JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Accuracy Comparison Between Image-based 3D Reconstruction Technique and Terrestrial LiDAR for As-built BIM of Outdoor Structures
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Accuracy Comparison Between Image-based 3D Reconstruction Technique and Terrestrial LiDAR for As-built BIM of Outdoor Structures
Lee, Jisang; Hong, Seunghwan; Cho, Hanjin; Park, Ilsuk; Cho, Hyoungsig; Sohn, Hong-Gyoo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
With the increasing demands of 3D spatial information in urban environment, the importance of point clouds generation techniques have been increased. In particular, for as-built BIM, the point clouds with the high accuracy and density is required to describe the detail information of building components. Since the terrestrial LiDAR has high performance in terms of accuracy and point density, it has been widely used for as-built 3D modelling. However, the high cost of devices is obstacle for general uses, and the image-based 3D reconstruction technique is being a new attraction as an alternative solution. This paper compares the image-based 3D reconstruction technique and the terrestrial LiDAR in point of establishing the as-built BIM of outdoor structures. The point clouds generated from the image-based 3D reconstruction technique could roughly present the 3D shape of a building, but could not precisely express detail information, such as windows, doors and a roof of building. There were 13.2~28.9 cm of RMSE between the terrestrial LiDAR scanning data and the point clouds, which generated from smartphone and DSLR camera images. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that the image-based 3D reconstruction can be used in drawing building footprint and wireframe, and the terrestrial LiDAR is suitable for detail 3D outdoor modeling.
 Keywords
Terrestrial LiDAR;Image-based 3D Reconstruction;Building Information Modelling (BIM);point clouds;Structure from Motion (SfM);
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Evaluation of Geometric Error Sources for Terrestrial Laser Scanner, Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System, 2016, 24, 2, 79  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Autodesk (2015), Revit, Autodesk, California, http://www.autodesk.com/products/revit-family/overview (last date accessed: 31 January 2015).

2.
Bartoš, K., Pukanská, K., and Sabová, J. (2014), Overview of available open-source photogrammetric software, its use and analysis, International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 62-70.

3.
Besl, P.J. and McKay, N.D. (1992), A method for registration of 3-D shapes, SPIE 1611, Sensor Fusion IV: Control Paradigms and Data Structures, 586, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 30 April, Boston, MA, pp. 586-606.

4.
Bhatla, A., Choe, S.Y., Fierro, O., and Leite, F. (2012), Evaluation of accuracy of as-built 3D modeling from photos taken by handheld digital cameras, Automation in Construction, Vol. 28, pp. 116-127. crossref(new window)

5.
Brutto, M.L. and Meli, P. (2012), Computer vision tools for 3D modelling in archaeology, International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era, Vol. 1, pp. 1-6.

6.
Cho, H., Hong, S., Kim, S., Park, H., Park, I., and Sohn, H.-G. (2015), Application of a terrestrial LIDAR system for elevation mapping in Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica, Sensors, Vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 23514-23535 crossref(new window)

7.
Dai, F. and Lu, M. (2010), Assessing the accuracy of applying photogrammetry to take geometric measurements on building products, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 2, pp. 242-250. crossref(new window)

8.
Dai, F., Rashidi, A., Brilakis, I., and Vela, P. (2013), Comparison of image-based and time-of-flight-based technologies for three-dimensional reconstruction of infrastructure, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 139, No. 1, pp. 69-79. crossref(new window)

9.
Dassot, M., Constant, T., and Fournier, M. (2011), The use of terrestrial LiDAR technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges, Annals of Forest Science, Vol. 68, No. 5, pp. 959-974. crossref(new window)

10.
De Reu, J., Plets, G., Verhoeven, G., De Smedt, P., Bats, M., Cherretté, B., De Maeyer, W., Deconynck, J., Herremans, D., and Laloo, P. (2013), Towards a three-dimensional cost-effective registration of the archaeological heritage, Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 1108-1121. crossref(new window)

11.
Dowling, T., Read, A., and Gallant, J. (2009), Very high resolution DEM acquisition at low cost using a digital camera and free software, Proceedings of 18th World IMACS/MODSIM International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 13–17 July, Australia, pp. 2479-2485.

12.
Fischler, M.A. and Bolles, R.C. (1981), Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 381-395. crossref(new window)

13.
Golparvar-Fard, M., Bohn, J., Teizer, J., Savarese, S., and Peña-Mora, F. (2011), Evaluation of image-based modeling and laser scanning accuracy for emerging automated performance monitoring techniques, Automation in Construction, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 1143-1155. crossref(new window)

14.
Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. (2003), Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

15.
Hong, S.H., Cho, H.S., Kim, N.H., and Sohn, H.G. (2015), 3D indoor modeling based on terrestrial laser scanning, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 525-531. (in Korean with English abstract) crossref(new window)

16.
Hwang, J.T., Weng, J.S., and Tsai, Y.T. (2012), 3D modeling and accuracy assessment-a case study of photosynth, 20th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Geoinformatics, 15-17 June, Hong Kong, pp. 1-6.

17.
Isikdag, U., Zlatanova, S., and Underwood, J. (2013), A BIM-oriented model for supporting indoor navigation requirements, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 41, pp. 112-123. crossref(new window)

18.
Jazayeri, I., Rajabifard, A., and Kalantari, M. (2014), A geometric and semantic evaluation of 3D data sourcing methods for land and property information, Land Use Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 219-230. crossref(new window)

19.
Jones, L. (2006), Monitoring landslides in hazardous terrain using terrestrial LiDAR: an example from Montserrat, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 371-373. crossref(new window)

20.
Jung, J., Hong, S., Jeong, S., Kim, S., Cho, H., Hong, S., and Heo, J. (2014), Productive modeling for development of as-built BIM of existing indoor structures, Automation in Construction, Vol. 42, pp. 68-77. crossref(new window)

21.
Kersten, T.P. and Lindstaedt, M. (2012), Image-based low-cost systems for automatic 3D recording and modelling of archaeological finds and objects, In: Marinos I., Dieter F., Johanna L., Rob D., Fabio R., and Rossella C. (eds.), Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 1-10.

22.
Klein, L., Li, N. and Becerik-Gerber, B. (2012), Imaged-based verification of as-built documentation of operational buildings, Automation in Construction, Vol. 21, pp. 161-171 crossref(new window)

23.
Leica Geosystems (2007), Datasheet of Leica ScanStation 2, Leica Geosystems, Switzerland, http://hds.leica-geosystems.com (last date accessed: 31 January 2015).

24.
Lourakis, M. and Argyros, A. (2004), The design and implementation of a generic sparse bundle adjustment software package based on the levenberg-marquardt algorithm, Technical Report 340, Institute of Computer Science-FORTH, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 5.

25.
Lowe, D.G. (2004), Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 91-110. crossref(new window)

26.
Microsoft (2008), Photosynth, Microsoft, Washington, https://photosynth.net (last date accessed: 31 January 2015).

27.
Pomaska, G. (2009), Utilization of photosynth point clouds for 3D object reconstruction. Proceedings of the 22nd CIPA symposium, International Committee for Documentation of Cultural Heritage, 11-15 October, Kyoto, Japan, p. 5.

28.
Prokop, A. (2008), Assessing the applicability of terrestrial laser scanning for spatial snow depth measurements, Cold Regions Science and Technology, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 155-163. crossref(new window)

29.
Randall, T. (2011), Construction engineering requirements for integrating laser scanning technology and building information modeling, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 137, No. 10, pp. 797-805. crossref(new window)

30.
Snavely, N., Seitz, S. M., and Szeliski, R. (2006), Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 835-846 crossref(new window)

31.
Snavely, N., Seitz, S.M., and Szeliski, R. (2007), Modeling the world from internet photo collections, International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 189-210.

32.
Su, Y., Hashash, Y. and Liu, L. (2006), Integration of construction as-built data via laser scanning with geotechnical monitoring of urban excavation, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 12, pp. 1234-1241. crossref(new window)

33.
Tang, P., Huber, D., Akinci, B., Lipman, R., and Lytle, A. (2010), Automatic reconstruction of as-built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: A review of related techniques, Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 829-843. crossref(new window)

34.
Uricchio, W. (2011), The algorithmic turn: photosynth, augmented reality and the changing implications of the image, Visual Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 25-35. crossref(new window)

35.
Yang, M.D., Chao, C.F., Huang, K.S., Lu, L.Y., and Chen, Y.P. (2013), Image-based 3D scene reconstruction and exploration in augmented reality, Automation in Construction, Vol. 33, pp. 48-60. crossref(new window)