JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Evaluation of Life Cycle Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission of Elementary School of Buildings
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Evaluation of Life Cycle Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission of Elementary School of Buildings
Ji, Changyoon; Hong, Taehoon; Jeong, Jaewook;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study investigates and analyzes the total amount of energy consumption and emission during the material manufacturing, transportation, construction, operation, and disposal phases of eight elementary school buildings in South Korea. Toward this ends, the hybrid LCA model is proposed. The life cycle energy consumption and emission of eight case buildings are assessed using the hybrid LCA model with an assumption that the operation period is 40 years. As a result, the embodied(sum of the energy consumption in the material manufacturing, transportation and construction phases), operational and disposal energy were 2,279, 11,182, , respectively, on average. The average embodied, operational, and disposal emission were 604, 2,708, 60 kg-, respectively, on average. This result indicates that about 17% of life cycle energy (or emission) is consumed in the material manufacturing, transportation and construction phases. Thus, it is necessary to consider the embodied energy and emission to reduce the life cycle energy and emission of school buildings. In addition, while the insulation standard of building have been provided based on the climate zone, energy consumption in operation phase still varied depending on the regions in this study. Thus, the insulation standard of building needs to be improved through considering the climate of regions in detail.
 Keywords
Life Cycle;Energy Consumption;Carbon Dioxide Emission;Embodied Energy;Elementary School Building;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Chang Y., Ries R.J., and Lei S. (2012). "The embodied energy and emissions of a high-rise education building: A quantification using process-based hybrid life cycle inventory model." Energ. Buildings., 55, pp. 790-798. crossref(new window)

2.
Gustavsson L., Joelsson A., and Sathre R. (2010). "Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building." Energ. Buildings, 42, pp. 230-242. crossref(new window)

3.
Hong T., Jeong K., and Ji C., (2014a). "Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Green and Traditional Buildings using Life Cycle Assessment." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 15(3), pp. 55-62.

4.
Hong T., Ji C., Jang M., and Park H. (2014b). "Assessment Model for Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions during the Construction Phase." J. Manage. Eng., 30(2), pp. 226-235. crossref(new window)

5.
Hong T., and Ji C. (2014). "Comparison of the $CO_2$ Emissions of Buildings using Input-Output LCA Model and Hybrid LCA Model."Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 15(4), pp. 119-127. crossref(new window)

6.
Hong T., Koo C., and Kim H. (2012a). "A Decision Support Model for Improving a Multi-Family Housing Complex based on $CO_2$ Emission from Electricity Consumption." J. Environ. Manage., 112(15), pp. 67-78. crossref(new window)

7.
Hong T., Koo C., and Jeong K. (2012). "A Decision Support Model for Reducing Electric Energy Consumption in Elementary School Facilities." Appl. Energ., 95(7), pp. 253-266. crossref(new window)

8.
ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework. International Organization for Standardization.

9.
Jang M., Hong T., and Ji C. (2015). "Hybrid LCA model for assessing the embodied environmental impacts of buildings in South Korea." Environ. Impact Asses., 50, pp. 143-155. crossref(new window)

10.
Jeong K., Ji C., Koo C., Hong T., and Park H. (2015). "A Model for predicting the Environmental Impact of educational facilities in the project planning phase." J. Clean. Prod., 107, pp. 538-549. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim T., Lee K., and Hong W. (2012). "Energy consumption characteristics of the elementary schools in South Korea." Energ. Buildings, 54, pp. 480-489. crossref(new window)

12.
Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI) (2015). 2014 Energy Consumption Survey. Korea Energy Economics Institute, Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy.

13.
Lee K., Tae S., and Shin S. (2009). "Development of a Life Cycle Assessment Program for building (SUSBLCA) in South Korea." Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 13(8), pp. 1994-2002. crossref(new window)

14.
Lee M., Kim W., Lee W., and Lee W. (2012). "A Study about Reduction Rates of Building Energy Demand for a Detached House according to Building Energy Efficient Methods." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(5), pp. 275-282.

15.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2014). First Green Building Master plan in South Korea. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

16.
Ramesh T., Prakash R., and Shukla K., (2010). "Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview." Energ. Buildings, 42, pp. 1592-1600. crossref(new window)