JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Influence Analysis of the Common Mean Problem
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Influence Analysis of the Common Mean Problem
Kim, Myung Geun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Two influence diagnostic methods for the common mean model are proposed. First, an investigation of the influence of observations according to minor perturbations of the common mean model is made by adapting the local influence method which is based on the likelihood displacement. It is well known that the maximum likelihood estimates are in general sensitive to influential observations. Case-deletions can be a candidate for detecting influential observations. However, the maximum likelihood estimators are iteratively computed and therefore case-deletions involve an enormous amount of computations. An approximation by Newton's method to the maximum likelihood estimator obtained after a single observation was deleted can reduce much of computational burden, which will be treated in this work. A numerical example is given for illustration and it shows that the proposed diagnostic methods can be useful tools.
 Keywords
Case deletions;common mean;local influence;Newton method;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Chang, C. H. and Pal, N. (2008). Testing on the common mean of several normal distributions, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 53, 321-333. crossref(new window)

2.
Cook, R. D. (1986). Assessment of local influence (with discussions), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 48, 133-169.

3.
Cook, R. D. and Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and Influence in Regression, Chapman and Hall, New York.

4.
Graybill, F. A. and Deal, R. B. (1959). Combining unbiased estimators, Biometrics, 15, 543-550. crossref(new window)

5.
Kelleher, T. (1996). A Bayes method for estimating the common mean of two normal populations, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 25, 2141-2157. crossref(new window)

6.
Kennedy, W. and Gentle, J. (1980). Statistical Computing, Dekker, New York.

7.
Kubokawa, T. (1991). Estimation of the common mean and its applications, Sugaku Expositions, 4, 97-110 (Published by American Mathematical Society).

8.
Lee, S. Y. and Lu, B. (2003). Case-Deletion diagnostics for nonlinear structural equation models, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 375-400. crossref(new window)

9.
Ma, T., Ye, R. and Jia, L. (2011). Finite-sample properties of the Graybill-Deal estimator, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141, 3675-3680. crossref(new window)

10.
Montgomery, D. C. (1997). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.

11.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kutner, M. (1990). Applied Linear Statistical Models, 3rd ed., Irwin.

12.
O'Neill, Barrett (2006). Elementary Differential Geometry, 2nd ed., Academic Press.

13.
Pal, N., Lin, J.-J., Chang, C.-H. and Kumar, S. (2007). A revisit to the common mean problem: Comparing the maximum likelihood estimator with the Graybill-deal estimator, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 5673-5681. crossref(new window)

14.
Zacks, S. (1966). Unbiased estimation of the common mean of two normal distributions based on small samples of equal size, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 467-476. crossref(new window)

15.
Zacks, S. (1970). Bayes and fiducial equivariant estimators of the common mean of two normal distributions, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 59-69. crossref(new window)