JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Transfer of Students' Understanding of NOS through SSI Instruction
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Transfer of Students' Understanding of NOS through SSI Instruction
Chung, Yoonsook; Kim, Sung-Won;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Citizens should be sensitive to the complex and controversial SSIs (Socioscientific Issues), be able to make a responsible decision with evidence and empathy, and furthermore take political action for the larger welfare. The premise of this research is that understanding the nature of science (NOS) takes an important role when students and adults participate in the discourse on SSIs because SSI reasoning requires individuals to examine information and counter-information with skepticism. We therefore designed SSI programs that were incorporated with NOS by adapting a contextualized-reflective approach. The leading research question was to what extent SSI contexts contributed to promoting students' understanding of NOS. A total of 71 11th grade students participated in this program. The school was located in an urban city near the capital city of Seoul, South Korea. We designed SSI programs to cover the issues of genetically modified organisms, climate change, and nuclear energy. Each issue required four to six class periods to complete. We conducted pre- and post-program tests using the revised VNOS-C, recorded group discussions or debates and collected student worksheets to observe the increase of student NOS understanding. As a result of this program, students showed moderate improvement in their understanding of NOS.
 Keywords
Nature of Science;SSI;Scientific Literacy;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
언어 네트워크 분석을 이용한 과학의 본성에 관한 국내연구 동향,이상균;

대한지구과학교육학회지, 2016. vol.9. 1, pp.65-87 crossref(new window)
2.
성별, 계열, 과학 성적이 고등학생의 물리에 관한 관점에 미치는 영향,최혁준;

새물리, 2016. vol.66. 6, pp.696-704 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). The influence of history of science courses on students' conceptions of the nature of science. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Oregon State University, Oregon.

2.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Science Education, 88(5), 785-810. crossref(new window)

3.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095. crossref(new window)

4.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835-855. crossref(new window)

5.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317. crossref(new window)

6.
Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653-680. crossref(new window)

7.
Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377-394. crossref(new window)

8.
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

9.
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

10.
Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352-377. crossref(new window)

11.
Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563-581. crossref(new window)

12.
Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers' understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 414-436. crossref(new window)

13.
Bianchini, J. A., & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177-209. crossref(new window)

14.
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Reconceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. crossref(new window)

15.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath.

16.
Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315. crossref(new window)

17.
Fleming, R. (1986a). Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues, part I: Social cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 677-687. crossref(new window)

18.
Fleming, R. (1986b). Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues part II: Nonsocial cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 689-698. crossref(new window)

19.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578. crossref(new window)

20.
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395-418. crossref(new window)

21.
Kolsto S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. crossref(new window)

22.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. crossref(new window)

23.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

24.
Lee, Y-H. (2013). Nature of Science (NOS) Presentation in the Introductory Chapters of Korean High School Life Science I Textbooks Using a Qualitative Content Analysis. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 17(1), 173-197.

25.
Matkins, J. J., & Bell, R. L. (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 137-163. crossref(new window)

26.
Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 389-407. crossref(new window)

27.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

28.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future: A report with ten recommendations. King's College London: Fulmar Colour Printing Company Limited.

29.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MEST]. (2011). National science curriculum. Seoul: MEST.

30.
National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: Natioanl Academy Press.

31.
National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (1982). Science-Technology-Society: Science education for the 1980s. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.

32.
Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409. crossref(new window)

33.
Sadler, T. D., Klosterman, M. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2011). Learing science content and socio-scientific reasoning through classroom explorations of global climate change. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: teaching, learning and research (pp. 45-77). New York: Springer.

34.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2000). Making connections between the nature of science and scientific inquiry: A science research internship for preservice teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Akron, OH.

35.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610-645. crossref(new window)

36.
Tamir, P. (1972). Understanding the process of science by students exposed to different science curricula in Israel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9(3), 239-245. crossref(new window)

37.
Tao, P. K. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students' understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 147-171. crossref(new window)

38.
Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410. crossref(new window)

39.
Yoo, M. H. (1999). (The) development of scientific history program and its effects of application on middle school science instruction. (Unpublished master dissertation), Seoul National University, Seoul.

40.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. crossref(new window)

41.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. crossref(new window)

42.
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367. crossref(new window)