JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Law and Statistics: Education, Applications and Research
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Law and Statistics: Education, Applications and Research
Huh, Myung-Hoe;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
As an effort to reform legal system of Korea, the law school system is introduced in March 2009. Thus the law culture of Korea is expected to change drastically for diversification, specialization and globalization. With such social trend as background, the author writes on the pre-law and law school courses "Law and Statistics" which were offered at Korea University. Also, he reviews two legal cases and summarizes two research results: DNA database controversies and a sentence standardization model.
 Keywords
Law school;statistical evidence;DNA database;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
김두섭, 기광도 (1996). <교통범죄양형에 관한 실태분석>, 한국형사정책연구원 연구보고서.

2.
노성호, 김성언, 이동원, 김지선 (1999). <성폭력범죄의 양형실태에 관한 연구>, 한국형사정책연구원 연구보고서.

3.
이상용(2002). <유전자 정보의 보호와 이용통제에 관한 연구>, 형사정책연구원 연구총서.

4.
이승환 (2001). DNA 프로필 데이터베이스, <유전자 감식> (DNA 프로필 연구회 편), 11장, 아이디진, 서울.

5.
이재원, 황적준 (2001). 유전자 감식 - 형사소송에서의 개인식별검사, <유전자 감식> (DNA 프로필 연구회 편), 9장, 아이디진, 서울.

6.
정연보 (2001). DNA와 유전. <유전자 감식> (DNA 프로필 연구회 편), 1장. 아이디진, 서울.

7.
정연보 (2008). , 김영사, 서울.

8.
허명회 (1999). <사회과학을 위한 통계적 방법>. 자유아카데미, 서울.

9.
황만성, 이숭덕 (2006). <형사절차상 유전자정보의 관리 및 활용 방안>, 형사정책연구원 연구총서.

10.
Aitken, C. and Taroi, F. (2004). Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, Second Edition. Wiley, England.

11.
Balding, D. J. and Donnelly, P. (1995). Inference in forensic identification, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 158, 21–53. crossref(new window)

12.
Devlin, B. (2000). The evidentiary value of a DNA database search, Biometrics, 56, 1276. crossref(new window)

13.
Evett, I. W., Foreman, L. A. and Weir, B. S. (2000). Letter to the editor of Biometrics, Biometrics, 56, 1274–1275.

14.
Evett, I. W. and Weir, B. S. (1998). Interpreting DNA Evidence, Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinaur.

15.
Finkelstein, M. O. and Levin, B. (2001). Statistics for Lawyers (Second Edition), Springer, New York.

16.
Gastwirth, J. L., Freidlin, B. and Miao, W. (2000). The Shonubi case as an example of the legal system’s failure to appreciate statistical evidence, In Statistical Science in the Courtroom (Edited by J. Gastwirth), Springer-Verlag, New York, 405–413.

17.
Good, P. (2001). Applying Statistics in the Courtroom: A New Approach for Attorneys and Expert Witnesses, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.

18.
Izenman, A. J. (2000). Introduction to Two Views on the Shonubi Case, In Statistical Science in the Courtroom (Edited by J. Gastwirth), Springer-Verlag, New York, 393–403.

19.
Lucy, D. (2005). Introduction to Statistics for Forensic Scientists, Wiley, Chester.

20.
NRC, National Research Council (1996). The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence, National Academic Press, Washington DC.

21.
Stockmarr, A. (1999). Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence when the suspect is found through a database search, Biometrics, 55, 671–677. crossref(new window)

22.
Zeger, S. L., Wyant, T., Miller, L. S. and Samet, J. (2000). Statistical testimony on damages in Minnesota v. Tobacco Company, In Statistical Science in the Courtroom (Edited by J. Gastwirth), Springer-Verlag, New York.

23.
Zeisel, H. and Kaye, D. (1997). Prove It with Figures: Empirical Methods in Law and Litigation, Springer, New York.