JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparing the Use of Self and Peer Assessment: A Case Study in a Statistics Course
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparing the Use of Self and Peer Assessment: A Case Study in a Statistics Course
Han, Kyung-Soo; Mun, Gil-Seong; Ahn, Jeong-Yong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this study, we compare the assessments made by self, peer and instructor in a statistics course. The goal is to investigate the following two questions: (1) Is it reasonable or fair to expect students to be responsible for assessing the work of their colleagues and themselves? (2) What are students` opinions about the learning effect after they participate in the assessment process? As part of the study investigating these questions, we designed a prototype for a Web-based assessment tool and a procedure to apply the assessment techniques in a statistics course. In addition, we collected and analyzed the data produced in the assessment processes from students and the instructor. The analysis results are summarized as follows: First, self assessment was not accord with instructor assessment, but peer assessment was similar to the assessment by instructor. This result reflected that it is reasonable or fair to expect students to be responsible for assessing the work of their colleagues. Second, peer assessment of their colleagues successfully helped students increase their understanding of the course, and the students increased their skills in the actual assessment process by assessing the work of their colleagues. Finally, many students indicated a high interest level on the assessments.
 Keywords
Self and peer assessment;learning effectiveness;assessment data analysis;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
A'ali, M. (2007). Adoption of peer-to-peer assessment in a computing skills course, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 4, 828–833

2.
Ahn, J. Y., Han, K. S. and Han, B. S. (2005). Web-based education: Characteristics, problems, and some solutions, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 2, 274–282

3.
Ahn, J. Y., Mun, G. S. and Han, K. S. (2009). Comparing self and peer assessment with instructor assessment in a statistics course, Proceedings of the IMS-APRM & 2009 Conference of the Korean Statistical Society, 183

4.
Barbosa, H. and Garcia, F. (2005). Importance of online assessment in the e-learning process, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, F3B/1-F3B/6

5.
Barchino, R., Gutierrez, J. M., Oton, S., Martinez, J. J., Hilera, J. R. and Gutierrez de Mesa, J. A. (2006). E-learning model for assessment, Proceedings of the Virtual Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems

6.
Bouchillon, W. H., Meyer, T. and White, J. (1999). 21st century assessment (One in a series of products for Preparing All Learners PAL for the Workforce), The University of West Florida

7.
Cahyadi, V. (2004). The effect of interactive engagement teaching on student understanding of introductory physics at the faculty of engineering, University of Surabaya, Indonesia. Higher Education Research & Development, 23, 455–464 crossref(new window)

8.
Cooper, T. and Love, T. (2002). Online portfolios: Issues of assessment and pedagogy, In Jeffrey, P.(Ed.), AARE 2001: Crossing Borders: New Frontiers of Educational Research

9.
Doignon, J. P. and Falmagne, J. C. (1999). Knowledge Spaces, Springer, Germany

10.
Dureva, D. and Tuparov, G. (2006). Assessment models in e-learning environments, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, IV.7-1 - IV.7-5

11.
Ellington, H., Earl, S. and Cowan, J. (1997). Making effective use of peer and self assessment, Technical Paper, The Robert Gordon University, England

12.
Gentile, E. and Plantamura, P. (2003). Assessment and self-assessment in e-learning courseware, Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 1587–1590

13.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74

14.
Jain, L. C., Tedman, R. A. and Tedman, D. K. (2007). Evolution of Teaching and Learning Paradigms in Intelligent Environment, Springer, Germany

15.
Joordens, S., Desa, S. and Pare, D. (2009). The pedagogical anatomy of peer-assessment: Dissecting a peer Scholar assignment, The Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 7, 1–6

16.
Lai, K. R. and Lan, C. H. (2006). Modelling peer assessment as agent negotiation in a computer supported collaborative learning environment, Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9, 16–26

17.
Love, T. and Cooper, T. (2004). Designing online information systems for portfolio-based assessment:Design criteria and heuristics, Journal of Information Technology Education, 3, 65–81

18.
Miao, Y. and Koper, R. (2007). An effcient and flexible technical approach to develop and deliver online peer assessment, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 502–511

19.
Miao, Y., Tattersall, C., Schoonenboom, J., Stevanov, K. and Petrova, A. A. (2007). Using open technical e-learning standards and service-orientation to support new forms of e-assessment, Proceedings of the TENCompetence

20.
Orpen, C. (1982). Student versus lecturer assessment of learning: A research note, Higher Education, 11, 567–572 crossref(new window)

21.
Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R. and Meyer, C. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio?, Educational Leadership, 48, 60–63

22.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture, Educational Researcher, 29, 4–14 crossref(new window)

23.
Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merrienboer, J. and Martens, R. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: effects on performance and perceptions, Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 41, 60–79 crossref(new window)

24.
Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276

25.
Watering, G., Gijbels, D., Dochy, F. and Rijt, J. (2008). Students' assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results, Higher Education, 56, 645–658 crossref(new window)

26.
Wen, M. L. and Tsai, C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and sttitudes toward (online) peer assessment, Higher Education, 51, 27–44 crossref(new window)

27.
Wheater, P., Langan, A. M. and Dunleavy, P. (2005). Students assessing student: Case studies on peer assessment, Planet, 15, 13–15