Investigating the Impact of Random and Systematic Errors on GPS Precise Point Positioning Ambiguity Resolution

Title & Authors
Investigating the Impact of Random and Systematic Errors on GPS Precise Point Positioning Ambiguity Resolution
Han, Joong-Hee; Liu, Zhizhao; Kwon, Jay Hyoun;

Abstract
Precise Point Positioning (PPP) is an increasingly recognized precisely the GPS/GNSS positioning technique. In order to improve the accuracy of PPP, the error sources in PPP measurements should be reduced as much as possible and the ambiguities should be correctly resolved. The correct ambiguity resolution requires a careful control of residual errors that are normally categorized into random and systematic errors. To understand effects from two categorized errors on the PPP ambiguity resolution, those two GPS datasets are simulated by generating in locations in South Korea (denoted as SUWN) and Hong Kong (PolyU). Both simulation cases are studied for each dataset; the first case is that all the satellites are affected by systematic and random errors, and the second case is that only a few satellites are affected. In the first case with random errors only, when the magnitude of random errors is increased, L1 ambiguities have a much higher chance to be incorrectly fixed. However, the size of ambiguity error is not exactly proportional to the magnitude of random error. Satellite geometry has more impacts on the L1 ambiguity resolution than the magnitude of random errors. In the first case when all the satellites have both random and systematic errors, the accuracy of fixed ambiguities is considerably affected by the systematic error. A pseudorange systematic error of 5 cm is the much more detrimental to ambiguity resolutions than carrier phase systematic error of 2 mm. In the $\small{2^{nd}}$ case when only a portion of satellites have systematic and random errors, the L1 ambiguity resolution in PPP can be still corrected. The number of allowable satellites varies from stations to stations, depending on the geometry of satellites. Through extensive simulation tests under different schemes, this paper sheds light on how the PPP ambiguity resolution (more precisely L1 ambiguity resolution) is affected by the characteristics of the residual errors in PPP observations. The numerical examples recall the PPP data analysts that how accurate the error correction models must achieve in order to get all the ambiguities resolved correctly.
Keywords
Global Positioning System (GPS);Precise Point Positioning (PPP);Ambiguity Resolution (AR);Random and Systematic Errors;
Language
English
Cited by
References
1.
Abdel-salam, M. (2005), Precise Point Positioning Using Un-differenced Code and Carrier Phase Observations, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, 206p.

2.
Bertiger, W., Desai, S. D., Haines, B., Harvey, N., Moore, A. W., Owen, S., and Weiss, J.P. (2010), Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 84, No. 5, pp. 327-337.

3.
Bisnath, S. B. and Gao, Y. (2009), Current state of precise point positioning and future prospects and limitations, Observing our Changing Earth, Vol. 133, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 615-623.

4.
Brown, R. G. and Hwang, P. Y. C. (1997), Introduction to random signals and applied Kalman filtering 3rd Edition, Wiley, New York, 484p.

5.
Collins, P. (2008), Isolating and estimating undifferenced GPS integer ambiguities. Proceedings of the 2008 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, 28-30 January, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 720-732.

6.
Collins, P., Bisnath, S., Lahaye, F., and Héroux, P. (2010), Undifferenced GPS ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model and ambiguity datum fixing, Journal of the Institute of Navigation, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 123-135.

7.
Dow, J. M., Neilan, R. E., and Rizos, C. (2009), The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 83, No. 3-4, pp. 191-198.

8.
Gao, Y. and Shen, X. (2002), A new method for carrier phase based precise point positioning, Navigation, Journal of the Institute of Navigation, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 109-116.

9.
Ge, M., Gendt, G., Rothacher, M., Shi, C., and Liu, J. (2008), Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 82, No. 7, pp. 389-399.

10.
Geng, J., Meng, X., Dodson, A., and Tefele, N. (2011), Ambiguity Resolution Precise Point Positioning: What methods should we use for Geoscience?, European Geosciences Union General Assembly, 3-8 April, Vienna, Austria, http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2011/EGU2011-3227.pdf (last date accessed: 06 May 2014).

11.
Geng, J., Teferle, F. N., Shi, C., Meng, X., Dodson, A. H., and Liu, J. (2009), Ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning with hourly data, GPS Solutions, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 263-270.

12.
Huber, K., Heuberger, F., Abart, C., Karabatic, A., Weber, R., and Berglez, P. (2010), PPP: Precise Point Positioning - Constraints and Opportunities, Proceeding of the Fig congress, 11-16 April, Sydney, Australia, http://www.fig.net/pub/fig2010/papers/ts10c%5Cts10c_huber_heuberger_et_al_4040.pdf (last date accessed: 06 May 2014).

13.
Kouba, J. (2003), A guide to using International GPS Service (IGS) products, IGS Central Bureau, Pasadena, CA, USA, http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/resource/pubs/GuidetoUsingIGSProducts.pdf (last date accessed: 06 May 2014).

14.
Kouba, J. and Héroux, P. (2001), Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products, GPS Solutions, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 12-28.

15.
Laurichesse, D., Mercier, F., Berthias, J. P., Broca, P., and Cerri, L. (2009), Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination, Journal of the Institute of Navigation, Vol. 56. No. 2, pp. 135-149.

16.
Le, A.Q. and Tiberius, C. (2007), Single-frequency precise point positioning with optimal filtering. GPS Solutions, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 61-69.

17.
Leick, A. (2004), GPS satellite surveying 3rd edition, Wiley, New York, 435p.

18.
Xu, G. (2007), GPS: theory, algorithms and applications 2nd edition, Springer, Berlin, 340p.

19.
Zumberge, J. F., Heflin, M. B., Jefferson, D. C., Watkins, M. M., and Webb, F. H. (1997), Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 102, No. B3, pp. 5005-5017.