JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Pattern-Mixture Model of the Cox Proportional Hazards Model with Missing Binary Covariates
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Pattern-Mixture Model of the Cox Proportional Hazards Model with Missing Binary Covariates
Youk, Tae-Mi; Song, Ju-Won;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
When fitting a Cox proportional hazards model with missing covariates, it is inefficient to exclude observations with missing values in the analysis. Furthermore, if the missing-data mechanism is not Missing Completely At Random(MCAR), it may lead to biased parameter estimation. Many approaches have been suggested to handle the Cox proportional hazards model when covariates are sometimes missing, but they are based on the selection model. This paper suggest an approach to handle Cox proportional hazards model with missing covariates by using the pattern-mixture model (Little, 1993). The pattern-mixture model is expressed by the joint distribution of survival time and the missing-data mechanism. In the pattern-mixture model, many models can be considered by setting up various restrictions, and different results under various restrictions indicate the sensitivity of the model due to missing covariates. A simulation study was conducted to show the sensitivity of parameter estimation under different restrictions in a pattern-mixture model. The proposed approach was also applied to mouse leukemia data.
 Keywords
Cox proportional hazards model;missing covariates;pattern-mixture model;sensitivity analysis;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Chen, H. Y. and Little, R. J. A. (1999). Proportional hazards regression with missing covariates, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 896-908. crossref(new window)

2.
Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187-220.

3.
Cox, D. R. (1975). Partial likelihood, Biometrika, 62, 269-279. crossref(new window)

4.
Demirtas, H. (2005). Multiple imputation under Bayesianly smoothed pattern-mixture models for nonignorable drop-out, Statistics in Medicine, 24, 2345-2363. crossref(new window)

5.
Herring, A. H. and Ibrahim, J. G. (2001). Likelihood-based methods for missing covariates in the Cox proportional hazards model, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 292-302. crossref(new window)

6.
Herring, A. H., Ibrahim, J. G. and Lipsitz, S. R. (2004). Non- ignorable missing covariate data in survival analysis: A case-study of an International Breast Cancer Study Group trial, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 53, 293-310. crossref(new window)

7.
Hogan, J. W. and Laird, N. M. (1997). Model-based approaches to analysing incomplete longitudinal and failure time data, Statistics in Medicine, 16, 259-272. crossref(new window)

8.
Kalb eisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L. (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Wiley, New York.

9.
Lin, D. Y. and Ying, Z. (1993). Cox regression with incomplete covariate measurements, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1341-1349. crossref(new window)

10.
Little, R. J. A. (1993). Pattern-Mixture models for multivariate incomplete data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 125-134. crossref(new window)

11.
Little, R. J. A. and Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical Analysis With Missing Data, Wiley, New York.

12.
Molenberghs, G., Michiels, B., Kenward, M. G. and Diggle, P. J. (1998). Monotone missing data and patternmixture models, Statistica Neerlandica, 52, 153-161. crossref(new window)

13.
Thijs, H., Molenberghs, G., Michiels, B., Verbeke, G. and Curran, D. (2002). Strategies to fit pattern-mixture models, Biostatistics, 3, 245-265. crossref(new window)

14.
Wang, C. and Daniels, M. J. (2011). A note on MAR, identifying restrictions, model comparison, and sensitivity analysis in Pattern-Mixture models with and without covariates for incomplete data, Biometrics, 67, 810-818. crossref(new window)