JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Spatial Distribution on Change Detection in Animated Choropleth Maps
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Spatial Distribution on Change Detection in Animated Choropleth Maps
Moon, Seonggook; Kim, Eun-Kyeong; Hwang, Chul-Sue;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
To address unsolved issues of change detection in animated choropleth maps, we proposed the concept of `gross change detection` and performed an experiment that empirically verifies the incidence of change blindness stems from the `magnitude of change (MOC)`, spatial distribution in animated choropleth maps. We generated experimental materials using the change-characterization arrays and the global Moran`s I. Participants had 108 cases of changing maps with time duration (1 to 3 sec) and had questions. The results showed that MOC and duration affect gross change detection, but the most interesting result from our experiment was that different spatial distributions between two adjacent choropleth maps may lead the map reader to under- or over-estimate the level of gross change in the map. It implies that we should consider spatial distribution of change when we design animated choropleth maps.
 Keywords
Animated Choropleth Maps;Change Blindness;Magnitude of Change;Spatial Distribution of Change;Spatial Contiguity;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Quantifying the Visual Impact of Classification Boundaries in Choropleth Maps, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2017, 23, 1, 371  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Complexity reduction in choropleth map animations by autocorrelation weighted generalization of time-series data, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2017, 1545-0465, 1  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Demsar, U., Dransch, D., Dykes, J., Fabrikant, S.I., Jern, M., Kraak, M.J., Schumann, H., and Tominski, C. (2010), Space, time and visual analytics, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1577-1600. crossref(new window)

2.
Betrancourt, M. and Tversky, B. (2000), Effects of computer animation on users' performance: a review, Le Travail Humain, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 311-329.

3.
Cinnamon, J. (2009), Evaluating web-based static, animated and interactive maps for injury prevention, Geospatial Health, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-16. crossref(new window)

4.
Coltekin, A., Heil, B., Garlandini, S., and Fabrikant, S.I. (2009), Evaluating the effectiveness of interactive map interface designs: a case study integrating usability metrics with eye-movement analysis, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 5-17. crossref(new window)

5.
DiBiase, D., MacEachren, A., Krygier, J.B., and Reeves, C. (1992), Animation and the role of map design in scientific visualization, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 201-214. crossref(new window)

6.
Fish, C. (2010), Change Detection in Animated Choropleth Maps, Master's thesis, Michigan State University, Michigan, USA, 139p.

7.
Garlandini S. and Fabrikant, S.I. (2009), Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of visual variables for geographic information visualization, Spatial Information Theory: 9th International Conference, COSIT 2009, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, pp. 195-211.

8.
Goldsberry , K. and Battersby, S. (2009), Issues of change detection in animated choropleth maps, Cartographica, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 201-215. crossref(new window)

9.
Griffin, A.L., MacEachren, A.M., Hardisty, F., Steiner, E., and Li B. (2006), A comparison of animated maps with static small-multiple maps for visually identifying spacetime clusters, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 740-753. crossref(new window)

10.
Harrower, M. (2007), The cognitive limits of animated maps, Cartographica, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 349-357. crossref(new window)

11.
Hegarty, M., Canham, M.S., and Fabrikant, S.I. (2010), Thinking about the weather: how display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 37-53.

12.
Kossoulakou, A. and Kraak, M.J. (1992), Spatio-temporal maps and cartographic communication, Cartographic Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 101-108. crossref(new window)

13.
MacEachren, A.M. (1995), How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization and Design, The Guilford Press, N.Y.

14.
Mayer, R.E. (2001), Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, N.Y.

15.
Mayer, R.E. and Chandler, P. (2001), When learning is just a click away: does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages?, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 390-397. crossref(new window)

16.
Montello, D.R. (2002), Cognitive map-design research in the twentieth century: theoretical and empirical approaches, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 283-304. crossref(new window)

17.
Moran, P.A. (1948), The interpretation of statistical maps, Biometrika, Vol. 37, pp. 178-181.

18.
Morrison, J.B. and Tversky, B. (2001), The (in)effectiveness of animation in instruction, In: Jacko, J. and Sears, A.(eds), Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA, pp. 377-378.

19.
Peterson, M.P. (1995), Interactive and Animated Cartography, Prentice Hall, NJ.

20.
Slocum, T.A., Sluter, R.S, Kessler, F.C., and Yoder, S.C. (2004), A qualitative evaluation of MapTime, a program for exploring spatiotemporal point data, Cartographica, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 43-68. crossref(new window)

21.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., and Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998), Cognitive architecture and instructional design, Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 10, pp. 251-296. crossref(new window)