JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Testing and Adjustment for Inhomogeneity Temperature Series Using the SNHT Method
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Testing and Adjustment for Inhomogeneity Temperature Series Using the SNHT Method
Lee, Yung-Seop; Kim, Hee-Kyung; Lee, Jung-In; Lee, Jae-Won; Kim, Hee-Soo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Data quality and climate forecasting performance deteriorates because of long climate data contaminated by non-climatic factors such as the station relocation or new instrument replacement. For a trusted climate forecast, it is necessary to implement data quality control and test inhomogeneous data. Before the inhomogeneity test, a reference series was created by index to measure the temperature series relationship between the candidate and surrounding stations. In this study, a inhomogeneity test to each season and climatological station was performed on the daily mean temperatures, daily minimum temperatures and daily maximum temperatures. After comparing two inhomogeneity tests, the traditional and the adjusted SNHT method, we found the adjusted SNHT method was slightly superior to the traditional one.
 Keywords
Inhomogeneity test;d index;data quality control;SNHT method;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Alexandersson, H. and Moberg, A. (1997). Homogenization of Swedish temperature data. part I : Homo- geneity test for linear trends, Journal of Climatology, 17, 25-34. crossref(new window)

2.
Durre, I., Menne, M. J., Gleason, B. E., Houston, T. G. and Vose, R. S. (2010). Comprehensive automated quality assurance of daily surface observations, National Climatic Data Center, 49, 1615-1633.

3.
Kim, B.-J., Kim, J.-H., Cho, C.-H., and Sohn, K.-T. (2004). A Study on Homogeneity Test of Meteorological Observation Data and Filling of Missing Data, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6, 293- 302.

4.
Kim, C. and Suh, M.-S. (2008). Change-Point in the Recent (1976-2005) Precipitation over South Korea, Atmosphere, 18, 111-120.

5.
Legates, D. R. and McCabe Jr., G. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of \goodness-of -fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model evaluation, Water Resources Research, 35, 233-241. crossref(new window)

6.
Peterson, T. C. and Easterling, D. R. (1994). Creation of homogeneous composite climatological reference series, International Journal of Climatology, 14, 671-680. crossref(new window)

7.
Reeves, J., Chen, J., Wang, X. L., Lund, R. and Lu, Q. (2007). A review and comparison of change point detection techniques for climate data, American Meteorological Society, 46, 900-915.

8.
Ryoo, S.-B., Kim, Y.-H., Kwon, T.-H. and Park, I.-S. (2006). Inhomogeneities in Korean Climate Data (I): Due to site relocation, Atmosphere, 16, 215-223.

9.
Ryoo, S.-B. and Kim, Y.-H. (2007). Inhomogeneities in Korean Climate Data (II): Due to the changes of the Computing procedure of daily mean, Atmosphere, 17, 17-26.

10.
Young, K. (1992). A three-way model for interpolating for monthly precipitation values, Monthly Weather Review, 120, 2561-2569. crossref(new window)