JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Comparison Study of Multivariate Binary and Continuous Outcomes
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Comparison Study of Multivariate Binary and Continuous Outcomes
Pak, Dae-Woo; Cho, Hyung-Jun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Multivariate data are often generated with multiple outcomes in various fields. Multiple outcomes could be mixed as continuous and discrete. Because of their complexity, the data are often dealt with by separately applying regression analysis to each outcome even though they are associated the each other. This univariate approach results in the low efficiency of estimates for parameters. We study the efficiency gains of the multivariate approaches relative to the univariate approach with the mixed data that include continuous and binary outcomes. All approaches yield consistent estimates for parameters with complete data. By jointly estimating parameters using multivariate methods, it is generally possible to obtain more accurate estimates for parameters than by a univariate approach. The association between continuous and binary outcomes creates a gap in efficiency between multivariate and univariate approaches. We provide a guidance to analyze the mixed data.
 Keywords
Multivariate methods;mixed outcomes;factorization estimation;GEE;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Bishop, Y. M. D., Fienberg, S. E. and Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis, Theory and Practice, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London.

2.
Cox, D. R. (1972). The analysis of multivariate binary data, Applied Statistics, 21, 113-120. crossref(new window)

3.
Fitzmaurice, G. M. and Laird, N. M. (1995). Regression models for a bivariate discrete and continuous outcome with clustering, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 845-852. crossref(new window)

4.
Fitzmaurice, G. M. and Laird, N. M. (1997). Regression models for mixed discrete and continuous responses with potentially missing values, Biometrics, 53, 110-122. crossref(new window)

5.
Liang, K. and Zeger, S. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models, Biometrika, 73, 13-22. crossref(new window)

6.
Olkin, I. and Tate, R. F. (1961). Multivariate correlation models with mixed discrete and continuous variables, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 448-465. crossref(new window)

7.
Pinto, A. T. and Normand, S. L. T. (2009). Correlated bivariate continuous and binary outcomes: Issues and applications, Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1753-1773. crossref(new window)

8.
Prentice, R. L. and Zhao, L. P. (1991). Estimating equations for parameters in means and covariances of multivariate discrete and continuous responses, Biometrics, 47, 825-839. crossref(new window)

9.
Zhao, L. P., Prentice, R. L. and Self, S. G. (1992). Multivariate mean parameter estimation by using a partly exponential model, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 805-811.