Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis on the Effect of Job Training for Non-Regular Employees Lee, Sang-Jun;
This paper studies the effect of job training for non-regular employees in the Korea labor market. Using an economically active population data set of statistics Korea, we apply a non-parametric matching and sensitivity analysis method to measure the effect of the training for non-regular employees and to look for the impact of an unobservable variable or confounding factor in regards to the selection effect and outcome effect. In the our empirical results, we conclude that the effect of the training for non-regular employees has a better employment effect for getting a regular job rather than a wage effect; in addition, the impact of unobservable variables or confounding factors do not exercise a statistically strong influence on the baseline ATT.
Matching;non-regular or temporary job;training effect;sensitivity analysis;confoundedness;
채창균 (2009). 비정규직의 직업훈련 참여 실태와 성과, <비정규직 문제 종합연구>, 한국개발연구원, 221-250.
Budriaa, S. and Pereira, P. T. (2004). On the Returns to Training in Portugal, IZA, Discussion Paper No.1429.
Francis, G. (2000). The impact Of company human resources polices on social skills: Implications for training sponsorship, quit rates and efficiency wages, Scottish Journal Of Political Economy, 47, 251-272.
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme, The Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605-654.
Holzer, H. J., Block, R, N., Cheathan, M. and Knott, J. H. (1993). Are training subsidies for firms effective? The Michigan experience, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46, 625-636.
Ichino, A., Mealli, F. and Nannicini, T. (2008). From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: What can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity?, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 305-327.
Krueger, A. and Rouse, C. (1998). The effect of workplace education on earnings, turnover, and job performance, Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 61-94.
Lechner, M. (2002). Program heterogeneity and propensity score matching: An application to the evaluation of active labor market policies, Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 205-220.
Pischke, J.-S. (2001). Continuous training in Germany, Journal of Population Economics, 14, 523-548.
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1983a). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1983b). Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 45, 212-218.
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score, American Statistician, 3, 33-38.
Smith, J. and Todd, P. (2005). Does matching overcome Lalonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?, Journal of Econometrics, 125, 305-353.