JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Composite Trend Test with Symptom Occurrence and Severity Symptom Scores
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Composite Trend Test with Symptom Occurrence and Severity Symptom Scores
Choi, Se-Mi; Yang, Soo; Song, Hae-Hiang;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
During clinical trials a researcher is frequently able to observe a disease symptom in a subject as well as a severity score for those who experienced a symptom after a fixed length of treatment. The traditional method to evaluate a decreasing trend in proportion, when there is an intrinsic order in the treatment groups (for example control and two or more treatment groups) is a Cochran-Armitage test, while the method to evaluate a decreasing trend in continuous non-normal data is a Jonckheere-Tersptra test. The Cochran-Armitage test emphasizes the dichotomous data of symptom occurrence and the Jonckheere-Tersptra test emphasizes the continuous non-normal data of severity symptom scores. In this paper we propose new test statistics that consider the combined evidence from a symptom occurrence and disease severity score. We illustrate these methods with example data of schizophrenic inpatients that demonstrated antipsychotic-drug induced constipation. A small-scale simulation is conducted to compare the new trend tests with other trend tests.
 Keywords
Trend test;symptom incidence;symptom severity;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, New York.

2.
Armitage, P. (1955). Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies, Biometrics, 11, 375-386. crossref(new window)

3.
Burkitt, D. P., Walker, A. R. P. and Painter, N. S. (1972). Effect of dietary fibre on stools and transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease, The Lancet, 2, 1408-1411.

4.
Chang, M. N., Guess, H. A. and Heyse, J. F. (1994). Reduction in burden of illness: A new efficacy measure for prevention trials, Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1807-1814. crossref(new window)

5.
Cochran, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common chi-squared test, Biometrics, 10, 417-451. crossref(new window)

6.
Cummings, J. H. (1984). Constipation, dietary fibre and control of large bowel function, Postgraduate Medical Journal, 60, 811-819. crossref(new window)

7.
DiPalma, J. A., Cleveland, M. V., McGowan, J. and Herrera, J. L. (2007). A randomized, multicenter, placebocontrolled trial of polyethylene glycol laxative for chronic treatment of chronic constipation, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 102, 1436-1441. crossref(new window)

8.
Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. A. (1999). Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, New York.

9.
Jonckheere, A. R. (1954). A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives, Biometrika, 41, 133-145. crossref(new window)

10.
Terpstra, T. J. (1952). The asymptotic normality and consistency of kendall's test against trend when ties are present in one ranking, Indagationes Mathematicae, 14, 327-333.

11.
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods, Biometrics, 1, 80-83. crossref(new window)

12.
Yang, S. (1992). Effects of fluid intake, dietary fiber supplement and abdominal muscle exercises on antipsychotic drug-induced constipation in schizophrenics, Journal of Catholic Medical College, 45, 1501-1514.