JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Analysis of Tumorigenicity Data with Informative Censoring
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Analysis of Tumorigenicity Data with Informative Censoring
Kim, Jin-Heum; Kim, Youn-Nam;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In animal tumorigenicity data, the occurrence time of tumor is not observed because the existence of a tumor is examined only at either time of natural death or time of sacrifice for the animal. A three-state model (Health-Tumor onset-Death) is widely used to model the incomplete data. In this paper, we employed a frailty effect into the three-state model to incorporate the dependency of death on tumor occurrence when the time of natural death works as an informative censoring against the tumor onset time. For the inference of parameters, then the EM algorithm is considered in order to deal with missing quantities of tumor onset time and random frailty. The proposed method is applied to the bladder tumor data taken from Lindsey and Ryan (1993, 1994) and a simulation study is performed to show the behavior of the proposed estimators.
 Keywords
Bladder cancer data;EM algorithm;gamma frailty effect;Gauss-Laguerre method;three-state model;tumorigenicity experiment;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood for incomplete data via the EM algorithms (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-38.

2.
French, J. L. and Ibrahim, J. G. (2002). Bayesian methods for a three-state model for rodent carcinogenicity studies, Biometrics, 58, 906-916. crossref(new window)

3.
Golub, G. H. and Welsch, J. H. (1969). Calculation of Gauss quadrature rules, Mathematics of Computation, 23, 221-230. crossref(new window)

4.
Hastings, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57, 97-109. crossref(new window)

5.
Huang, X. and Wolfe, R. A. (2002). A frailty model for informative censoring, Biometrics, 58, 510-520. crossref(new window)

6.
Kim, J., Kim, Y., Nam, C., Choi, E. and Kim, Y. J. (2010). A analysis of tumorigenicity data using a normal frailty effect, Proceedings for the Spring Conference, 2010, The Korean Statistical Society, 13.

7.
Lagakos, S. W. and Louis, T. A. (1988). Use of tumor lethality to interpret tumorigenicity experiments lacking cause-of-death data, Applied Statistics, 37, 169-179. crossref(new window)

8.
Lindsey, J. C. and Ryan, L. M. (1993). A three-state multiplicative model for rodent tumorigenicity experiments, Applied Statistics, 42, 283-300. crossref(new window)

9.
Lindsey, J. C. and Ryan, L. M. (1994). A comparison of continuous - and discrete time three state models for rodent tumorigenicity experiments, Environmental Health Perspective Supplements, 102, 9-17.

10.
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H. and Teller, E. (1953). Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines, Journal of Chemical Physics, 21, 1087-1091. crossref(new window)

11.
Sun, J. (2006). The Statistical Analysis of Interval-Censored Failure Time Data, Springer, New York.