JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Choice Factors of Transshipment Port in Northeast Asia
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Choice Factors of Transshipment Port in Northeast Asia
Park, Nam-Kyu; Lim, Chae-Kwan;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In order to attract more transshipment cargoes, Busan Port Authority (BPA) has, since 2003, adopted the volume incentive policy by which more than US$ 10 million annually have been paid back to shipping lines that were called at the port. However, having been a transshipment port for the Northeast region of China, the port of Busan has come under threat from bold Chinese port development projects, notably Shanghai, as northern Chinese regionnl ports place more emphasis on building facilities capable of handling growing trade volumes. Undoubtedly this would lead to a decline in transshipment container traffic moved via Busan. The purpose of this paper is to identify some core factors that have been affecting the increase of transshipment cargoes of Busan and further to recommend BPA an improved incentive scheme with which more T/S cargoes can be attracted into the port of Busan To clarity the reason why T/S cargoes have increased in the port of Busan, several steps are made as follows: The first step is to make a quantitative model for explaining the development of T/S cargoes during the last decade. The second step is to define the dependent and the independent variables for multiple regressions after testing variable significance. For this, data collection and the accuracy of validation have been done by the direct interview with the experienced staffs in shipping companies of both domestic and foreign country. After validating the model with collected data, the final step is to find variables which are explaining the model mostly. In conclusion, 2 variables were clearly identified as core factors that explain well the development of T/S cargoes in the port of Busan: `Mohring effect` and total cost. It is strongly recommended, by an empirical study, that an incentive scheme be changed to a way which more feeder vessels rather than mother vessels can reduce their direct costs to call in the port of Busan.
 Keywords
Northeast Asia;Transshipment Port;Choice of Transshipment Port;Incentive;Busan Port Authority;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Choice Factors of Transshipment Port in Northeast Asia, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 2009, 33, 7, 491  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Bae, B. T. (1999), "The Devices to Increase Transshipment Cargoes of the Port of Pusan," Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 15, pp. 179-208

2.
Containerisation International (2007), Year Book 2007

3.
Drewry (2005), Ship Operation Costs Annual Review and Forecast, June 2005

4.
Drewry(2006), Annual Container Market Review and Forecast 2006/2007

5.
Ohashia H, Kimb T. S., Oumn T. H., Yuc C. (2005), "Choice of air cargo transshipment airport: an application to air cargo traffic to/from Northeast Asia," Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 11 crossref(new window)

6.
Baek I. H., (2005), "Transshipment Port Selection ISM&AHP," The Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 54(June), pp. 43-64

7.
Jung, T. W., and Kwak K. S.(2002), "Strategies to Attract Transshipment Container Cargos from/to China by Korea Ports," Journal of Transportation Research Society of Korea, Vol. 20, No.2, pp. 7-16

8.
Lim, T. C., Thanopoulou H. A. and Beresford A. K. C. (2003), "Transshipment Port Selection and Decision-making Behavior: Analysing the Taiwanese Case," International Journal of Logistics: Research and Application, Vol. 6, No.4, pp. 229-244 crossref(new window)

9.
Lim, T. C., Thanopoulou H. A. and Beresford A. K. C. (2004), "An Application of AHP on Transshipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 6, No.1, 2004, pp. 70-91 crossref(new window)

10.
Mohring, H. (1972), "Optimization and Scale Economies in Urban Bus Transportation", American Economic Review, pp. 591-604

11.
Ng, K. Y. A. (2006), "Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transshipment Market: An Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 8, pp. 234-250 crossref(new window)

12.
Ocean Shipping Consultants (2007), Container Port Strategy, Emerging issues

13.
Ocean Shipping Consultants(2007), Marketing of Container Tenninals, 2004

14.
Park, B. I. and Sung S. K.(2008), "The Decision Criteria on the Transshipment Container Ports," Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 41-60

15.
Park, Y. T. and Kim Y. M.(2003), "A Study on the Strategies to attract Transshipment Container Cargoes in Korea," Journal of Logistics Association, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 95-121

16.
Peran V. R., (2008) "Subsidisation of Urban Public Transport and the Mohring Effect", Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 42, No.2

17.
Veldman, S. and Buckmann, E. (2003) "A Model on Container Port Competition, An application for the West European Container Hub-ports", Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 5, No.2, March

18.
Veldman, S., Buckmann, E., and Saitua, R. (2005) "River Depth and Container Port Market Shares: The Impact of Deepening the ScheIdt River on the West European Container Hub-Port. Market Shares", Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 7, No.4

19.
Veldman, S., and Vroomen, B., (2007) "A model of container port competition: an application for the transshipment market of the Mediterranean", IAME Conference Athens 2007