JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Comparison Study for the Pricing of Automobile Insurance Premium Based on Credibility
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Comparison Study for the Pricing of Automobile Insurance Premium Based on Credibility
Kim, Yeong-Hwa; Lee, Hyun-Soo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Calculating or estimating the proper insurance premium is very important decision making process for both the policyholder and the insurance company. The credibility theory is one of the most important theories in actuarial science to get the proper premium. In this research, we introduce the rule of relative exposure volume, the square root rule and the Bhlmann credibility, and estimate the new premiums based on these methods. By real data analysis, the accuracy of these credibility methods are compared.
 Keywords
Bhlmann credibility;credibility;relative exposure volume;square root rule;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
여러가지 신뢰도에 근거한 자동차 보험료 예측,김영화;김미정;김명준;

응용통계연구, 2011. vol.24. 2, pp.279-292 crossref(new window)
2.
적정 손해보험료 산정을 위한 부분신뢰도 제안,김명준;최정아;김영화;

응용통계연구, 2013. vol.26. 2, pp.321-333 crossref(new window)
1.
A study of Bayesian inference on auto insurance credibility application, Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society, 2013, 24, 4, 689  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Suggestions of Partial Credibilities for Proper Non-Life Insurance Premium, Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 2013, 26, 2, 321  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
김영화, 김기수(2009). 고객집단별보험금에대한소지역추정, <데이터정보과학회지>, 20, 77–88.

2.
Bailey, A. (1950). A generalized theory of credibility, Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, XXXII, 13, 1–20.

3.
Buhlmann, H. (1967). Experience rating and credibility I, ASTIN Bulletin, 4, 199–207.

4.
Buhlmann, H. (1969). Experience rating and credibility II, ASTIN Bulletin, 5, 157–165.

5.
Buhlmann, H. and Straub, E. (1970). Glabwurdigkeit fur schandensatze, Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Actuaries Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 70, 111–133.

6.
Frees, E.W. (2003). Multivariate credibility for aggregate loss models, North American Actuarial Journal, 7, 13–37.

7.
Hachemeister, C. A. (1975). Credibility for regression models with application to trend, Credibility, Theory and Application, Academic Press, New York, 129–163.

8.
Longley-Cook, L. H. (1960). An Introduction to Credibility Theory, XLIX PCAS, 194.

9.
Mowbray, A. H. (1914). How extensive a payroll exposure is necessary to give a dependable pure premium, Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, 1, 24–30.

10.
Perryman, F. S. (1932). Some Notes on Credibility, XIX PCAS, 65.

11.
Whitney, A. W. (1918). The theory of experience rating, Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, 4, 274–292.