JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Development of a Play-Learning Model in Science Museum
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Development of a Play-Learning Model in Science Museum
Kwon, Yi-Young; Jeong, Eunyoung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this study, a science museum teaching-learning model was developed with emphasis on play. In order to do this, the models of factor-centered museum education and process-centered museum education were reviewed and characteristics of science museum education were considered. The model developed in this study is called `Play-Learning Model in Science Museum`, and `play` is defined as activities to achieve the mission in accordance with methods and rules set by individuals or small groups including scaffolding and play is divided into competition, simulation, and chance. `Play-Learning Model in Science Museum` emphasizes learning using the articles on exhibition, scaffolding and interaction in small groups, and play. The model consists of four steps: `Preparation`, `Exploring the exhibits`, `Experience`, and `Summary of learning content`. In the `Preparation` step, the students form related knowledge and are ready to play. The `Exploring the exhibits` step is the core step of this model, and entails the students solving problems in the mission by interacting with members of the small group. When they cannot find resolution, they get help. In the `Experience` step, hands-on activities related to the prior step are included. In the `Summary of learning content` step, the students summarize what they learned while playing. As science museum education is implemented in a variety of forms, continuous research about the science museum learning model and development of various programs are needed.
 Keywords
science museum education;science museum learning model;play;scaffolding;exhibits-based;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Baek, R. (2002). A theory and characters of museum education. Journal of Museum Studies, 2002(5), 141-159.

2.
Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. NAEYC Research and Practice Series, 7. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

3.
Blatchford, P. (1992). Children's attitudes to work at 11 years. Educational Studies, 18(1), 107-118. crossref(new window)

4.
Borun, M., Chambers, M., & Cleghorn, A. (1996). Families are learning in science museums. Curator, 39(2), 123-138. crossref(new window)

5.
Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1-12.

6.
Cailois, R. (1967). Les Jeux et les Hommes. Paris: Gallimard. Lee, S. (translation)(2003). Play and man. Seoul: Munye publisher.

7.
Caswell, R., & Warman, T. (2014). Play for today. UK: Eureka The National Children's Museum.

8.
Cheon, D. (2012). Development of experience learning program of unit'Composition of Material' of second-year science of middle school based on the genesis learning model: Focusing on the basic science museum of national Gwacheon science museum. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

9.
Choi, J., Kang, I., Guk, S., Kim, J., Park, Y., Baek R., Seo, W., Yang, J., Oh, M., Im, J., Jang, H., Jeong, C., & Choi, H. (2010). Korea museum pedagogy. Seoul: Muneumsa.

10.
Choi, M. (2013). Understanding the guided tour by docents in terms of scaffolding in science museums. Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, South Korea.

11.
Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200-218. crossref(new window)

12.
Diamond, J. (1996). Playing and learning. ASTC Newsletter, 24(4), 2-6.

13.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58. crossref(new window)

14.
Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190. crossref(new window)

15.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums. MD: Altamira Press.

16.
Friedman, A. J. (2010). The evolution of the science museum. Physics Today, 63(10), 45-51.

17.
Flick, L. B. (2000). Cognitive scaffolding that fosters scientific inquiry in middle level science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(2), 109-129. crossref(new window)

18.
Frost, J. L., & Klein, B. L. (1979). Children's play and playgrounds. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

19.
Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 689-703. crossref(new window)

20.
Greenhill, E. H. (2007). Museum and education. London: Routledge.

21.
Han, M., Yang, C., & Noh, T. (2010). Perceptions and educational needs of teachers for instructions using the science museum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(8), 1060-1074.

22.
Hein, G. E. (2002). Learning in museum. London: Routledge.

23.
Hein. H. S. (2000). The museum in transit: A philosophical perspective. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.

24.
Hill, J., & Hannafin, M. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52. crossref(new window)

25.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1999). The educational role of the museum. London: Routledge.

26.
Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: The Beacon Press. Lee, J. (translation)(2010). Homo Ludens. Gyeonggido Goyang: Yeonamseoga.

27.
Hwang, J. (2008). A case study on museum-kindergarten collaborative education: Development and application of a sustainable museum-aided teaching model. Master's thesis, Kyunghee University, Seoul, South Korea.

28.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children's attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 55-83.

29.
Jeon, Y., & Lee, Y. (2010). The analysis of visitors' behavior patterns and the "Science Park for Kids" exhibits characteristics in the National Gwacheon Science Museum. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21(1), 105-116. crossref(new window)

30.
Kang, I., & Hong, H. (2009). The development and implementation of a PBL-based museum education program-The case study of Kyunghee University Natural History Museum-. Art Education Review, 34, 1-38.

31.
Kang, I., & Seol, Y. (2009). A case study of the development of a museum educational program based upon object-based learning. Art Education Review, 33, 1-38.

32.
Kang, Y. (1999). Theoretical basis of experience learning. The Journal of Korea Open Education, 7(2), 5-18.

33.
Kim, C., Shin, M., & Lee, S. (2010). Understanding informal science learning. Seoul: Bookshill.

34.
Kim, C., Shin, M., Lee, C., & Cha, H. (2006). School earth science curriculum reflected in exhibits and an educational analysis of exhibition methods: Cases of Natural History Museums in the U.S. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(2), 130-139.

35.
Kim, D. (2009). Analysis of natural history museums and applications as means of biological education. Master's thesis, Kyunghee University, Seoul, South Korea.

36.
Kim, J. (2007). A study on an efficient english class model in elementary school based on ZPD. Doctor's thesis, Kookmin University, Seoul, South Korea.

37.
Kim, K., Heo, J., Lee, S., & Kim, C. (2007). The characteristics of parent-child dyadic discourses in an informal learning setting: Focusing on the ZPD system. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 832-847.

38.
Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments(TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computer & Education, 56(2), 403-417. crossref(new window)

39.
Kim, S. (2013). Development and application of an aesthetic education model for museum education: Based on Lincoln Center Institute's method. Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, South Korea.

40.
Kolb, D. A. (1999). Learning style inventory, Version 3. Boston: Hay/Mcber.

41.
Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation(2013). Korean students' academic ability characteristics shown in TIMSS 2011 result. Research Reports. ORM 2013-17.

42.
Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282-293.

43.
Lee, I., Yoo, J., & Chung, K. (2012). An analysis in visitors' attentions on exhibit panels of a Tesla Coil in the Gwacheon National Science Museum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 46-63. crossref(new window)

44.
Lim, J., & Lee, B. (2014). A analysis of students' behavior patterns in science museums according to watching rate and watching hour: Focused on the basic science hall in Gwacheon National Science Museum. The Journal of Research of Curriculum & Instruction, 18(4), 1011-1032. crossref(new window)

45.
Lee, M. (2011). Development of an education program using natural history museums: Based on the'Evolution of life' in science of high school. Master's thesis, Kyunghee University, Seoul, South Korea.

46.
Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2013). A study on the long-term development strategy for fostering Daegu National Science Museum. Research Reports 2013-12-19.

47.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.

48.
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trips in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097-1119. crossref(new window)

49.
Park, H., & Lee, S. (2013). A study on behavioral patterns and satisfaction of visitors depending on the characteristic of exhibition in science museum. Journal of Korean Earth Science Education, 6(3), 185-195.

50.
Parten, M. (1932). Social participation among children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27, 243-269. crossref(new window)

51.
Pearce, M. S. (1992). Museums, objects and collections: A cultural study. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

52.
Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn Meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37(1), 1-41.

53.
Perry, D. L. (1992). Designing exhibits that motivate. ASTC Newsletter, 20(1), 9-12.

54.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.

55.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 97-105.

56.
Piscitelli, B., & Weier, K. (2002). Learning with, through, and about art: The role of social interactions. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 121-151). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

57.
Piscitelli, B., Everett, M., & Weier, K. (2003). Enhancing young children's museum experiences: A manual for museum staff. QUT Museum Collaborative. Queensland: Australian Research Council.

58.
Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning science outside of school: Handbook of research on science education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

59.
Shuh, J. H. (2001). Teaching yourself to teach with objects. In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The educational role of the museum (pp. 80-91). New York: Routledge.

60.
Smilansky, S. (1990). Sociodramatic play: Its relevance to behavior and achievement in school. In E. Klugman & S. Smilansky (Eds.), Children's play and learning: Perspectives and policy. New York: Teachers College Press.

61.
Sund, R. B., & Trowbridge, L. W. (1973). Teaching science by inquiry in the secondary school (2nd ed.). Columbus: Charles E Merrill Publishing Company.

62.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

63.
Wertsch, J. (2002). Epistemological issues about objects. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning (pp. 113-120). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

64.
William, S. R., & Baxter, J. A. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse-oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 21-38. crossref(new window)

65.
Yang, J. (2006). Paradigm shift in museum objects and implications for object-based learning. Art Education Research Review, 20(2), 285-310.

66.
Zana, B. (2006). Seeing ourselves through their eyes: How do teachers regard science centers?. Proceedings of the European Network of Science centers and Museums Conference, Mechelen, Belgium.