JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of binary data imputation methods in clinical trials
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparison of binary data imputation methods in clinical trials
An, Koosung; Kim, Dongjae;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
We discussed how to handle missing binary data clinical trials. Patterns of occurring missing data are discussed and introduce missing binary data imputation methods that include the modified method. A simulation is performed by modifying actual data for each method. The condition of this simulation is controlled by a response rate and a missing value rate. We list the simulation results for each method and discussed them at the end of this paper.
 Keywords
binary missing data;clinical trial;missing pattern;missing data imputation;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Cho, Y. (2008). An imputation for nonresponses in the survey on the rural living indicators, The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 21, 95-107. crossref(new window)

2.
International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use (1998). Statistical principles for clinical trials E9.

3.
Kang, S. (2013). Medical Statistics Needed for Drug Development, 2nd edition, Freeacademy.

4.
Kim, D. (2011). Solutions for missing values in categorical data, The Korean Association for Comparative Government, 15, 319-342.

5.
Kim, K. (2000). Imputation methods for nonresponse and their effect, The Korean Association for Survey Research, 1, 1-14.

6.
Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey V.

7.
Kwak, M. (2005). Imputation methods for clinical trials data, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 7, 1187-1198.

8.
Little, R. and Rubin, D. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

9.
Park, M. and Lee, J. (1995). Statistical consideration in clinical trials, Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 2, 229-247.

10.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

11.
Montori, V. M. and Guyatt, G. H. (2001). Intention-to-treat principle, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165, 1339-1341.

12.
Yun, S. (2004). Imputation of missing values, Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 37, 209-211.