants of interest in each case can easily be obtained. Beta-polynomial density approximants produce good approximation over the entire range of the test statistic and also accommodate even the bimodal distribution using an artificial example of a mixture of two beta distributions.
 Keywords
Test statistic;p-values;density approximation;variance equality;moments;mixture of distributions;bimodality;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M. and Brunk, H. D. (1972). Statistical Inference under Order Restrictions, John Wiley & Sons, London

2.
Bhattacharya, C. G. (1967). A simple method of resolution of a distribution into Gaussian compo-nents, Biometrics, 23, 115-135 crossref(new window)

3.
Butler, R. W. and Wood, A. T. A. (2002). Laplace approximations for hypergeometric functions with matrix argument, The Annals of Statistics, 30, 1155-1177 crossref(new window)

4.
Butler, R. W. and Wood, A. T. A. (2004). Mixture representations of noncentral distributions in multivariate analysis with application to a dimensional CLT, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 31, 631-650 crossref(new window)

5.
Gupta, A. K. and Rathie, A. K. (1982). Distribution of the likelihood ratio criterion for the problem of K samples, Metron, 40, 147-156

6.
Ha, H. T. and Provost, S. B. (2007). A viable alternative to resorting to statistical tables, Communica-tion in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 36, 1135-1151 crossref(new window)

7.
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous Univariate Distributions, John Wiley & Sons, New York

8.
Kolassa, J. E. (2003). Multivariate saddlepoint tail probability approximations, The Annals of Statistics, 31, 274-286 crossref(new window)

9.
Neyman, J. and Pearson, E. S. (1931). On the problem of k-samples, Bulletin of Academic Polonaise Science Letters, 3, 460-481

10.
Provost, S. B. and Rudiuk, E. M. (1995). Moments and densities of test statistics for covariance structures, International Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, 4, 85-104

11.
Reid, N. (1988). Saddlepoint methods and statistical inference, Statistical Science, 3, 213-227 crossref(new window)

12.
Tretter, M. J. and Walster, G. W. (1975). Central and noncentral distributions of Wilks’ statistic in Manova as mixtures of incomplete Beta functions, The Annals of Statistics, 3, 467-472 crossref(new window)