JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Cattle Manure and Swine Slurry Acidification on Ammonia Emission as Estimated by an Acid Trap System
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Cattle Manure and Swine Slurry Acidification on Ammonia Emission as Estimated by an Acid Trap System
Park, Sang-Hyun; Lee, Bok-Rye; Kim, Tae-Hwan;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of slurry acidification in reducing ammonia emission from manure storage and application. The non-fermented cattle manure (NFC) and swine slurry (SS) were acidified by sulfuric acid and stored in an acryl chamber for 168 and 96 hours, respectively. Ammonia emitted from the chamber was collected using an acid trap system. The amount of ammonia emission was significantly reduced when the livestock manures were treated with sulfuric acid. The absolute amount of ammonia in NFC increased rapidly starting from 48 h and 72 h in the control (pH 8.6) and acidified NFC (pH 6.5), respectively. The absolute amount of ammonia was the highest at 96 h () in the control and at 144 h () in pH 6.5 NFC. The cumulative ammonia content in the control continuously increased until 96 h and was maintained until 168 h, whereas the increase rate of emission gas accumulation in acidified NFC was much less throughout the experimental period. Acidification of SS mitigated ammonia emission as proven in NFC. The cumulative amount of ammonia emission was decreased by 49.4% and 92.3% in the acidified SS at pH 6.5 and pH 5.5, respectively, compared to the control at 96 h after treatment. These results indicate that ammonia emission can be significantly reduced by sulfuric acid treatment of livestock manure during processing and the subsequent land application.
 Keywords
Ammonia emission;Cattle manure;Swine slurry;Acidification;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Al-Kanani, T., Akochi, E., Mackenzie, A.F., Alli, I. and Barrington, S. 1992. Organic and inorganic amendments to reduce ammonia losses from liquid hog manure. Journal of Environmental Quality. 21:709-715.

2.
Bussink, D.W., Huijsmans, J.F.M. and Ketelaars, J.J.M.H. 1994. Ammonia volatilization from nitric-acid-treated cattle slurry surface-applied to grassland. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science. 42:293-309.

3.
Erisman, J.W. and Schaap, M. 2004. The need for ammonia abatement with respect to secondary PM reductions in Europe. Environment Pollution. 129:159-163. crossref(new window)

4.
Frost, J.P., Stevens, R.J. and Laughlin, R.J. 1990. Effect of separation and acidification of cattle slurry on ammonia volatilization and on the efficiency of slurry nitrogen for herbage production. Journal of Agriculture Science. 115:49-56. crossref(new window)

5.
Kim, T.H. and Kim, B.H. 1996. Ammonia microdiffusion and colorimetric method for determining nitrogen in plant tissues. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland Science. 16:253-259.

6.
Kithome, M., Paul, J.W. and Bomke, A.A. 1999. Reducing nitrogen losses during simulated composting of poultry manure using adsorbents or chemical amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality. 28:194-201.

7.
Le, P.D., Aarnink, A.J.A., Ogink, N.W.M., Becker, P.M. and Verstegen, M.W.A. 2005. Odour from animal production facilities: its relationship to diet. Nutrition Research Reviews. 18:3-30. crossref(new window)

8.
Lu, R. 2000. Soil Agricultural Chemical Analysis Methods. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing.

9.
Moiser, A.R. 2001. Exchange of gaseous nitrogen compounds between agricultural system and the atmosphere. Plant and Soil. 228:14-27.

10.
Molloy, S.P. and Tunney, H. 1983. A laboratory study of ammonia volatilization from cattle and pig slurry. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research. 22:37-45.

11.
Ndegwa, P.M., Vaddella, V.K., Hristov, A.N. and Joo, H.S. 2009. Measuring concentration of ammonia in ambient air or exhaust air steam using acid traps. Journal of Environmental Quality. 38:647-653. crossref(new window)

12.
Pan, P.T. and Drapcho, C.M. 2001. Biological anoxic/aerobic treatment of swine waste for reduction of organic carbon, nitrogen, and odor. Transactions of the ASAE. 44: 1789-1796.

13.
Parker, D.B., Pandrangi, S., Greene, L.W., Almas, L.K., Cole, N.A., Rhoades, M.B. and Koziel, J.A. 2005. Rate and frequency of urease inhibitor application for minimizing ammonia emissions from beef cattle feed yards. Transactions of the ASAE. 48:787-793. crossref(new window)

14.
Sanderson, M.G., Collins, W.J., Johnson, C.E. and Derwent, R.G. 2006. Present and future acid deposition to ecosystems: The effect of climate change. Atmospheric Environment. 40:1275-1283. crossref(new window)

15.
Smith, K.A., Jacson, D.R., Misselbrook, T.H., Pain, B.F. and Johnson, R.A. 2000. Reduction of ammonia emission by slurry application techniques. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 77:277-287. crossref(new window)

16.
Sommer, S.G. and Hutchings, N.J. 2001. Ammonia emission from field applied manure and its reduction. European Journal of Agronomy. 15:1-15. crossref(new window)

17.
Sommer, S.G. and Hutchings, N.J. 1995. Techniques and strategies for the reduction of ammonia emission from agriculture. Water Air and Soil Pollution. 85:237-248. crossref(new window)

18.
Stevens, R.J., Laughlin, R.J. and Frost, J.P. 1992b. Effects of separation, dilution, washing and acidification on ammonia volatilization from surface applied cattle slurry. Journal of Agricultural Science. 119:383-389. crossref(new window)

19.
Stevens, R.J., Laughlin, I.L.l., Frost, J.P. and Anderson, R. 1992a. Evaluation of separation plus acidification with nitric acid and separation plus dilution to make cattle slurry a balanced, efficient fertilizer for grass and silage. Journal of Agricultural Science. 119:391-399. crossref(new window)

20.
USEPA. 2004. National Emission Inventory - Ammonia emission from animal husbandry operation. Draft report. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

21.
Varel, V.H. 1997. Use of urease inhibitors to control nitrogen loss from livestock waste. Bioresource Technology. 62:11-17. crossref(new window)