JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Discussions About the Three Aspects of Scientific Literacy: Focus on Integrative Understanding, Settlement in Curriculum, and Civic Education
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Discussions About the Three Aspects of Scientific Literacy: Focus on Integrative Understanding, Settlement in Curriculum, and Civic Education
Park, Jongwon;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
There have been many discussions about scientific literacy (SL), which caused many science educators concern for many years. This paper focuses on three aspects about SL. First, there are various opinions, and components or types of SL. Second, it has been pointed out that the reconciliation between curriculum focusing on SL and curriculum focusing on scientific knowledge system is difficult. Third, the level of SL of citizens who learned science in schools is not so high. Related to these aspects, this paper suggests three recommendations. First, the paper suggests three dimensional model of SL and some examples of its application. Second, elementary and middle school focus on SL in their science curriculum and high school focuses on scientific knowledge system in the curriculum for preparing for future jobs. Third, we need to give efforts to lifelong science eduction for citizens` SL as well as school teachings for SL. In the conclusion section, it is described what aspects should be additionally considered for the discussions and recommendations about three aspects of SL.
 Keywords
scientific literacy;three dimensional model of scientific literacy;science curriculum;science knowledge system;lifelong education;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

2.
Atkin, J. M., & Helms, J. (1993). Getting serious about priorities in science education. Studies in Science Education, 21, 1-20. crossref(new window)

3.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why "What works" won't work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1-22. crossref(new window)

4.
Blades, D. (1997). Procedures of Power and Curriculum Change: Foucault and the Quest for Possibilities in Science Education. New York: Peter Lang.

5.
Branscomb, A. W. (1981). Knowing how to know. Science, Technology, & Human, Values, 6(36), 5-9.

6.
Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

7.
Chen, F., Shi, Y., & Xu, F. (2009). An analysis of the public scientific literacy study in China. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 607-616. crossref(new window)

8.
Choi, J., & Song, J. (1996). Students' preference for different contexts in learning science. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 341-352. crossref(new window)

9.
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. crossref(new window)

10.
Crowell, A., & Schunn, C. (2015, March 21). Unpacking the relationship between science education and applied scientific literacy. Research in Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11165-015-9462-1 crossref(new window)

11.
De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249-266. crossref(new window)

12.
DeBore, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. crossref(new window)

13.
Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 201-213.

14.
Dohm, A., & Schniper, L. (2007). Employment outlook: 2006-16: Occupational employment projections to 2016. Monthly Labor Review, 130(11), 86-125. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2007/11/art5full.pdf

15.
Driel,, J. H., & Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158. crossref(new window)

16.
Elliot, P. (2006). Reviewing newspaper articles as a technique for enhancing the scientific literacy of students-teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1245-1265. crossref(new window)

17.
Fensham, P. J. (1998). The politics of legitimating and marginalizing companion meanings: Three Australian case stories. In D. A. Roberts & L. Ostman (Eds.), Problems of Meaning in Science Curriculum (pp. 178-192). New York: Teachers College Press.

18.
Fensham, P. J. (2002). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(1), 9-24. crossref(new window)

19.
Fensham, P. J. (2008). Science Education Policy-making: Eleven Emerging Issues. Paris: UNESCO.

20.
Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98, 549-580. crossref(new window)

21.
Gabel, L. L. (1976). The development of a model to determine perceptions of scientific literacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

22.
Graber, W., Erdmann, T., & Schlieker, V. (2001). ParCIS: Partnership between Chemical Industry and Schools. Retrieved July, 10, 2015, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED466362.pdf

23.
Hoban, G.F. (2005). The missing links in teacher education design: Developing a multi-linked conceptual framework. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

24.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362. crossref(new window)

25.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.

26.
Jim, R. (2001). Identifying science understanding for unctional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-44. crossref(new window)

27.
Jong, E.D., Armitage, F., Brown, M., Butler, P., & Hayes, J. (1994). Physics Two. Melbourne: Heinemann.

28.
Klein, P. D. (2006). The challenge of scientific literacy: From the viewpoint of second-generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 143-178. crossref(new window)

29.
Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimensions of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. crossref(new window)

30.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2007). The Gap Between Research and Practice Revisited. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 303-310. crossref(new window)

31.
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94. crossref(new window)

32.
Law, N., Fensham, P. J., Li. S., & Bing, W. (2000). Public understanding of science as basic literacy. Melbourne Studies in Education, 41(2), 145-156. crossref(new window)

33.
Lee, M. (2014). Characteristics and trends in the classifications of scientific literacy definitions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 55-62. crossref(new window)

34.
Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: Science and the public. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 301-311.

35.
Lockard, C. B., & Wolf, M. (2012). Occupational employment projections to 2020. Monthly Labor Review, 135(1), 84-108.

36.
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing Science teachers' Pedagogical Content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense publishers.

37.
Millar, R. (1996). Toward a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77, 7-18.

38.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future: A report with ten recommendations. Retrieved from July, 10, 2015, from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Beyond%202000.pdf

39.
Miller, J. D. (1983). The American People and Science Policy. NY: Pergamon Press.

40.
Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 203-223. crossref(new window)

41.
Murcia, K. (2009). Re-thinking the development of scientific literacy through a rope metaphor. Research in Science Education, 39, 215-229. crossref(new window)

42.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240. crossref(new window)

43.
National Science Teachers Association [NSTA] (1982). Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s. Washington, DC: Author.

44.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literate: A framework for PISA 2006. Retrieved July, 10 2015, from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/assessing-scientific-reading-and-mathematical-literacy_9789264026407-en

45.
Park, C, -I., Park, J., & Jung, H. (1998). A study of high school students' interests and concerns in physics. Journal of Science Education: Chonnam National University, 22, 1-10.

46.
Park, J., Liu, C., Huang, C., Shen, M., & Shin, M. -K. (2016). Introducing modern science and high technology in schools. In H. -S. Lin, J. K. Gilbert, & C, -J., Lien (Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in East Asia: Trends and Perspectives (pp. 391-416). Taipei: Higher Education Publishing Co., Ltd.

47.
Ramirez, F. O., Luo, X., Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2006). Student achievement and national economic growth. American Journal of Education, 113, 1-29. crossref(new window)

48.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

49.
Roschelle, J., Bakia, M., Toyama, Y., & Patton, C. (2011). Eight issues for learning scientists about education and the economy. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 3-49. crossref(new window)

50.
Roth, W-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis, Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33-56. crossref(new window)

51.
Shamos, M. H. (1996). The myth of scientific literacy. Liberal Education, 82(3), 44-49.

52.
Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of Scientific Information (pp. 44-52). Basel: Karger.

53.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspective on evidence-based research in education: What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5-14.

54.
Turner, S. (2008). School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy? Public Understanding of Science, 17, 55-72. crossref(new window)

55.
Vick, M. (2006). "It's a Difficult Matter": Historical perspectives on the enduring problem of the practicum in teacher preparation, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 181-198. crossref(new window)

56.
Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H. -L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 559-589. crossref(new window)