JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Comparative Study on European Container Terminal Operation System
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Comparative Study on European Container Terminal Operation System
Han, Chul-Hwan; Kim, Yong-Wong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
As the competition in the liner shipping industry is becoming fiercer, the shipping company is trying to find the way to keep the best competitive position by reducing the cost level as low as possible and offering the best quality of service to their customer. In order to achieve this goal, the selection of port and terminal that have the best quality of service and cost effective structure is essential for the shipping line, where they can only have a chance to save the money. In this context, the paper compares three European container terminals in order to understand the factors that have to be considered in the decision making process for the selection of terminal. And its advantages and disadvantages of each type of container terminal operation system were analyzed from the liner shipping company`s point of view in terms of cost, time, flexibility, stability, hinterland connection, geographical position and terminal productivity. It is obvious that the cost factors are very important for liner shipping company to select their terminal. However, there might be even more important factors than the cost factors, such as quality of port and terminal service, mutual trust, and possibility of future development.
 Keywords
port competitiveness;conventional terminal;automated terminal;indented berth;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Baird, B., (1996), 'Containerization and the Decline of the Upstream Urban Port in Europe', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 145-156 crossref(new window)

2.
Fleming, D, Hayuth, Y., (1993), 'Spatial Characteristics of Transportation Hubs: centrality and intermediacy', Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 3-18 crossref(new window)

3.
Goss, R. O., (1990), 'Economic Policies and Seaports 4; strategies for port authority', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 273-287 crossref(new window)

4.
Haezendonck, E., Pison, G., Rousseeuw, P., Struyo, A., and Verbeke, A. (2000), 'The Competitive Advantage of Seaports'. International Journal of Maritime Economics, Vol. II, No.2, pp. 69-81 crossref(new window)

5.
Hayuth, Y., Flemming, D. (1994), 'Concepts of Strategic Commercial Location: the case of container ports'. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 187-193 crossref(new window)

6.
Heaver, T. D. (1995), 'The Implications of Increased Competition among Ports for Port Policy and Management', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.22, No. 2, pp.125-133 crossref(new window)

7.
Jung, S. H. (1999), Analysis of Private Container Terminal Operation. MSc Dissertation, Korea Maritime Univ., Pusan, South Korea

8.
McCalla, R. J. (1994), 'Canadian Container: how have they fared? How will they do?', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 207-217 crossref(new window)

9.
Miyajima, M., KWak, K. S., (1989), 'Economic Analysis of Interport Competition in Container Cargo: peripheral ports versus Tokyo bay ports', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 47-55 crossref(new window)

10.
Notteboom, T., (1997), 'Concentration and Loadcentre Development in the European Container Port System', Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 95-115 crossref(new window)

11.
Notteboom, T., Coeck, C., Verbeke, A., and Winkelmans, W. (1997), 'Containerization and the Corrpetitive Potential of Upstream Urban Ports in Europe', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 285-289 crossref(new window)

12.
Slack, B. (1985), 'Containerization, Inter-port competition, and Port Selection'. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 293-303 crossref(new window)

13.
Notteboom, T., Comotis, C. and Sletmo, G. (1996), 'Shipping Line as Agents of Change in the Port Industry', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 289-300 crossref(new window)

14.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (1992), Port Marketing and the Challenge of the Third Generation Port, UNCTAD.