JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Flow-based Mobility Support Mechanism in Proxy MIPv6 based Network
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Flow-based Mobility Support Mechanism in Proxy MIPv6 based Network
Lee, Jae-Hwoon; Kim, Young-Han;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is the network-based mobility management protocol that network supports the mobility of mobile node (MN) on behalf of the MN. In PMIPv6, a multi-homed MN can connect to the PMIPv6 domain by using only one interface even though it has multiple interfaces. It would be efficient when such a multi-homed MN connects to the PMIPv6 domain by using all of its interfaces. If such a multi-homed MN utilizes all of its interfaces, flow mobility can be provided that the MN handovers one or more flows from one interface to another without re-establishing session. In this paper, we propose the flow-based mobility management protocol by considering the intention of the user. The Router Advertisement (RA) message is used in order for the PMIPv6 domain to inform that the MN can utilize the flow mobility. The proposed mechanism is evaluated by analyzing signaling overhead and handover latency, and the numerical results show that the performance is affected by mobility speed of the MN and the failure probability of the wireless link.
 Keywords
IP Mobility;Proxy MIPv6;Flow Mobility;Multiple Interface;Multihoming;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
PMIPv6에서 QoS 측정값에 따른 Flow Mobility 방안 제안,이성로;김수현;장대웅;민상원;

한국통신학회논문지, 2014. vol.39C. 9, pp.782-788 crossref(new window)
2.
항만 내 네트워크의 이동성 지원을 위한 PMIPv6망의 NEMO 지원 기법,민상원;한경일;정민아;이성로;

한국통신학회논문지, 2014. vol.39C. 8, pp.674-680 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
D. Johnson, C. Perkins and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004.

2.
R. Wakikawa, V. Devarapalli, G. Tsirtsis, T. Ernst and K. Nagami, "Multiple Care-of Addresses Registration", RFC 5648, Oct., 2009.

3.
G. Tsirtsis, G. Giarreta, H. Soliman and N. Montavont, "Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings", RFC 6088, Jan., 2011.

4.
H. Soliman, G. Tsirtsis, N. Montavont, G. Giaretta and K. Kuladinithi, "Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and NEMO Basic Support", RFC 6089, Jan., 2011.

5.
S. Gundavelli, K. Leung, V. Devarapalli, K. Chowdhury and B. Patil, "Proxy Mobile IPv6", RFC 5213, Aug., 2008.

6.
C. Larsson, M. Eriksson and P. Arvidsson, "Simultaneous Multi-Access and Flow Mobility Support for PMIPv6", Internet-draft, Work in Progress, Mar., 2009.

7.
M. Hui and H. Deng, "PMIPv6 Multihoming Extension and Synchronization in LMA and MAG", Internet-draft, Work in Progress, Mar., 2010.

8.
M. Hui, G. Chen and H. Deng, "Service Flow Identifier in Proxy Mobile IPv6", Internet-draft, Work in Progress, Mar., 2010.

9.
R. Koodli and K. Chowdhury, "Flow Handover for Proxy Mobile IPv6", Internet-draft, Work in Progress, Oct., 2009.

10.
M. Jeyatharan, C. Ng, S. Gundavelli, K. Leung and V. Devarapalli, "Partial Handoff Support in PMIPv6", Internet-draft, Work in Progress, Mar., 2010.

11.
R. Braden, "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, Oct., 1989.

12.
J. Lee and T. Chung, "How much do we gain by introducing route optimization in Proxy Mobile IPv6 networks?" Annals of Telecommunications, Vol.65, No.5-6, pp.233-246, June 2010. crossref(new window)

13.
S. Jeon, N. Kang, Y. Kim, and W. Yoon, "Enhanced PMIPv6 Route Optimization Handover," IEICE Transactions on Communications Vol. E91-B, No.11, pp.3715-3718, Nov., 2008. crossref(new window)

14.
J. Xie and I.F Akyildiz, "An optimal location management scheme for minimizing signaling Cost in Mobile IP," Proc, IEEE International Conference on Communications, Vol.5, pp.3313-3317, Apr., 2002.

15.
C. Makaya and S. Pierre, "An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based Mobility Management Protocols," IEEE Transactions on wireless communications, Vol.7, No3, pp.972-983, Mar., 2008. crossref(new window)