JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparative Analysis among Radar Image Filters for Flood Mapping
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparative Analysis among Radar Image Filters for Flood Mapping
Kim, Daeseong; Jung, Hyung-Sup; Baek, Wonkyung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Due to the characteristics of microwave signals, Radar satellite image has been used for flood detection without weather and time influence. The more methods of flood detection were developed, the more detection rate of flood area has been increased. Since flood causes a lot of damages, flooded area should be distinguished from non flooded area. Also, the detection of flood area should be accurate. Therefore, not only image resolution but also the filtering process is critical to minimize resolution degradation. Although a resolution of radar images become better as technology develops, there were a limited focused on a highly suitable filtering methods for flood detection. Thus, the purpose of this study is to find out the most appropriate filtering method for flood detection by comparing three filtering methods: Lee filter, Frost filter and NL-means filter. Therefore, to compare the filters to detect floods, each filters are applied to the radar image. Comparison was drawn among filtered images. Then, the flood map, results of filtered images are compared in that order. As a result, Frost and NL-means filter are more effective in removing the speckle noise compared to Lee filter. In case of Frost filter, resolution degradation occurred severly during removal of the noise. In case of NL-means filter, shadow effect which could be one of the main reasons that causes false detection were not eliminated comparing to other filters. Nevertheless, result of NL-means filter shows the best detection rate because the number of shadow pixels is relatively low in entire image. Kappa coefficient is scored 0.81 for NL-means filtered image and 0.55, 0.64 and 0.74 follows for non filtered image, Lee filtered image and Frost filtered image respectively. Also, in the process of NL-means filter, speckle noise could be removed without resolution degradation. Accordingly, flooded area could be distinguished effectively from other area in NL-means filtered image.
 Keywords
Satellite SAR;Flood Detection;NL-means Filter;Lee Filter;Frost Filter;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2017, 8, 2, 1185  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Bazi, Y., Bruzzone, L., and Melgani, F. (2007), Image thresholding based on the EM algorithm and the generalized gaussian distribution, Pattern Recognition, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 619-634. crossref(new window)

2.
Buades, A. and Coll, B. (2005), A non-local algorithm for image denoising, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, NO. 8, pp. 60-65.

3.
Dellepiane, S., Bo, G., Monni, S., and Buck, C. (2000), SAR images and interferometric coherence for flood monitoring, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium(IGARSS), 2000 IEEE Internatinal, 24-28 July, Honolulu, USA, Vol. 6, pp. 2608-2610.

4.
Frost, V.S., Stiles, J.A., Shanmugan, K.S., and Holtzman, J.C. (1982), A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise, IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 4, NO. 2, pp. 157-165.

5.
Kiem, A.S., Franks, S.W., and Kuczera, G. (2003), Multi-decadal variability of flood risk, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.30, NO.2, pp. 1035-1041.

6.
Kropatsch, W.G. and Strobl, D. (1990), The generation of SAR layover and shadow maps from digital elevation models, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 28, NO. 1, pp. 98-107. crossref(new window)

7.
Lee, J.S. (1981), Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics, IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 165-168.

8.
Martinis, S. and Twele, A. (2010), A hierarchical spatiotemporal markov model for Improved flood mapping using multi-temporal X-band SAR data, Remote Sensing, Vol. 2, No. 9, pp. 2240-2258. crossref(new window)

9.
De Moel, H. and Aerts, J.C.J.H. (2011), Effect of uncertainty in land use damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates, Natural Hazard, Vol.5, NO.1, pp. 407-425.

10.
Mason, D.C., Davenport, I.J., Neal, J.C., Schumann, G.J.-P., and Bates, P.D. (2012), Near real-time flood detection in urban and rural areas using high-resolution synthetic aperture radar images, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 50, No. 8, pp. 3041-3052. crossref(new window)

11.
Mason, D.C., Horritt, M.S., Dall`Amico, J.T., Scott, T.R., and Bates, P.D. (2007), Improving river flood extent delineation from synthetic aperture radar using airborne laser altimetry, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 45, No. 12, pp. 3932-3943. crossref(new window)

12.
Oberstadler, R., Hönsch, H., and Huth, D. (1997), Assessment of the mapping capabilities of ERS-1 SAR data for flood mapping a case study in Germany, Hydrological Process, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 1415-1425. crossref(new window)

13.
O`Grady, D., Leblanc, M., and Gillieson, D. (2013), Relationship of local incidence angle with satellite radar backscatter for different surface conditions, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 42-53. crossref(new window)

14.
Pulvirenti, L., Pierdicca, N., Chini, M., and Guerriero, L. (2011), An algorithm for operational flood mapping from Synthetic Aperture Radar(SAR) data using fuzzy logic, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 529-540. crossref(new window)

15.
Schumann, G.J.-P., Neal, J.C., Mason, D.C., and Bates, P.D. (2011), The accuracy of sequential aerial photography and SAR data for observing urban flood dynamics a case study of the UK summer 2007 floods, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 115, No. 10, pp. 2536-2546. crossref(new window)

16.
Touzi, R., Lopes, A., Bruniquel, J., and Vachon, P.W. (1999), Coherence estimation for SAR imagery, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp.135-149. crossref(new window)

17.
Xie, H., Pierce, L.E., and Ulaby, F.T. (2002), SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and markov random field modeling, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 40, No. 10, pp. 2196-2212. crossref(new window)